Dataset Information

Chest wall resection and reconstruction for primary and metastatic sarcomas: an 11-year retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Chest wall sarcomas are rare, aggressive malignancies, the management of which mainly revolves around surgery. Radical tumour excision with free margins represents the optimal treatment for loco-regional clinically resectable disease. The objective of this study was to review our 11-year experience with chest wall resection for primary and metastatic sarcomas, focusing on surgical techniques and strategies for reconstruction.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of a comprehensive database of patients who underwent chest wall resection for primary or secondary sarcoma at our Institute from January 2009 to December 2019.

Results

Out of 26 patients, 21 (81%) suffered from primary chest wall sarcoma, while 5 (19%) had recurring disease. The median number of resected ribs was 3. Sternal resection was performed in 6 cases (23%). Prosthetic thoracic reconstruction was deemed necessary in 24 cases (92%). Tumour recurrence was observed in 15 patients (58%). The median overall survival was 73.6 months. Primary and secondary tumours showed comparable survival (P = 0.49). At univariate analysis, disease recurrence and infiltrated margins on pathological specimens were associated with poorer survival (P = 0.014 and 0.022, respectively). In patients with primary sarcoma, the median progression-free survival was 13.3 months. Associated visceral resections were significantly associated to postoperative complications (P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Chest wall resection followed by prosthetic reconstruction is feasible in carefully selected patients and should be performed by experienced surgeons with the aim of achieving free resection margins, resulting in improved long-term outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Prisciandaro E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8691541 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Chest wall tumors are a relatively uncommon disease in clinical practice. Most of the published studies about chest wall tumors are usually single-center retrospective studies, involving few patients. Therefore, evidences regarding clinical conclusions about chest wall tumors are lacking, and some controversial issues have still to be agreed upon. In January 2019, 73 experts in thoracic surgery, plastic surgery, science, and engineering jointly released the Chinese Expert Consensus on Chest Wall Tumor Resection and Chest Wall Reconstruction (2018 edition). After that, numerous experts put forward new perspectives on some academic issues in this version of the consensus, pointing out the necessity to further discuss the points of contention. Thus, we conducted a survey through the administration of a questionnaire among 85 experts in the world. Consensus has been reached on some major points as follows. (I) Wide excision should be performed for desmoid tumor (DT) of chest wall. After excluding the distant metastasis by multi-disciplinary team, solitary sternal plasmacytoma can be treated with extensive resection and adjuvant radiotherapy. (II) Wide excision with above 2 cm margin distance should be attempted to obtain R0 resection margin for chest wall tumor unless the tumor involves vital organs or structures, including the great vessels, heart, trachea, joints, and spine. (III) For patients with chest wall tumors undergoing unplanned excision (UE) for the first time, it is necessary to carry out wide excision as soon as possible within 1-3 months following the previous surgery. (IV) Current Tumor Node Metastasis staging criteria (American Joint Committee on Cancer) of bone tumor and soft tissue sarcoma are not suitable for chest wall sarcomas. (V) It is necessary to use rigid implants for chest wall reconstruction once the maximum diameter of the chest wall defect exceeds 5 cm in adults and adolescents. (VI) For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) invading the chest wall, wide excision with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy are recommended for patients with stage T3-4N0-1M0. As clear guidelines are lacking, these consensus statements on controversial issues on chest wall tumors and resection could possibly serve as further guidance in clinical practice during the upcoming years.

Project description:Chest wall tumor resection can result in a large defect that can pose a challenge in reconstruction in restoring chest wall contour, maintaining respiratory mechanics, and improving cosmesis. Titanium plates were first introduced for treating a traumatic flail chest, which yielded promising results in restoring chest wall stability. Subsequently, the applications of titanium plates in chest wall reconstruction surgery were demonstrated in case reports and series. Our center has adopted this technique for a decade, and patients are actively followed up after operation. Here, we retrospectively analyze our 10-year experience of using titanium plates and other reconstruction approaches for chest wall reconstruction, in terms of clinical outcomes, complications, and reasons for reoperation to determine long-term safety and efficacy. Thirty-eight patients who underwent chest wall resection and reconstruction surgery were identified. Of these, 11 had titanium plate insertion, 11 had patch repair or flap reconstruction, and the remaining 16 had primary closure of defects. Chest wall reconstruction using titanium plate(s) and patch repair (with or without flap reconstruction) was associated with larger chest wall defects and more sternal resections than primary closure. Subgroup analysis also showed that reconstruction by the titanium plate technique was associated with larger chest wall defects than patch repair or flap reconstruction [286.80 cm2 vs. 140.91 cm2 (p = 0.083)]. There was no 30-day hospital mortality. Post-operative arrhythmia was more commonly seen following chest wall reconstruction compared with primary closure (p = 0.041). Furthermore, more wound infections were detected following the use of titanium plate reconstruction compared with the patch repair (with or without flap reconstruction) approach (p = 0.027). In conclusion, the titanium plate system is a safe, effective, and robust approach for chest wall reconstruction surgery, especially in tackling larger defect sizes.