Dataset Information

Accuracy and Reliability of Single-Camera Measurements of Ankle Clonus and Quadriceps Hyperreflexia.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a simple, single-camera smartphone-based method, named the Reflex Tracker (RT) system, for measuring reflex threshold angles related to ankle clonus and quadriceps hyperreflexia.

Design

A prospective comparison study using a high-fidelity reference standard was constructed employing a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design, with factors of rater (tester) type (student and experienced physical therapist), joint (ankle and knee), and repetition (2 per condition).

Setting

This multicenter study was conducted at 4 outpatient rehabilitation clinics.

Participants

A convenience sample of 14 individuals with a neurologic condition presented with 20 lower limbs that exhibited ankle clonus and/or quadriceps hyperreflexia and were included in the study. Also participating in the study were 8 student and 8 experienced physical therapist raters (testers) (N=16).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main outcome measures

The plantar flexor reflex threshold angle (PFRTA) related to ankle clonus and the quadriceps reflex threshold angle (QRTA) related to quadriceps hyperreflexia were quantified.

Results

PFRTA and QRTA results were compared between the smartphone RT method and synchronous 3-dimensional inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor motion capture. Mean difference (bias) was minimal between RT and IMU measurements for PFRTA (bias≤0.2°) and QRTA (bias≤1.2°). Intrarater reliability for PFRTA ranged from 0.85-0.90 using RT and from 0.85-0.87 using IMU; QRTA ranged from 0.97-0.98 using RT and from 0.96-0.99 using IMU. Intersensor reliability for PFRTA and QRTA was 0.97 and 0.99, respectively. Minimum detectable change for PFRTA ranged from 7.1°- 8.7° and for QRTA ranged from 6.1°-8.3°.

Conclusions

RT performed comparable to IMU for accurate and reliable measurement of PFRTA and QRTA to quantify ankle clonus and quadriceps hyperreflexia in clinical settings.

SUBMITTER: Macon K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8683842 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Scientists are increasingly using volunteer efforts of citizen scientists to classify images captured by motion-activated trail cameras. The rising popularity of citizen science reflects its potential to engage the public in conservation science and accelerate processing of the large volume of images generated by trail cameras. While image classification accuracy by citizen scientists can vary across species, the influence of other factors on accuracy is poorly understood. Inaccuracy diminishes the value of citizen science derived data and prompts the need for specific best-practice protocols to decrease error. We compare the accuracy between three programs that use crowdsourced citizen scientists to process images online: Snapshot Serengeti, Wildwatch Kenya, and AmazonCam Tambopata. We hypothesized that habitat type and camera settings would influence accuracy. To evaluate these factors, each photograph was circulated to multiple volunteers. All volunteer classifications were aggregated to a single best answer for each photograph using a plurality algorithm. Subsequently, a subset of these images underwent expert review and were compared to the citizen scientist results. Classification errors were categorized by the nature of the error (e.g., false species or false empty), and reason for the false classification (e.g., misidentification). Our results show that Snapshot Serengeti had the highest accuracy (97.9%), followed by AmazonCam Tambopata (93.5%), then Wildwatch Kenya (83.4%). Error type was influenced by habitat, with false empty images more prevalent in open-grassy habitat (27%) compared to woodlands (10%). For medium to large animal surveys across all habitat types, our results suggest that to significantly improve accuracy in crowdsourced projects, researchers should use a trail camera set up protocol with a burst of three consecutive photographs, a short field of view, and determine camera sensitivity settings based on in situ testing. Accuracy level comparisons such as this study can improve reliability of future citizen science projects, and subsequently encourage the increased use of such data.