Dataset Information

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging After Severe COVID-19 Infection Demonstrates Regional Ischemia Rather Than Global Blood Flow Reduction.

ABSTRACT: Background: Acute myocardial damage is common in severe COVID-19. Post-mortem studies have implicated microvascular thrombosis, with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) demonstrating a high prevalence of myocardial infarction and myocarditis-like scar. The microcirculatory sequelae are incompletely characterized. Perfusion CMR can quantify the stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and identify its association with infarction and myocarditis. Objectives: To determine the impact of the severe hospitalized COVID-19 on global and regional myocardial perfusion in recovered patients. Methods: A case-control study of previously hospitalized, troponin-positive COVID-19 patients was undertaken. The results were compared with a propensity-matched, pre-COVID chest pain cohort (referred for clinical CMR; angiography subsequently demonstrating unobstructed coronary arteries) and 27 healthy volunteers (HV). The analysis used visual assessment for the regional perfusion defects and AI-based segmentation to derive the global and regional stress and rest MBF. Results: Ninety recovered post-COVID patients {median age 64 [interquartile range (IQR) 54-71] years, 83% male, 44% requiring the intensive care unit (ICU)} underwent adenosine-stress perfusion CMR at a median of 61 (IQR 29-146) days post-discharge. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 67 ± 10%; 10 (11%) with impaired LVEF. Fifty patients (56%) had late gadolinium enhancement (LGE); 15 (17%) had infarct-pattern, 31 (34%) had non-ischemic, and 4 (4.4%) had mixed pattern LGE. Thirty-two patients (36%) had adenosine-induced regional perfusion defects, 26 out of 32 with at least one segment without prior infarction. The global stress MBF in post-COVID patients was similar to the age-, sex- and co-morbidities of the matched controls (2.53 ± 0.77 vs. 2.52 ± 0.79 ml/g/min, p = 0.10), though lower than HV (3.00 ± 0.76 ml/g/min, p< 0.01). Conclusions: After severe hospitalized COVID-19 infection, patients who attended clinical ischemia testing had little evidence of significant microvascular disease at 2 months post-discharge. The high prevalence of regional inducible ischemia and/or infarction (nearly 40%) may suggest that occult coronary disease is an important putative mechanism for troponin elevation in this cohort. This should be considered hypothesis-generating for future studies which combine ischemia and anatomical assessment.

SUBMITTER: Thornton GD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8688537 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the diagnostic performance of CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for myocardial bridging-related ischemia using dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) as a reference standard.Materials and methodsDynamic CT-MPI and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) data obtained from 498 symptomatic patients were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-five patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 62.7 ± 13.2 years; 48 males) who showed myocardial bridging in the left anterior descending artery without concomitant obstructive stenosis on the imaging were included. The change in CT-FFR across myocardial bridging (ΔCT-FFR, defined as the difference in CT-FFR values between the proximal and distal ends of the myocardial bridging) in different cardiac phases, as well as other anatomical parameters, were measured to evaluate their performance for diagnosing myocardial bridging-related myocardial ischemia using dynamic CT-MPI as the reference standard (myocardial blood flow < 100 mL/100 mL/min or myocardial blood flow ratio ≤ 0.8).ResultsΔCT-FFRsystolic (ΔCT-FFR calculated in the best systolic phase) was higher in patients with vs. without myocardial bridging-related myocardial ischemia (median [interquartile range], 0.12 [0.08-0.17] vs. 0.04 [0.01-0.07], p < 0.001), while CT-FFRsystolic (CT-FFR distal to the myocardial bridging calculated in the best systolic phase) was lower (0.85 [0.81-0.89] vs. 0.91 [0.88-0.96], p = 0.043). In contrast, ΔCT-FFRdiastolic (ΔCT-FFR calculated in the best diastolic phase) and CT-FFRdiastolic (CT-FFR distal to the myocardial bridging calculated in the best diastolic phase) did not differ significantly. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that ΔCT-FFRsystolic had largest area under the curve (0.822; 95% confidence interval, 0.717-0.901) for identifying myocardial bridging-related ischemia. ΔCT-FFRsystolic had the highest sensitivity (91.7%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (97.8%). ΔCT-FFRdiastolic had the highest specificity (85.7%) for diagnosing myocardial bridging-related ischemia. The positive predictive values of all CT-related parameters were low.ConclusionΔCT-FFRsystolic reliably excluded myocardial bridging-related ischemia with high sensitivity and NPV. Myocardial bridging showing positive CT-FFR results requires further evaluation.

Project description:Purpose of reviewAccumulating evidence exists for the value of coronary physiology for clinical decision-making in ischemic heart disease (IHD). The most frequently used pressure-derived index to assess stenosis severity, the fractional flow reserve (FFR), has long been considered the gold standard for this purpose, despite the fact that the FFR assesses solely epicardial stenosis severity and aims to estimate coronary flow impairment in the coronary circulation. The coronary flow reserve (CFR) directly assesses coronary blood flow in the coronary circulation, including both the epicardial coronary artery and the coronary microvasculature, but is nowadays less established than FFR. It is now recognized that both tools may provide insight into the pathophysiological substrate of ischemic heart disease, and that particularly combined FFR and CFR measurements provide a comprehensive insight into the multilevel involvement of IHD. This review discusses the diagnostic and prognostic characteristics, as well as future implications of combined assessment of FFR and CFR pressure and flow measurements as parameters for inducible ischemia.Recent findingsFFR and CFR disagree in up to 40% of all cases, giving rise to fundamental questions regarding the role of FFR in contemporary ischemic heart disease management, and implying a renewed approach in clinical management of these patients using combined coronary pressure and flow measurement to allow appropriate identification of patients at risk for cardiovascular events. This review emphasizes the value of comprehensive coronary physiology measurements in assessing the pathophysiological substrate of IHD, and the importance of acknowledging the broad spectrum of epicardial and microcirculatory involvement in IHD. Increasing interest and large clinical trials are expected to further strengthen the potential of advanced coronary physiology in interventional cardiology, consequently inducing reconsideration of current clinical guidelines.

Project description:BackgroundDespite increasing emphasis on reducing radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), the use of radiation-sparing practices (RSP) at nuclear laboratories remains limited. Defining real-world impact of RSPs on effective radiation dose (E) can potentially further motivate their adoption.MethodsMPI studies performed between 1/2010 and 12/2016 within a single health system were included. Mean E was compared between sites with 'basic' RSP (defined as elimination of thallium-based protocols and use of stress-only (SO) imaging on conventional single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) cameras) and those with 'advanced' capabilities (sites that additionally used solid-state detector (SSD) SPECT cameras, advanced post-processing software (APPS) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging), after matching patients by age, gender, and weight. Contributions of individual RSP to E reduction were determined using multiple linear regression after adjusting for factors affecting tracer dose.ResultsAmong 55,930 MPI studies performed, the use of advanced RSP was associated with significantly lower mean E compared to basic RSP (7 ± 5.6 mSv and 16 ± 5.4 mSv, respectively; P < 0.001), with a greater likelihood of achieving E < 9 mSv (65.7% vs. 10.8%, respectively; OR 15.8 [95% CI 14 to 17.8]; P < 0.0001). Main driver of E reduction was SO-SSD SPECT (mean reduction = 11.5 mSv), followed by use of SO-SPECT + APPS (mean reduction = 10.1 mSv), ;ET (mean reduction = 9.7 mSv); and elimination of thallium protocols (mean reduction = 9.1 mSv); P < 0.0001 for all comparisons.ConclusionIn a natural experiment with implementation of radiation-saving practices at a large health system, stress-only protocols used in conjunction with modern SPECT technologies, the use of PET and elimination of thallium-based protocols were associated with greatest reductions in radiation dose. Availability of several approaches to dose reduction within a health system can facilitate achievement of targeted radiation benchmarks in a greater number of performed studies.

Project description:The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurement in patients referred for dynamic SPECT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging. SPECT data were acquired on a cadmium zinc telluride-based pinhole cardiac camera in list mode using a stress (251 ± 15 MBq)/rest (512 ± 26 MBq) 1-d 99mTc-tetrofosmin protocol. Kinetic analyses were done with software using a 1-tissue-compartment model and converted to MBF using a previously determined extraction fraction correction. MFR was analyzed and compared globally and regionally. Motion detection was applied, but not attenuation correction. Results: In total, 124 patients (64 male, 60 female) were included, and SPECT acquisitions were twice reconstructed by the same nuclear medicine board-certified physician for 50 patients and by 2 different physicians for 74. Both intra- and interobserver measurements of global MFR had no significant bias (-0.01 [P = 0.94] and 0.01 [P = 0.67], respectively). However, rest MBF and stress MBF were significantly different in global left ventricular evaluation (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively) and in the anterior territory (P < 0.0001) on interuser analysis. The average coefficient of variation was 15%-30% of the mean stress MBF if the analysis was performed by the same physician or 2 different physicians and was around 20% of the mean MFR independently of the processing physician. Using the MFR threshold of 2, we noticed good intrauser agreement, whereas it was moderate when the users were different (κ = 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56-0.94] vs. 0.56 [95% CI, 0.36-0.75], respectively). Conclusion: Repeated measurements of global MFR by the same physician or 2 different physicians were similar, with an average coefficient of variation of 20%. Better reproducibility was achieved for intrauser MBF evaluation. Automation of processing is needed to improve reproducibility.

Dataset Information

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging After Severe COVID-19 Infection Demonstrates Regional Ischemia Rather Than Global Blood Flow Reduction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets