Dataset Information

Medical cannabis for severe treatment resistant epilepsy in children: a case-series of 10 patients

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To report the findings of a case-series of 10 children suffering with intractable epilepsies in the UK to determine the feasibility for using whole-plant cannabis medicines to treat seizures in children.

Setting

This study was conducted retrospectively through collecting clinical data from caretakers and clinicians on study outcome variables. Participants were recruited through the MedCann Support and End our Pain charity groups which are patient representative groups that support children who are using medical cannabis to treat their epilepsies. Medicines were prescribed to patients by clinicians in both National Health Service and private medical practices. Follow-up calls were conducted throughout the period January 2021 to May 2021 to keep data recorded up to date.

Participants

Ten children, 18 years old or under, with intractable epilepsies were recruited from two charities. There were no limitations on diagnosis, sex or ethnic origin.

Interventions

Participants were treated with a range of whole-plant medical cannabis oils. Individual dosing regimens were determined by clinicians.

Primary outcome measure

The primary outcome measure was seizure frequency.

Results

Seizure frequency across all 10 participants reduced by 86% with no significant adverse events. Participants reduced use of antiepileptic drugs from an average of seven to one following treatment with medical cannabis. We also noted significant financial costs of £874 per month to obtain these medicines through private prescriptions.

Conclusions

This study establishes the feasibility of whole-plant medical cannabis as an effective and well-tolerated medicine for reducing seizure frequency in children suffering with intractable epilepsies. These findings justify the potential value of further research into the reported therapeutic benefit of whole-plant medicinal cannabis products.

SUBMITTER: Zafar R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8689159 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionCannabis use is known to be associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity. We describe three cases of cannabis-related malignant arrhythmias, who presented to the cardiac department at our institution within the last 2 years. All three patients were known to smoke cannabis on daily basis.Case summariesCase 1: A 30-year-old male, presented with recent onset of palpitations. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), and blood tests were all normal. During an inpatient exercise treadmill test (ETT) he developed polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), which converted spontaneously to supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in the recovery phase of the test. Subsequent risk stratification with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and coronary angiography showed no abnormalities and an electrophysiological study was negative for sustained VT, however, SVT was easily induced with rapid conversion to atrial fibrillation. The patient successfully stopped smoking all tobacco products including cannabis and was treated with beta-blockers, with no further episodes of arrhythmia. Case 2: A 30-year-old male presented to the Emergency Department with palpitations, chest pain, and dizziness that improved during exertion. His initial ECG demonstrated complete atrioventricular block (AVB). Subsequent traces showed Mobitz Type I and second-degree AVB, which converted to atrial flutter after exertion. Routine blood tests, TTE, and an ETT were all normal and he was discharged home with no conduction abnormalities. Case 3: A 24-year-old male presented with two episodes of syncope. Baseline examination was normal, with an ECG showing a low atrial rhythm. Interrogation of his implantable loop recorder showed episodes of early morning bradycardia episodes with no associated symptoms.DiscussionCannabis-related arrhythmia can be multiform regarding their presentation. Therefore, ambiguous combinations of arrhythmia should raise suspicion of underlying cannabis abuse, where clinically appropriate. Although causality with regards to cannabis use cannot be proven definitively in these cases, the temporal relationship between drug use and the onset of symptoms suggests a strong association.

Project description:BackgroundCannabis is legal for recreational and medical use in Canada. Our aim was to explore family experiences using medical cannabis for children with severe conditions in the context of legalization.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews between April and July 2019. Participants were parents of children attending BC Children's Hospital oncology or palliative care clinics, recruited through posters, emails or referral. Participants were included if they spoke English and their child used any type of cannabis for medical purposes. Interviews included open-ended questions about the child's cannabis use. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and thematic analysis was performed using qualitative description.ResultsTen interviews were completed with 9 mothers and 1 mother-father pair. The age range of the children was 22 months to 16 years. The primary reasons for cannabis use were epilepsy (6 children) or chemotherapy management (4 children). Five major themes were identified. 1) Child and family context, and cannabis as a last resort: children were seen as severely ill; parents sought cannabis out of desperation and responsibility to their child. 2) Varied information sources informed decision-making: parents lacked resources from health care providers and sought support from social media, industry and other families. 3) Cannabis as an ambiguous medicine: cannabis was viewed as both a serious drug that doctors should prescribe and as a natural alternative health product, safe to pursue alone. 4) Perceived effects: parents perceived medical benefits with few concerns about adverse effects. 5) Legal and financial challenges: parents were willing to obtain cannabis despite high costs and uncertain legality.InterpretationParents of children with severe conditions pursued medical cannabis despite obstacles and needed unbiased information to access alone. Scientific investigation is needed to develop pediatric medical guidelines to inform decisions.

Project description:This meta-analysis paper describes the analysis of observational clinical studies on the treatment of refractory epilepsy with cannabidiol (CBD)-based products. Beyond attempting to establish the safety and efficacy of such products, we also investigated if there is enough evidence to assume any difference in efficacy between CBD-rich extracts compared to purified CBD products. The systematic search took place in February/2017 and updated in December/2017 using the keywords "epilepsy" or "Dravet" or "Lennox-Gastaut" or "CDKL5" combined with "Cannabis," "cannabinoid," "cannabidiol," or "CBD" resulting in 199 papers. The qualitative assessment resulted in 11 valid references, with an average impact factor of 8.1 (ranging from 1.4 to 47.8). The categorical data of a total of 670 patients were analyzed by Fischer test. The average daily dose ranged between 1 and 50 mg/kg, with treatment length from 3 to 12 months (mean 6.2 months). Two thirds of patients reported improvement in the frequency of seizures (399/622, 64%). There were more reports of improvement from patients treated with CBD-rich extracts (318/447, 71%) than patients treated with purified CBD (81/175, 46%), [corrected] with statistical significance (p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, when the standard clinical threshold of a "50% reduction or more in the frequency of seizures" was applied, only 39% of the individuals were considered "responders," and there was no difference (p = 0.52) [corrected] between treatments with CBD-rich extracts (122/330, 37%) [corrected] and purified CBD (94/223, 42%). Patients treated with CBD-rich extracts reported lower average dose (6.0 mg/kg/day) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] than those using purified CBD (25.3 mg/kg/day). [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] The reports of mild (158/216 76% vs. 148/447, 33% p < 0.001) and severe (41/155, 26% vs. 23/328, 7% p < 0.0001) [corrected] adverse effects were more frequent in products containing purified CBD than in CBD-rich extracts. CBD-rich extracts seem to present a better therapeutic profile than purified CBD, at least in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy. The roots of this difference is likely due to synergistic effects of CBD with other phytocompounds (aka Entourage effect), but this remains to be confirmed in controlled clinical studies.