Dataset Information

Longitudinal changes of frailty in 8 years: comparisons between physical frailty and frailty index.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Few studies have made longitudinal comparisons between frailty phenotype (FP) and frailty index (FI) changes. We aimed to investigate frailty status changes defined by FP and FI concurrently, and to compare the associated factors and incident disability among different combination of FI and FP trajectory groups.

Methods

Data on respondents aged over 50 who completed the 1999, 2003 and 2007 Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA) surveys (n = 2807) were excerpted. Changes of FI, FP and major time-dependent variables were constructed by group-based trajectory modeling. Logistic regression was used to investigate the associated factors and relationships with incident disability among different frailty trajectories.

Results

We identified four FP trajectories - stably robust, worsened frailty, improved frailty, and stably frail and three FI trajectories - stable FI, moderate increase FI and rapid increase FI. Lower self-rated health, mobility impairment, and depressed mood were associated with unfavorable FP and FI changes (all p < 0.001). Regardless of FP trajectory groups, the moderate and rapid increase FI group had significantly more comorbidities than the stable FI group, and more visual, hearing, oral intake impairment, more difficulty in meeting living expenses, and poorer cognitive function in ≥65-year-olds (all p < 0.05). In addition, the worsened frailty, improved frailty, and stably frail groups had ORs for incident disability of 10.5, 3.0, and 13.4, respectively, compared with the stably robust group (all p < 0.01); the moderate and rapid increase FI groups had 8.4-fold and 77.5-fold higher risk than the stable FI group (both p < 0.001). When combining FI and FP trajectories, risk increased with FI trajectory steepness, independent of FP change (all p < 0.01 in rapid increase FI vs stable FI).

Conclusions

Four FP trajectories (stably robust, worsened frailty, improved frailty, and stably frail) and three FI trajectories (stable FI, moderate increase FI and rapid increase FI) were identified. Lower self-rated health, mobility impairment, and depressed mood were associated with both unfavorable FP and FI trajectories. Nevertheless, even for individuals in stably robust or improved frailty FP groups, moderate or rapid increase in FI, either due to comorbidities, sensory impairment, cognitive deficits, or financial challenges, may still increase the risk of incident disability.

SUBMITTER: Hwang AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8684153 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Using big data and the theory of cumulative deficits to develop the multimorbidity frailty index (mFI) has become a widely accepted approach in public health and health care services. However, constructing the mFI using the most critical determinants and stratifying different risk groups with dose-response relationships remain major challenges in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to develop the mFI by using machine learning methods that select variables based on the optimal fitness of the model. In addition, we aimed to further establish 4 entities of risk using a machine learning approach that would achieve the best distinction between groups and demonstrate the dose-response relationship. METHODS:In this study, we used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to develop a machine learning multimorbidity frailty index (ML-mFI) using the theory of cumulative diseases/deficits of an individual older person. Compared to the conventional mFI, in which the selection of diseases/deficits is based on expert opinion, we adopted the random forest method to select the most influential diseases/deficits that predict adverse outcomes for older people. To ensure that the survival curves showed a dose-response relationship with overlap during the follow-up, we developed the distance index and coverage index, which can be used at any time point to classify the ML-mFI of all subjects into the categories of fit, mild frailty, moderate frailty, and severe frailty. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate the ability of the ML-mFI to predict adverse outcomes, such as unplanned hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and mortality. RESULTS:The final ML-mFI model contained 38 diseases/deficits. Compared with conventional mFI, both indices had similar distribution patterns by age and sex; however, among people aged 65 to 69 years, the mean mFI and ML-mFI were 0.037 (SD 0.048) and 0.0070 (SD 0.0254), respectively. The difference may result from discrepancies in the diseases/deficits selected in the mFI and the ML-mFI. A total of 86,133 subjects aged 65 to 100 years were included in this study and were categorized into 4 groups according to the ML-mFI. Both the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox models showed that the ML-mFI significantly predicted all outcomes of interest, including all-cause mortality, unplanned hospitalizations, and all-cause ICU admissions at 1, 5, and 8 years of follow-up (P<.01). In particular, a dose-response relationship was revealed between the 4 ML-mFI groups and adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:The ML-mFI consists of 38 diseases/deficits that can successfully stratify risk groups associated with all-cause mortality, unplanned hospitalizations, and all-cause ICU admissions in older people, which indicates that precise, patient-centered medical care can be a reality in an aging society.

