Dataset Information

Lobectomy Versus Sublobectomy in Stage IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The role lobectomy plays in stage IIIA/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial for a long time. What's more, no previous study concentrates on whether sublobectomy can improve survival outcome for these patients, so we performed this population-based study to investigate whether stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC can benefit from these two surgery types and compare survival outcomes after lobectomy and sublobectomy.

Methods

A total of 21,638 patients diagnosed with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database matched our selection criteria. The study cohort included patients who received no surgery (n = 15,951), sublobectomy (n = 628) and lobectomy (n = 5,059). Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression analyses, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression were used to illustrate the influence of sublobectomy and lobectomy on overall survival (OS) rates in the study cohort and compare these two surgery types.

Results

Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed sublobectomy [HR: 0.584 (95%CI: 0.531-0.644), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.619 (95%CI: 0.605-0.633), P-value <0.001] and lobectomy [HR: 0.439 (95%CI: 0.420-0.459), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.441 (95%CI: 0.431-0.451), P-value <0.001] were both related to better OS rates compared with no surgery, and lobectomy exhibited better survival than sublobectomy [HR: 0.751 (95%CI: 0.680-0.830), P-value <0.001; IPTW-adjusted HR: 0.713 (95%CI: 0.696-0.731), P-value <0.001]. Moreover, the results in subgroup analyses based on age, tumor size and radiotherapy and chemotherapy strategy in all study cohort were consistent.

Conclusion

Stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients could benefit from sublobectomy or lobectomy, and lobectomy provided better OS rates than sublobectomy.

SUBMITTER: Wang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8696201 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCompletely resected stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises a heterogeneous population according to discrepancies in survival prognosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are clinically significant, despite a lack of consensus regarding the immunoscore (IS) in NSCLC. Here, we determined the prognostic value of the immune microenvironment as an IS in a uniform cohort of patients with completely resected stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC.MethodsConsecutive patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC and who underwent complete resection (2005-2012) were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from surgical paraffin-embedded primary lung tumor specimen. For each case, two representative regions from the tumor center (CT) and two from the invasive margin (IM) containing the highest density of lymphocytes were selected. Densities of CD3+, CD45RO+, and CD8+ lymphocytes were assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) by specialized pathologists according to predefined scoring scales. Patients were classified according to IS definition based on TIL type, density, and distribution, and relationships between IS and prognosis were evaluated.ResultsPatients (N = 288) with complete IHC-based TMA spots were included. Univariate analyses showed that CD3+ T cell density was associated with neither overall survival (OS) nor distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), whereas CD45RO+ T cell density in the IM was a significant prognostic factor for DMFS (p = 0.02) and was predictive of OS (p = 0.05). Combined CD45RO+ and CD8+ cell infiltration in tumor regions (CT and IM) significantly improved IS prognostic impact. Multivariate analyses revealed IS as an independent prognostic predictor for both DMFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.002).ConclusionThe proposed IS might provide valuable prognostic information, including prediction of DMFS and OS in stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC patients. Larger patient cohorts are needed to validate this IS classification, which might assist with accurate risk stratification and treatment decisions.