Dataset Information

1266. Melatonin for Renal Protection of Patients Treated with Polymyxin B: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

ABSTRACT: Abstract

Background

Polymyxins are one of the last resort treatments for carbapenem resistant gram-negative infections. Nephrotoxicity is its main adverse effect and has been related to oxidative stress mechanisms. Melatonin was associated to reduction in polymyxins nephrotoxicity in animal studies. Our objective is to evaluate the effect of melatonin on renal protection of patients receiving polymyxin B.

Methods

We did a single center, double blind, randomized clinical trial (NCT03725267) of melatonin 30mg versus placebo for patients treated with polymyxin B from October 2018 to April 2021, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Patients ≥18 years old, receiving polymyxin B for ≤48 hours, who accepted informed consent terms were included and excluded if intensive care unit (ICU) admission at enrollment, estimated glomerular rate estimated glomerular rate < 10ml/min, dialysis or previous melatonin use. Treatment with melatonin or placebo was randomized in blocks of 4 and maintained until the end of polymyxin B treatment of for a maximum of 14 days. Our main outcome was any level of nephrotoxicity by RIFLE score. Secondary outcomes were renal failure and need for dialysis. We estimated a sample size of 100 patients, however the study had to be stopped earlier due to recruitment restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results

Eighty-eight patients were randomized, 44 received melatonin and 44 received identical placebo pills. Patients had a mean age of 63.6±17.3 years, 60.2% were male, and had a median Charlson index of 5 (3-8.3). Most infections (79.5%) were microbiologically confirmed, having 68.6% Klebsiella sp isolated. Urinary tract accounted for47.7% of infection sites. Median time of polymyxin B therapy was 9.1±6.6 days. Combination therapy was prescribed for 89.8% of patients and 38.6% received at least another nephrotoxic drug. All variables were equally distributed among groups. Nephrotoxicity rates occurred in 23 of 44 (52.3%) in both groups, P=0.99. Patients who developed renal failure were 8(18.2%) vs 9(20.5%) and dialysis occurred in 4(9.1%) vs 5 (11.4%) of melatonin and placebo groups respectively.

Conclusion

Melatonin did not show a clinically significant renal protective effect in patients treated with polymyxin B.

Disclosures

Maria Helena Rigatto, MD, PhD, CNPq (Grant/Research Support) Diego Rodrigues Falci, MD, MSc, PhD, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker’s Bureau)GSK (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member)MSD (Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Speaker’s Bureau)United Medical (Speaker’s Bureau, Other Financial or Material Support) Alexandre Zavascki, MD, PhD, Pfizer (Grant/Research Support)

SUBMITTER: Rigatto M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8689713 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Delirium is highly problematic in palliative care (PC). Preliminary data indicate a potential role for melatonin to prevent delirium, but no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are reported in PC. METHODS:Patients aged ?18?years, with advanced cancer, admitted to an inpatient Palliative Care Unit (PCU), having a Palliative Performance Scale rating???30%, and for whom consent was obtained, were included in the study. Patients with delirium on admission were excluded. The main study objectives were to assess the feasibility issues of conducting a double-blind RCT of exogenous melatonin to prevent delirium in PC: recruitment, retention, procedural acceptability, appropriateness of outcome measures, and preliminary efficacy and safety data. Study participants were randomized in a double-blind, parallel designed study to receive daily melatonin 3?mg or placebo orally at 21:00 over 28?days or less if incident delirium, death, discharge or withdrawal occurred earlier. Delirium was diagnosed using the Confusion Assessment Method. Efficacy endpoints in the melatonin and placebo groups were compared using time-to-event analysis: days from study entry to onset of incident delirium. RESULTS:Over 16?months, 60/616 (9.7%; 95% CI: 7.5-12.4%) screened subjects were enrolled. The respective melatonin (n =?30) vs placebo (n =?30) outcomes were: incident delirium in 11/30 (36.7%; 95%CI: 19.9-56.1%) vs 10/30 (33%; 95% CI: 17.3-52.8%); early discharge (6 vs 5); withdrawal (6 vs 3); death (0 vs 1); and 7 (23%) vs 11 (37%) reached the 28-day end point. The 25th percentile time-to-event were 9 and 18?days (log rank, ?2 =?0.62, p =?0.43) in melatonin and placebo groups, respectively. No serious trial medication-related adverse effects occurred and the core study procedures were acceptable. Compared to those who remained delirium-free during their study participation, those who developed delirium (n =?21) had poorer functional (p =?0.036) and cognitive performance (p =?0.013), and in particular, poorer attentional capacity (p =?0.003) at study entry. CONCLUSIONS:A larger double-blind RCT is feasible, but both subject accrual and withdrawal rates signal a need for multisite collaboration. The apparent trend for shorter time to incident delirium in the melatonin group bodes for careful monitoring in a larger trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Registered on July 21st 2014 with ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02200172 .

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the dose of triptorelin that is sufficient to maintain complete ovarian suppression in female patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who require cyclophosphamide therapy, to determine the length of time needed to achieve ovarian suppression after initiation of triptorelin treatment, and to investigate the safety of triptorelin.MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study, female patients ages <21 years were randomized 4:1 to receive triptorelin (n = 25) or placebo (n = 6). The starting doses of triptorelin were 25, 50, 75, and 100 μg/kg, and the dose was escalated until complete ovarian suppression was maintained. The primary outcome was the weight-adjusted dose of triptorelin that provided complete ovarian suppression in at least 90% of the patients, as determined by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist stimulation testing. The secondary outcome was the period of time required to achieve ovarian suppression, as measured by unstimulated follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone levels after the initiation of triptorelin treatment.ResultsTreatment with triptorelin at a weight-adjusted dose of 120 μg/kg body weight provided sustained complete ovarian suppression in 90% of the patients. After administration of the initial dose of triptorelin, 22 days were required to achieve complete ovarian suppression. The rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) per 100 patient-months of followup were not higher in the triptorelin group compared with the placebo group (for AEs, 189 versus 362; for SAEs, 2.1 versus 8.5).ConclusionHigh doses of triptorelin are needed to achieve and maintain complete ovarian suppression, but such doses appear to be well tolerated in adolescent female patients with childhood-onset SLE. Our data suggest that a lag time of 22 days after initiation of triptorelin treatment is required before cyclophosphamide therapy is started or continued.