Project description:ObjectivesDescribe (1) time-segment specific changes in physical activity (PA) into adolescence, (2) differences in change in PA between specific time-segments (weekdays-weekends, in-school-out-of-school, out-of-school-weekends, lesson-time-lunch-time), and (3) associations of change in time-segment specific with overall PA.DesignLongitudinal observational study (4-year follow-up).MethodsChildren from the SPEEDY study (n=769, 42% boys) had PA measured by accelerometer for at least three days at ages 10.2±0.3, 11.2±0.3 and 14.3±0.3years. Changes in moderate-to-vigorous PA (?MVPA, minutes ?2000counts/minute [cpm]) and total PA (?TPA, average cpm) during weekdays, weekends, in-school, out-of-school, lesson-times and lunch-times, were tested using three level (age, individual, school) mixed-effects linear regression. Differences in ?MVPA/?TPA between time-segments were tested using time-segment×age interaction terms. Associations of four-year time-segment specific ?MVPA/?TPA with four-year overall ?MVPA/?TPA were tested using two level (time-segment specific ?MVPA/?TPA, school) mixed-effects linear regression.ResultsMVPA and TPA declined in all time-segments, except lesson-time MVPA. Annual ?MVPA and, for boys only, ?TPA was greater on weekends than weekdays (beta±SE for interaction term: boys, -3.53±0.83min, -29.64±7.64cpm; girls, -2.20±0.64min) and out-of-school (boys, -4.36±0.79min, -19.36±8.46cpm; girls, -2.44±0.63min). ?MVPA and ?TPA during lunch-time was greater than during lesson-time (boys, -0.96±0.20min, -36.43±6.55cpm; girls, -0.90±0.13min, -38.72±4.40cpm). ?TPA was greater out-of-school than in-school (boys, -19.89±6.71cpm; girls, -18.46±6.51cpm). For all time-segments, four-year ?MVPA/?TPA was positively associated with four-year overall ?MVPA/?TPA (all p<0.042), except for girl's in-school and lunch-time TPA.ConclusionsInterventions focused on PA maintenance could target all time-segments, but weekends and out-of-school may be particularly advantageous due to the relatively large declines observed.

Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate relationships between frailty and cognition longitudinally in adults 50 years and older with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy.DesignSecondary analysis of a prospective longitudinal observational study.SettingUniversity of Rochester NCI Community Oncology Research Program community oncology clinics.ParticipantsPatients with breast cancer age 50 and older receiving adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 376) and age-matched controls without cancer (n = 234).MeasurementsFrailty was assessed using a modified frailty score from self-reported assessments (weakness, exhaustion, physical activity, and gait speed). Cognition was assessed by patient report (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition [FACT-Cog]) and objective measures. Frailty and cognition were measured at three time points (prechemotherapy [A1], postchemotherapy [A2], and 6 months postchemotherapy [A3]; similar time interval for controls). Linear regression models evaluated associations between frailty and cognition adjusting for covariates.ResultsThe average age was 59 years (standard deviation = 6.4 y). At baseline, patients with cancer had a higher mean frailty score (1.21 vs .73; P < .001) and lower mean FACT-Cog score (158.4 vs 167.3; P < .001) compared with controls. Objective cognitive measures were not statistically different. Longitudinal decline in FACT-Cog between A1 and A2 (P < .05) and between A1 and A3 (P < .01) was associated with increased frailty score in patients compared with controls. Longitudinal worsening in Controlled Oral Word Association (P < .05) and Trail-Making Test (P < .01) were associated with an increase in frailty between A1 and A2 in patients compared with controls; longitudinal decline in the Delayed Match to Sample test was associated with an increase in frailty between A1 and A3 (P < .05) in patients compared with controls. This finding remained significant for a subset analysis of those aged 65 and older.ConclusionIn patients with breast cancer aged 50 and older, longitudinal decline in FACT-Cog and objective measures of attention and memory were associated with increased frailty during treatment and up to 6 months posttreatment. Overall, our study suggests cognition and frailty are both important factors to assess in breast cancer patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:928-936, 2019.