Dataset Information

Quantitative single-cell analysis of immunofluorescence protein multiplex images illustrates biomarker spatial heterogeneity within breast cancer subtypes.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The extent of cellular heterogeneity in breast cancer could have potential impact on diagnosis and long-term outcome. However, pathology evaluation is limited to biomarker immunohistochemical staining and morphology of the bulk cancer. Inter-cellular heterogeneity of biomarkers is not usually assessed. As an initial evaluation of the extent of breast cancer cellular heterogeneity, we conducted quantitative and spatial imaging of Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2), Ki67, TP53, CDKN1A (P21/WAF1), CDKN2A (P16INK4A), CD8 and CD20 of a tissue microarray (TMA) representing subtypes defined by St. Gallen surrogate classification.

Methods

Quantitative, single cell-based imaging was conducted using an Immunofluorescence protein multiplexing platform (MxIF) to study protein co-expression signatures and their spatial localization patterns. The range of MxIF intensity values of each protein marker was compared to the respective IHC score for the TMA core. Extent of heterogeneity in spatial neighborhoods was analyzed using co-occurrence matrix and Diversity Index measures.

Results

On the 101 cores from 59 cases studied, diverse expression levels and distributions were observed in MxIF measures of ER and PR among the hormonal receptor-positive tumor cores. As expected, Luminal A-like cancers exhibit higher proportions of cell groups that co-express ER and PR, while Luminal B-like (HER2-negative) cancers were composed of ER+, PR- groups. Proliferating cells defined by Ki67 positivity were mainly found in groups with PR-negative cells. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) exhibited the highest proliferative fraction and incidence of abnormal P53 and P16 expression. Among the tumors exhibiting P53 overexpression by immunohistochemistry, a group of TNBC was found with much higher MxIF-measured P53 signal intensity compared to HER2+, Luminal B-like and other TNBC cases. Densities of CD8 and CD20 cells were highest in HER2+ cancers. Spatial analysis demonstrated variability in heterogeneity in cellular neighborhoods in the cancer and the tumor microenvironment.

Conclusions

Protein marker multiplexing and quantitative image analysis demonstrated marked heterogeneity in protein co-expression signatures and cellular arrangement within each breast cancer subtype. These refined descriptors of biomarker expressions and spatial patterns could be valuable in the development of more informative tools to guide diagnosis and treatment.

SUBMITTER: Cheung AM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8684264 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Immunohistochemistry has long been held as the gold standard for understanding the expression patterns of therapeutically relevant proteins to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers. Patient selection for targeted therapy in oncology has successfully relied upon standard microscopy-based methodologies, such as single-marker brightfield chromogenic immunohistochemistry. As promising as these results are, the analysis of one protein, with few exceptions, no longer provides enough information to draw effective conclusions about the probability of treatment response. More multifaceted scientific queries have driven the development of high-throughput and high-order technologies to interrogate biomarker expression patterns and spatial interactions between cell phenotypes in the tumor microenvironment. Such multi-parameter data analysis has been historically reserved for technologies that lack the spatial context that is provided by immunohistochemistry. Over the past decade, technical developments in multiplex fluorescence immunohistochemistry and discoveries made with improving image data analysis platforms have highlighted the importance of spatial relationships between certain biomarkers in understanding a patient's likelihood to respond to, typically, immune checkpoint inhibitors. At the same time, personalized medicine has instigated changes in both clinical trial design and its conduct in a push to make drug development and cancer treatment more efficient, precise, and economical. Precision medicine in immuno-oncology is being steered by data-driven approaches to gain insight into the tumor and its dynamic interaction with the immune system. This is particularly necessary given the rapid growth in the number of trials involving more than one immune checkpoint drug, and/or using those in combination with conventional cancer treatments. As multiplex methods, like immunofluorescence, push the boundaries of immunohistochemistry, it becomes critical to understand the foundation of this technology and how it can be deployed for use as a regulated test to identify the prospect of response from mono- and combination therapies. To that end, this work will focus on: 1) the scientific, clinical, and economic requirements for developing clinical multiplex immunofluorescence assays; 2) the attributes of the Akoya Phenoptics workflow to support predictive tests, including design principles, verification, and validation needs; 3) regulatory, safety and quality considerations; 4) application of multiplex immunohistochemistry through lab-developed-tests and regulated in vitro diagnostic devices.

Project description:Circulating hybrid cells (CHCs) are a newly discovered, tumor-derived cell population identified in the peripheral blood of cancer patients and are thought to contribute to tumor metastasis. However, identifying CHCs by immunofluorescence (IF) imaging of patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is a time-consuming and subjective process that currently relies on manual annotation by laboratory technicians. Additionally, while IF is relatively easy to apply to tissue sections, its application on PBMC smears presents challenges due to the presence of biological and technical artifacts. To address these challenges, we present a robust image analysis pipeline to automate the detection and analyses of CHCs in IF images. The pipeline incorporates quality control to optimize specimen preparation protocols and remove unwanted artifacts, leverages a β-variational autoencoder (VAE) to learn meaningful latent representations of single-cell images and employs a support vector machine (SVM) classifier to achieve human-level CHC detection. We created a rigorously labeled IF CHC dataset including 9 patients and 2 disease sites with the assistance of 10 annotators to evaluate the pipeline. We examined annotator variation and bias in CHC detection and then provided guidelines to optimize the accuracy of CHC annotation. We found that all annotators agreed on CHC identification for only 65% of the cells in the dataset and had a tendency to underestimate CHC counts for regions of interest (ROI) containing relatively large amounts of cells (>50,000) when using conventional enumeration methods. On the other hand, our proposed approach is unbiased to ROI size. The SVM classifier trained on the β-VAE encodings achieved an F1 score of 0.80, matching the average performance of annotators. Our pipeline enables researchers to explore the role of CHCs in cancer progression and assess their potential as a clinical biomarker for metastasis. Further, we demonstrate that the pipeline can identify discrete cellular phenotypes among PBMCs, highlighting its utility beyond CHCs.