Dataset Information

Association of Endotracheal Aspirate Culture Variability and Antibiotic Use in Mechanically Ventilated Pediatric Patients.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Endotracheal aspirate cultures are commonly collected from patients with mechanical ventilation to evaluate for ventilator-associated pneumonia or tracheitis. However, the respiratory tract is not sterile, making differentiating between colonization from bacterial infection challenging, and results may be unreliable owing to variable specimen quality and sample processing across laboratories. Despite these limitations, clinicians routinely interpret bacterial growth in endotracheal aspirate cultures as evidence of infection, sometimes regardless of organism significance, prompting antibiotic treatment.

Objective

To assess the variability in endotracheal aspirate culture rates and the association between culture rates and antibiotic prescribing among patients with mechanical ventilation across children's hospitals in the US.

Design, setting, and participants

Cross-sectional retrospective analysis of data obtained from the Children's Hospital Association Pediatric Health Information System database between January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2019. Participants were all patients hospitalized with mechanical ventilation aged less than 18 years.

Exposures

A charge for an endotracheal aspirate culture on a ventilated day.

Main outcomes and measures

Endotracheal aspirate culture rate and antibiotic days of therapy per ventilated days. For mechanical ventilation, clinical transaction classification codes for mechanical ventilation other unspecified ventilator assistance were used. To identify respiratory cultures, the laboratory test code for aerobic culture was used and relevant keywords (ie, respiratory tract, sputum) were used to identify sources in the hospital charge description master.

Results

A total of 152 132 patients were identified among 31 hospitals. Among these patients, 79 691 endotracheal aspirate cultures were collected on a ventilator-day (patients aged less than 1 year, 44%; 1-4 years, 27%, 5-11 years. 16%, and 12-18 years, 13%; 3% were Asian; 17% Hispanic; 21% non-Hispanic Black; 45% Non-Hispanic White patients; 14% were other; 56% of patients were male, 44% were female). The overall median rate of culture use was 46 per 1000 ventilator-days (IQR, 32-73 cultures per 1000 ventilator-days). The endotracheal aspirate culture rate was positively correlated with the hospital's antibiotic days of therapy rate (R = 0.46; P = .009). In a multivariable model adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level characteristics and among patients with mechanical ventilation, each additional endotracheal aspirate culture was associated with 2.87 (95% CI, 2.74-3.01) higher odds of receiving additional days of therapy compared with patients who did not receive and endotracheal aspirate culture.

Conclusions and relevance

In this study, notable variability was found in endotracheal aspirate culture rates across US pediatric hospitals and pediatric intensive care units, and endotracheal aspirate culture use was associated with increased antibiotic use. These findings suggest an opportunity for diagnostic and antibiotic stewardship to standardize testing and treatment of suspected ventilator-associated infections in pediatric patients with mechanical ventilation pediatric patients.

SUBMITTER: Prinzi A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8696566 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known, life-threatening disease that persists despite preventative measures and approved antibiotic therapies. This prospective observational study investigated bacterial airway colonization, and whether its detection and quantification in the endotracheal aspirate (ETA) is useful for identifying mechanically ventilated ICU patients who are at risk of developing VAP.Methods240 patients admitted to 3 ICUs at the Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (Burlington, MA) between June 2014 and June 2015 and mechanically ventilated for > 2 days were included. ETA samples and clinical data were collected. Airway colonization was assessed, and subsequently categorized into "heavy" and "light" by semi-quantitative microbiological analysis of ETAs. VAP was diagnosed retrospectively by the study sponsor according to a pre-specified pneumonia definition.ResultsPathogenic bacteria were isolated from ETAs of 125 patients. The most common species isolated was S. aureus (56.8%), followed by K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli (35.2% combined). VAP was diagnosed in 85 patients, 44 (51.7%) with no bacterial pathogen, 18 associated with S. aureus and 18 Gram-negative-only cases, and 5 associated with other Gram-positive or mixed species. A higher proportion of patients who were heavily colonized with S. aureus developed VAP (32.4%) associated with S. aureus compared to those lightly colonized (17.6%). The same tendency was seen for patients heavily and lightly colonized with Gram-negative pathogens (30.0 and 0.0%, respectively). Detection of S. aureus in the ETA preceded S. aureus VAP by approximately 4 days, while Gram-negative organisms were first detected 2.5 days prior to Gram-negative VAP. VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization regardless of microbiologic cause when compared to patients who did not develop VAP.ConclusionsThe overall VAP rate was 35%. Heavy tracheal colonization supported identification of patients at higher risk of developing a corresponding S. aureus or Gram-negative VAP. Detection of bacterial ETA-positivity tended to precede VAP.

Project description:In patients with acute respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube (ET) may be required to correct hypoxemia and hypercarbia. However, biofilm formation on these ETs is a risk factor for infections in intubated patients, as the ET can act as a reservoir of microorganisms that can cause infections in the lungs. As severely ill COVID-19 patients often need to be intubated, a better knowledge of the composition of ET biofilms in this population is important. In Spring 2020, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe, 31 ETs were obtained from COVID-19 patients at Ghent University Hospital (Ghent, Belgium). Biofilms were collected from the ET and the biofilm composition was determined using culture-dependent (MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and biochemical tests) and culture-independent (16S and ITS1 rRNA amplicon sequencing) approaches. In addition, antimicrobial resistance was assessed for isolates collected via the culture-dependent approach using disc diffusion for 11 antimicrobials commonly used to treat lower respiratory tract infections. The most common microorganisms identified by the culture-dependent approach were those typically found during lung infections and included both presumed commensal and potentially pathogenic microorganisms like Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans. More unusual organisms, such as Paracoccus yeei, were also identified, but each only in a few patients. The culture-independent approach revealed a wide variety of microbes present in the ET biofilms and showed large variation in biofilm composition between patients. Some biofilms contained a diverse set of bacteria of which many are generally considered as non-pathogenic commensals, whereas others were dominated by a single or a few pathogens. Antimicrobial resistance was widespread in the isolates, e.g. 68% and 53% of all isolates tested were resistant against meropenem and gentamicin, respectively. Different isolates from the same species recovered from the same ET biofilm often showed differences in antibiotic susceptibility. Our data suggest that ET biofilms are a potential risk factor for secondary infections in intubated COVID-19 patients, as is the case in mechanically-ventilated non-COVID-19 patients.

Project description:Background Mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have a mortality of 24-53%, in part due to distal mucopurulent secretions interfering with ventilation. Dornase alfa is recombinant human DNase 1 and digests DNA in mucoid sputum. Nebulized dornase alfa is FDA-approved for cystic fibrosis treatment. DNA from neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) contributes to the viscosity of mucopurulent secretions. NETs are found in the serum of patients with severe COVID-19, and targeting NETs reduces mortality in animal models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Thus, dornase alfa may be beneficial to patients with severe COVID-19, acting as a mucolytic and targeting NETs. However, delivery of nebulized drugs can aerosolize SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, increasing the infection risk for staff. Here, we report a single center case series where dornase alfa was administered through an in-line nebulizer system to minimize risk of virus aerosolization. Methods Demographic, clinical data, and outcomes were collected from the electronic medical records of five mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19, including three requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), treated with nebulized in-line endotracheal dornase alfa co-administered with albuterol (used to increase delivery to the alveoli), between March 31 and April 24, 2020. Data on tolerability and responses, including longitudinal values capturing respiratory function and inflammatory status, were analyzed. Results Following nebulized in-line administration of dornase alfa with albuterol, the fraction of inspired oxygen requirements was reduced for all five patients. All patients remain alive and two patients have been discharged from the intensive care unit. No drug associated toxicities were identified. Conclusions The results presented in this case series suggest that dornase alfa will be well-tolerated by critically ill patients with COVID-19. Clinical trials are required to formally test the dosing, safety, and efficacy of dornase alfa in COVID-19, and two have recently been registered ( NCT04359654 and NCT04355364 ). With this case series, we hope to contribute to the development of management approaches for critically ill patients with COVID-19.