Dataset Information

Severe lymphoedema in gynaecological cancers: Impact of pneumatic compression on quality of life.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Good survival rates from gynaecological cancers focus our attention on the quality of survivorship. Lymphoedema is a common complication that affects many aspects of quality of life (QOL). We undertook a prospective audit of QOL of patients with higher grade lymphoedema using home compression pneumatic devices. The aim of this study was to assess QOL in a mixed gynaecological cancer cohort before and after at least eight weeks of home compression treatment.

Methods

Thirteen patients with the most severely disabling lower limb lymphoedema based on routinely collected QOL scores or a history of hospital admissions with related infection were invited to participate. QOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 Version 3.0 and a supplementary gynaecological cancer-specific lymphoedema questionnaire. Home compression therapy was introduced not sooner than 3 months after primary cancer treatment. All patients applied compression treatment for at least one hour per day. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were applied. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

All participants' functional and symptom scores improved with compression therapy with the exception of sexual function.

Conclusions

Self-management with pneumatic compression devices at home is a useful adjunct in the management of severe lymphoedema. Our preliminary experience showed a substantial improvement in most QOL parameters. We cannot say if domiciliary treatment with this compression device would have broader application or a role in primary or secondary prevention of lymphoedema if introduced at an earlier stage.

SUBMITTER: Freyne A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8683719 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLymphoedema is a chronic condition that causes swelling in the body tissues. Presently, there is no cure for lymphoedema; instead, current treatment is aimed at lifelong management to help control symptoms. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) therapy can be considered as an adjunct to standard lymphoedema care; however, research regarding the efficacy of this treatment modality is limited.MethodsTwenty participants were recruited from an outpatient lymphoedema clinic (South Wales, UK) to a feasibility randomised control trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of an IPC device (LymphAssist, Huntleigh Healthcare) in reducing lower limb volume. The primary objective was to assess feasibility in terms of (1) study feasibility, including recruitment, retention and assessment of outcome measures, and (2) intervention feasibility, including intervention fidelity and acceptability to participants. Participants were randomly assigned to a control group (n = 10) or intervention group (n = 10). The control group received their standard lymphoedema care only for a 6-month period, whereas the intervention group received their standard lymphoedema care plus an IPC device to use for 6 months. A bilateral lower limb assessment and quality of life survey were undertaken at baseline and 3- and 6-month time points.ResultsThe study recruited to target within the planned time frame with a retention rate of 80%. Issues relating to potential recruitment bias and study attrition were identified and possible solutions explored. In addition, supplementary primary outcome measures that are important to the study population were identified and will be incorporated into the design of future studies.ConclusionThis feasibility study identified that a larger randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of home use IPC devices is feasible with modifications to the study protocol.Trial registrationThis trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03825263).

Project description:IntroductionGynaecological cancers collectively account for almost 10% of cancer diagnoses made in Australian women. The extent of variation in gynaecological cancer survival rates and treatment outcomes across Australia is not well documented. The purpose of the clinical quality registry described in this paper is to systematically monitor and improve quality of care provided to these women, and facilitate clinical process improvements to ensure better patient outcomes and greater adherence to best practice care. The registry infrastructure has been developed in conjunction alongside the inaugural ovarian, tubal and peritoneal (OTP) module, allowing for concurrent piloting of the methodology and one module. Additional tumour modules will be developed in time to cover the other gynaecological tumour types.Method and analysisThe National Gynae-Oncology Registry (NGOR) aims to capture clinical data on all newly diagnosed cancers of the uterus, ovary, fallopian tubes, peritoneum, cervix, vulva and vagina in Australia with a view to using these data to support improved clinical care and increased adherence to 'best practice'. Data are sourced from existing clinical databases maintained by clinicians and/or hospital gynaecological cancer units. A pilot phase incorporating only OTP cancers has recently been conducted to assess the feasibility of the registry methodology and assess the support of a quality initiative of this nature among clinicians and other key stakeholders.Ethics and disseminationThe NGOR has received National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) ethics approval from Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), NMA HREC Reference Number: HREC/17/MonH/198. We also have approval from Mercy Health HREC and University of Tasmania HREC. Data will be routinely reported back to participating sites illustrating their performance against measures of agreed best practice. It is through this feedback system that the registry will support changes to quality of care and improved patient outcomes.

Project description:Aim and objectivesTo review the literature on Nordic women's lived experiences and quality of life (QoL) after gynaecological cancer treatment.BackgroundWhile incidence and survival are increasing in all groups of gynaecological cancers in the Nordic countries, inpatient hospitalisation has become shorter in relation to treatment. This has increased the need for follow-up and rehabilitation.DesignIntegrative literature review using the Equator PRISMA guidelines.MethodsThe review was selected, allowing inclusion of both experimental and nonexperimental research. The search included peer-reviewed articles published 1995-2017. To frame the search strategy, we applied the concept of rehabilitation, which holds a holistic perspective on health.ResultsFifty-five articles were included and were contextualised within three themes. Physical well-being in a changed body encompasses bodily changes comprising menopausal symptoms, a changed sexual life, complications in bowels, urinary tract, lymphoedema and pain, bodily-based preparedness and fear of recurrence. Mental well-being as a woman deals with questioned womanliness, the experience of revitalised values in life, and challenges of how to come to terms with oneself after cancer treatment. Psychosocial well-being and interaction deals with the importance of having a partner or close person in the process of coming to terms with oneself after cancer. Furthermore, the women needed conversations with health professionals around the process of coping with changes and late effects, including intimate and sensitive issues.ConclusionYears after gynaecological cancer, women have to deal with fundamental changes and challenges concerning their physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Future research should focus on how follow-up programmes can be organised to target the multidimensional aspects of women's QoL. Research collaboration across Nordic countries on rehabilitation needs and intervention is timely and welcomed.Relevance to clinical practiceTo ensure that all aspects of cancer rehabilitation are being addressed, we suggest that the individual woman is offered an active role in her follow-up.

Project description:BACKGROUND: The number of women surviving cancer who live with symptoms of bowel toxicity affecting their quality of life continues to rise. In this retrospective study, we sought to describe and analyse the presenting clinical features in our cohort, and evaluate possible predictors of severity and chronicity in women with radiation-induced bowel injury after treatment for cervical and endometrial cancers. METHODS: Review of records of 541 women treated within the North London Gynaecological Cancer Network between 2003 and 2010 with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for cervical and endometrial cancer identified 152 women who reported significant new bowel symptoms after pelvic radiation. RESULTS: Factor analysis showed that the 14 most common and important presenting symptoms could be 'clustered' into 3 groups with predictive significance for chronicity and severity of disease. Median follow-up for all patients was 60 months. Univariate analysis showed increasing age, smoking, extended field radiation, cervical cancer treatment and the need for surgical intervention to be significant predictors for severity of ongoing disease at last follow-up. On multivariate analysis, only age, cancer type (cervix) and symptom combinations/'cluster' of (bloating, flatulence, urgency, rectal bleeding and per-rectal mucus) were found to be significant predictors of disease severity. Fifteen (19%) women in the cervical cancer group had radiation-induced bowel injury requiring surgical intervention compared with five (6.7%) in the endometrial cancer group. CONCLUSION: Women with cervical cancer are younger and appear to suffer more severe symptoms of late bowel toxicity, whereas women treated for endometrial cancer suffer milder more chronic disease. The impact of radiation-induced bowel injury and the effect on cancer survivorship warrants further research into investigation of predictors of severe late toxicity. There is a need for prospective trials to aid early diagnosis, while identifying the underlying patho-physiological process of the bowel injury.