Dataset Information

Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics.

ABSTRACT: Actigraphic measurements are an important part of research in different disciplines, yet the procedure of determining activity values is unexpectedly not standardized in the literature. Although the measured raw acceleration signal can be diversely processed, and then the activity values can be calculated by different activity calculation methods, the documentations of them are generally incomplete or vary by manufacturer. These numerous activity metrics may require different types of preprocessing of the acceleration signal. For example, digital filtering of the acceleration signals can have various parameters; moreover, both the filter and the activity metrics can also be applied per axis or on the magnitudes of the acceleration vector. Level crossing-based activity metrics also depend on threshold level values, yet the determination of their exact values is unclear as well. Due to the serious inconsistency of determining activity values, we created a detailed and comprehensive comparison of the different available activity calculation procedures because, up to the present, it was lacking in the literature. We assessed the different methods by analysing the triaxial acceleration signals measured during a 10-day movement of 42 subjects. We calculated 148 different activity signals for each subject's movement using the combinations of various types of preprocessing and 7 different activity metrics applied on both axial and magnitude data. We determined the strength of the linear relationship between the metrics by correlation analysis, while we also examined the effects of the preprocessing steps. Moreover, we established that the standard deviation of the data series can be used as an appropriate, adaptive and generalized threshold level for the level intersection-based metrics. On the basis of these results, our work also serves as a general guide on how to proceed if one wants to determine activity from the raw acceleration data. All of the analysed raw acceleration signals are also publicly available.

SUBMITTER: Maczak B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8691611 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:In this work, we aim to investigate whether information based metrics of neural activity are a useful tool for the quantification of consciousness before and shortly after birth. Neural activity is measured using fetal magnetoencephalography (fMEG) in human fetuses and neonates. Based on recent theories on consciousness, information-based metrics are established to measure brain complexity and to assess different levels of consciousness. Different metrics (measures of entropy, compressibility and fractality) are, thus, explored in a reference population and their usability is evaluated. For comparative analysis, two fMEG channels were selected: one where brain activity was previously detected and one at least 15 cm away, that represented a control channel. The usability of each metric was evaluated and results from the brain and control channel were compared. Concerning the ease of use with fMEG data, Lempel-Ziv-Complexity (LZC) was evaluated as best, as it is unequivocal and needs low computational effort. The fractality measures have a high number of parameters that need to be adjusted prior to analysis and therefore forfeit comparability, while entropy measures require a higher computational effort and more parameters to adjust compared to LZC. Comparison of a channel with brain activity and a control channel in neonatal recordings showed significant differences in most complexity metrics. This clear difference can be seen as proof of concept for the usability of complexity metrics in fMEG. For fetal data, this comparison produced less clear results which can be related to leftover maternal signals included in the control channel. Further work is necessary to conclusively interpret results from the analysis of fetal recordings. Yet this study shows that complexity metrics can be used for fMEG data on early consciousness and the evaluation gives a guidance for future work. The inconsistency of results from different metrics highlights the challenges of working with complexity metrics as neural correlates of consciousness, as well as the caution one should apply to interpret them.

Project description:Neural tissue is a hierarchical multiscale system with intracellular and extracellular diffusion compartments at different length scales. The normal diffusion of bulk water in tissues is not able to detect the specific features of a complex system, providing nonlocal, diffusion measurement averaged on a 10-20 μm length scale. Being able to probe tissues with sub-micrometric diffusion length and quantify new local parameters, transient anomalous diffusion (tAD) would dramatically increase the diagnostic potential of diffusion MRI (DMRI) in detecting collective and sub-micro architectural changes of human tissues due to pathological damage. In DMRI, the use of tAD parameters quantified using specific DMRI acquisition protocols and their interpretation has often aroused skepticism. Although the derived formulas may accurately fit experimental diffusion-weighted data, the relationships between the postulated dynamical feature and the underlying geometrical structure remains elusive, or at most only suggestive. This work aimed to elucidate and validate the image contrast and information that can be obtained using the tAD model in white matter (WM) through a direct comparison between different diffusion metrics and histology. Towards this goal, we compared tAD metrics extracted from pure subdiffusion (α-imaging) and super-pseudodiffusion (γ-imaging) in excised mouse spinal cord WM, together with T2 and T2* relaxometry, conventional (normal diffusion-based) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and q-space imaging (QSI), with morphologic measures obtained by optical microscopy, to determine which structural and topological characteristics of myelinated axons influenced tAD contrast. Axon diameter (AxDiam), the standard deviation of diameters (SD ax.diam ), axonal density (AxDens) and effective local density (ELD) were extracted from optical images in several WM tracts. Among all the diffusion parameters obtained at 9.4 T, γ-metrics confirmed a strong dependence on magnetic in-homogeneities quantified by R2* = 1/T2* and showed the strongest associations with AxDiam and ELD. On the other hand, α-metrics showed strong associations with SD ax.diam and was significantly related to AxDens, suggesting its ability to quantify local heterogeneity degree in neural tissue. These results elucidate the biophysical mechanism underpinning tAD parameters and show the clinical potential of tAD-imaging, considering that both physiologic and pathologic neurodegeneration translate into alterations of WM morphometry and topology.

Dataset Information

Detailed analysis and comparison of different activity metrics.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets