Dataset Information

Ex-Vivo Method to Quantifiably Evaluate the Staining Effectiveness of Anterior Lens Capsule Dyes.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

High frequency of cataracts and the requirements of new European Union regulations for medical devices require the availability of preclinical models to adequately evaluate anterior lens capsule dyes before their use in patients. Herein, we describe an ex vivo method to quantifiably evaluate the macroscopic and microscopic staining effectiveness of anterior lens capsule dyes using porcine eyes.

Methods

Commercially available trypan blue-based products or physiological saline solution (negative control) was injected into porcine eyes. Anterior pole and lens (after extraction) were macroscopically photographed, and the images were quantitatively analyzed. Lenses were histologically processed, and the staining intensity microscopically was semiquantified.

Results

Macroscopic evaluation of the anterior pole revealed bluish staining of the anterior capsule; however, this coloring cannot be macroscopically discerned after lens extraction. Quantitative image analyses showed significant (P < 0.01) staining of the lens capsule compared to the negative control, but not significant (P > 0.05) between the products tested. Quantitative analysis of dying on lens images could not be performed. Microscopic semiquantification of the capsule staining intensity allows us to appreciate differences between products.

Conclusions

The described method is a quick and useful tool for macroscopic evaluation by surgeons to choose an anterior capsule staining for use during everyday surgeries, and a more specific microscopic evaluation also allows us to determine the effectiveness and usefulness of these products.

Translational relevance

This method satisfies preclinical effectiveness evaluations required by European Union regulations and complements the safety and toxicity evaluations that new products must guarantee before they enter the market and are used in clinical practice.

SUBMITTER: Fernandez-Bueno I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8685404 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in tumor detection/diagnosis. The use of exogenous contrast agents (CAs) helps to improve the discrimination between lesion and neighbouring tissue, but most of the currently available CAs are non-specific. Assessing the performance of new, selective CAs requires exhaustive assays and large amounts of material. Accordingly, in a preliminary screening of new CAs, it is important to choose candidate compounds with good potential for in vivo efficiency. This screening method should reproduce as close as possible the in vivo environment. In this sense, a fast and reliable method to select the best candidate CAs for in vivo studies would minimize time and investment cost, and would benefit the development of better CAs. RESULTS: The post-mortem ex vivo relative contrast enhancement (RCE) was evaluated as a method to screen different types of CAs, including paramagnetic and superparamagnetic agents. In detail, sugar/gadolinium-loaded gold nanoparticles (Gd-GNPs) and iron nanoparticles (SPIONs) were tested. Our results indicate that the post-mortem ex vivo RCE of evaluated CAs, did not correlate well with their respective in vitro relaxivities. The results obtained with different Gd-GNPs suggest that the linker length of the sugar conjugate could modulate the interactions with cellular receptors and therefore the relaxivity value. A paramagnetic CA (GNP (E_2)), which performed best among a series of Gd-GNPs, was evaluated both ex vivo and in vivo. The ex vivo RCE was slightly worst than gadoterate meglumine (201.9?±?9.3% versus 237?±?14%, respectively), while the in vivo RCE, measured at the time-to-maximum enhancement for both compounds, pointed to GNP E_2 being a better CA in vivo than gadoterate meglumine. This is suggested to be related to the nanoparticule characteristics of the evaluated GNP. CONCLUSION: We have developed a simple, cost-effective relatively high-throughput method for selecting CAs for in vivo experiments. This method requires approximately 800 times less quantity of material than the amount used for in vivo administrations.