Dataset Information

Spousal Concordance of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Newly Married Couples in China.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Several studies have shown that older married couples share a propensity for accruing the same cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia. However, it remains unclear if these spousal associations reflect their shared home environment and lifestyle or the tendency to choose a partner with a similar perspective on lifestyle choices and behaviors (assortative mating). Evaluating these associations in young, newly married couples may help to differentiate between these 2 possibilities.

Objective

To evaluate the spousal concordance of cardiovascular risk factors in young, newly married couples.

Design, setting, and participants

This prospective cohort study recruited 831 couples around the time of marriage registration in Liuyang, China, from February 1, 2009, to November 4, 2015. Statistical analysis was performed from April to May 2021.

Main outcomes and measures

Spousal concordance of cardiovascular risk factors. Both partners underwent systematic assessment of cardiovascular risk factors, including evaluation of anthropometrics, blood pressure, and fasting lipids.

Results

Among the 831 participating couples, mean (SD) age was 24 (3) years in the women and 26 (4) years in the men. There were significant correlations between spouses in systolic blood pressure (r = 0.43; P < .001), diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.36; P < .001), total cholesterol (r = 0.13; P < .001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (r = 0.11; P = .003), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (r = 0.22, P < .001), and triglycerides (r = 0.13; P = .001). After adjustment for covariates (age, household income, education level, smoking, and either body mass index or waist circumference), significant correlations persisted between spouses in their systolic blood pressure (r = 0.42; P < .001), diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.34; P < .001), HDL cholesterol (r = 0.17; P < .001), and triglycerides (r = 0.10; P = .04).

Conclusions and relevance

This cohort study found spousal concordance of cardiovascular risk factors among young newly married couples. Assortative mating based on these concordant risk factors at the time of marriage may partially explain the shared vascular risk profile of older marital partners and raises the possibility of couple-based care.

SUBMITTER: Retnakaran R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8696567 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceMarried couples and domestic partners have been reported to share similar environmental exposures, adopt similar behavior patterns, and have similar transferable characteristics. However, the degree to which couples share similar levels of cardiovascular risk factors and behaviors is uncertain.ObjectiveTo assess within-couple concordance of the American Heart Association-defined Life's Simple 7 (LS7).Design, setting, and participantsCross-sectional study with a longitudinal substudy of employees and spouses (or domestic partners) who participated in an employer-sponsored health assessment program throughout the United States between October 2014 and December 2018. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2019, to August 4, 2020.ExposuresHaving a spouse or domestic partner.Main outcomes and measuresThe LS7 risk factors and behaviors (smoking status, body mass index, exercise, diet, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting glucose) were assessed by questionnaires, examinations, and laboratory tests. LS7 categories were scored as 2 for ideal, 1 for intermediate, or 0 for poor and summed to generate a CV health score.ResultsThe study included 10 728 participants (5364 couples): 7% were African American, 11% Hispanic, 21% Asian, and 54% White (median [interquartile range] age, 50 [41-57] years for men and 47 [39-55] for women). For most couples, both members were in the ideal category or both were in a nonideal category. Concordance ranged from 53% (95% CI, 52%-54%) for cholesterol to 95% (95% CI, 94%-95%) for diet. For the CV health score, in 79% (95% CI, 78%-80%) of couples both members were in a nonideal category, which was associated mainly with unhealthy diet (94% [95% CI, 93%-94%] of couples) and inadequate exercise (53% [95% CI, 52%-55%] of couples). However, in most couples, both members were in the ideal category for smoking status (60% [95% CI, 59%-61%] of couples) and glucose (56% [95% CI, 55%-58%]). Except for total cholesterol, when 1 member of a couple was in the ideal category, the other member was likely also to be in the ideal category: the adjusted odds ratios for also being in the ideal category ranged from 1.3 (95% CI, 1.1-1.5; P ≤ .001) for blood pressure to 10.6 (95% CI, 7.4-15.3; P ≤ .001) for diet. Concordance differed by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. A 5-year longitudinal analysis of 2186 couples found modest changes in concordance of blood pressure (from 55% [95% CI, 53%-57%] to 59% [95% CI, 57%-61%]; P < .001 for trend) and fasting glucose (from 64% [95% CI, 62%-66%] to 59% [95% CI, 57%-61%]; P < .001 for trend) with no change in other factors.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, high concordance of nonideal behaviors was found within couples; behavioral modification programs may benefit both the targeted and the nontargeted member of a couple.

Project description:ImportanceFunctional limitation is increasingly common as people age and is often associated with negative consequences. Evidence of the dynamics of functional limitation within couples in China is still inadequate.ObjectivesTo examine whether functional limitation was associated within middle-aged and older couples and to explore sex differences in spousal associations.Design, setting, and participantsIn this nationwide, population-based cohort study performed from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2018, participants were selected using multistage probability sampling, and 5207 community-dwelling couples (10 414 individuals) 45 years or older were included in the nationally representative China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Data analysis was performed from January 1 to February 28, 2021.ExposuresThe exposure variable was the presence of functional limitation in spouses. Functional limitation was measured by the activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities‎ of daily ‎living (IADLs) scales and was defined as having difficulty in independently performing at least 1 ADL or IADL item.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcome was functional limitation in index participants. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to estimate the reciprocal association of functional limitation within couples over time.ResultsA total of 5207 married, different-sex couples (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [8.8] years for husbands and 57.0 [8.2] years for wives) were included in the study. For husbands, the number (percentage) of participants classified with baseline functional limitation was 1140 (21.9%), the number (percentage) with ADL limitation was 684 (13.1%), and the number (percentage) with IADL limitation was 834 (16.0%). For wives, the number (percentage) of participants classified with baseline functional limitation was 1502 (28.8%), the number (percentage) with ADL limitation was 887 (17.0%), and the number (percentage) with IADL limitation was 1183 (22.7%). Longitudinal results demonstrated an association in spouses developing functional limitation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.55; 95% CI, 2.41-2.69; P < .001), ADL limitation (adjusted OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 2.11-2.41; P < .001), and IADL limitation (adjusted OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.43-2.73; P < .001). Subgroup analyses by sex revealed similar patterns of spousal health concordance in terms of all studied outcomes, indicating no sex specificity.Conclusions and relevanceThis population-based cohort study suggests that among Chinese middle-aged and older couples there is significant concordance in the development of functional limitation. This study of spousal functional ability from a dyadic perspective may help in the understanding of health risks within a wider familial context and offers novel insights for prioritizing policy focus from individual centered to couple based.