Dataset Information

National Rare Diseases Registry System (NRDRS): China's first nation-wide rare diseases demographic analyses.

ABSTRACT:

Background

China has made tremendous progresses in serving the needs of its people living with rare diseases in the past decade, especially over the last 5 years. The Chinese government's systematic approach included a series of coordinated initiatives, amongst these are: forming the Rare Disease Expert Committee (2016), funding the "Rare Diseases Cohort Study" (2016-2020), and publishing its first "Rare Disease Catalog" (2018). Herein, we present the National Rare Diseases Registry System (NRDRS)-China's first national rare diseases registry, and the analysis of cases registered in the first 5 years ending Dec 31, 2020.

Results

The total 62,590 cases covered 166 disease/disease types, forming 183 disease cohorts. The data from nearly 22% of them (13,947 cases) is also linked to valuable biological samples. The average age of definitive diagnosis was 30.88 years; 36.07% of cases were under 18 years of age. Regional distribution analysis showed 60% of cases were from the more developed, wealthier East and North China, suggesting the local availability of quality care and patients' financial status were key access factors. Finally, 82.04% of cases were registered from the five clinical departments: Neurology, Endocrine, Hematology, Cardiovascular, and Nephrology, suggesting that either these are most affected by rare diseases, or that there were disease non-specific ascertainment factors.

Conclusions

The preliminary analysis of the first 5-year's data provides unique and valuable insight on rare disease distribution in China, and higlights the directions for enhancing equity, scale and utility.

SUBMITTER: Guo J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8684272 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAccording to the International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC), a known rare disease (RD) should be diagnosable within a year. This study sought: firstly, to ascertain how long it takes to obtain the diagnosis of a RD in Spain, along with its associated time trend; and secondly, to identify and measure diagnostic delay (defined by the IRDiRC as any period exceeding a year) by reference to the characteristics of RDs and the persons affected by them.MethodsUsing data sourced from the Spanish Rare Diseases Patient Registry, we performed a descriptive analysis of the time elapsed between symptom onset and diagnosis of each RD, by sex, age and date of symptom onset, and type of RD. We analysed the time trend across the period 1960-2021 and possible change points, using a Joinpoint regression model and assuming a Poisson distribution. The multivariate analysis was completed with backward stepwise logistic regression.ResultsDetailed information was obtained on 3304 persons with RDs: 56.4% had experienced delay in diagnosis of their RDs, with the mean time taken being 6.18 years (median = 2; IQR 0.2-7.5). Both the percentage of patients with diagnostic delay and the average time to diagnosis underwent a significant reduction across the study period (p < 0.001). There was a higher percentage of diagnostic delays: in women (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07-1.45); in cases with symptom onset at age 30-44 years (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.19-1.84): and when analysed by type of RD, in mental and behavioural disorders (OR 4.21; 95% CI 2.26-7.85), followed by RDs of the nervous system (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.02-1.88).ConclusionsThis is the first study to quantify time to diagnosis of RDs in Spain, based on data from a national registry open to any RD. Since over half of all persons affected by RDs experience delay in diagnosis, new studies are needed to ascertain the factors associated with this delay and the implications this has on the lives of patients and their families.

Project description:BackgroundLate HIV diagnosis is detrimental both to the individual and to society. Strategies to improve early diagnosis of HIV must be a key health care priority. We examined whether nation-wide electronic registry data could be used to predict HIV status using machine learning algorithms.MethodsWe extracted individual level data from Danish registries and used algorithms to predict HIV status. We used various algorithms to train prediction models and validated these models. We calibrated the models to mimic different clinical scenarios and created confusion matrices based on the calibrated models.FindingsA total 4,384,178 individuals, including 4,350 with incident HIV, were included in the analyses. The full model that included all variables that included demographic variables and information on past medical history had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curves of 88·4% (95%CI: 87·5% - 89·4%) in the validation dataset. Performance measures did not differ substantially with regards to which machine learning algorithm was used. When we calibrated the models to a specificity of 99·9% (pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) scenario), we found a positive predictive value (PPV) of 8·3% in the full model. When we calibrated the models to a sensitivity of 90% (screening scenario), 384 individuals would have to be tested to find one undiagnosed person with HIV.InterpretationMachine learning algorithms can learn from electronic registry data and help to predict HIV status with a fairly high level of accuracy. Integration of prediction models into clinical software systems may complement existing strategies such as indicator condition-guided HIV testing and prove useful for identifying individuals suitable for PrEP.FundingThe study was supported by funds from the Preben and Anne Simonsens Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University, the Danish AIDS Foundation, the Augustinus Foundation and the Danish Health Foundation.