Dataset Information

Complementary Feeding and Growth in Infants Born Preterm: A 12 Months Follow-Up Study.

ABSTRACT: Evidences demonstrated that timing of weaning influences long-term growth in full term infants. However, studies on preterm infants are still lacking, and the international guidelines are focused only on healthy full-term newborn, without consensus for preterms. We aimed at evaluating, in a cohort study, the consequences of different timing of weaning on auxological outcomes up to 12 months of corrected age in a population of neonates born with gestational age < 32 weeks or birth weight < 1500 g. We divided the enrolled neonates in two cohorts according to the timing of weaning: (i) Early Weaning: introduction of complementary food before 6 months of corrected age; (ii) Late Weaning: complementary food introduced after 6 months of corrected age. Growth parameters (weight, length, body mass index, and ponderal index) were measured at 12 months of life. The two groups were statistically comparable for baseline clinical characteristics, and differences on growth parameters were not reported between the two study groups. These results were confirmed in linear and binary logistic regression multivariate models. Timing of weaning is not related to growth of preterm newborns in the first 12 months of corrected age. Studies are needed to reach consensus for the appropriate nutritional approach for preterm babies after discharge.

SUBMITTER: Boscarino G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8700469 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Complementary Feeding and Growth in Infants Born Preterm: A 12 Months Follow-Up Study.

Boscarino Giovanni G Conti Maria Giulia MG Pagano Federica F Di Chiara Maria M Pannucci Chiara C Onestà Elisa E Prota Rita R Deli Giorgia G Dito Lucia L Regoli Daniela D Oliva Salvatore S Terrin Gianluca G

Children (Basel, Switzerland) 20211124 12

Evidences demonstrated that timing of weaning influences long-term growth in full term infants. However, studies on preterm infants are still lacking, and the international guidelines are focused only on healthy full-term newborn, without consensus for preterms. We aimed at evaluating, in a cohort study, the consequences of different timing of weaning on auxological outcomes up to 12 months of corrected age in a population of neonates born with gestational age < 32 weeks or birth weight < 1500 g ...[more]

PMID: 34943281

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEvidence on the optimal time to initiation of complementary feeding in preterm infants is scarce. We examined the effect of initiation of complementary feeding at 4 months versus 6 months of corrected age on weight for age at 12 months corrected age in preterm infants less than 34 weeks of gestation.MethodsIn this open-label, randomised trial, we enrolled infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation with no major malformation from three public health facilities in India. Eligible infants were tracked from birth and randomly assigned (1:1) at 4 months corrected age to receive complementary feeding at 4 months corrected age (4 month group), or continuation of milk feeding and initiation of complementary feeding at 6 months corrected age (6 month group), using computer generated randomisation schedule of variable block size, stratified by gestation (30 weeks or less, and 31-33 weeks). Iron supplementation was provided as standard. Participants and the implementation team could not be masked to group assignment, but outcome assessors were masked. Primary outcome was weight for age Z-score at 12 months corrected age (WAZ12) based on WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study growth standards. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India, number CTRI/2012/11/003149.FindingsBetween March 20, 2013, and April 24, 2015, 403 infants were randomly assigned: 206 to receive complementary feeding from 4 months and 197 to receive complementary feeding from 6 months. 22 infants in the 4 month group (four deaths, two withdrawals, 16 lost to follow-up) and eight infants in the 6 month group (two deaths, six lost to follow-up) were excluded from analysis of primary outcome. There was no difference in WAZ12 between two groups: -1·6 (SD 1·2) in the 4 month group versus -1·6 (SD 1·3) in the 6 month group (mean difference 0·005, 95% CI -0·24 to 0·25; p=0·965). There were more hospital admissions in the 4 month group compared with the 6 month group: 2·5 episodes per 100 infant-months in the 4 month group versus 1·4 episodes per 100 infant-months in the 6 month group (incidence rate ratio 1·8, 95% CI 1·0-3·1, p=0·03). 34 (18%) of 188 infants in the 4 month group required hospital admission, compared with 18 (9%) of 192 infants in the 6 month group.InterpretationAlthough there was no evidence of effect for the primary endpoint of WAZ12, the higher rate of hospital admission in the 4 month group suggests a recommendation to initiate complementary feeding at 6 months over 4 months of corrected age in infants less than 34 weeks of gestation.FundingIndian Council of Medical Research supported the study until Nov 14, 2015. Subsequently, Shuchita Gupta's salary was supported for 2 months by an institute fellowship from All India Institute Of Medical Sciences, and a grant by Wellcome Trust thereafter.

Project description:AimTo evaluate the predictive validity of the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE) performed early (at 32 weeks postmenstrual age) and at term-equivalent age (TEA) for 12-month motor outcomes in infants born very preterm.MethodThis was a diagnostic study using data from a prospective birth cohort. A total of 104 infants born preterm at less than 31 weeks gestational age (males n = 61; mean = 28 weeks 1 day [SD 1 week 6 days], range 23 weeks 1 day-30 weeks 6 days) underwent HNNE early and at TEA, which were scored by comparison with term data. Motor outcomes at 12 months corrected age were determined using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (scores ≤85). Cut-off points were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves.ResultsSixteen (15%) infants born preterm had motor impairment at 12 months corrected age. The HNNE total score cut-off points with the best combination of sensitivity and specificity at early and TEA assessments were 15.2 or lower (sensitivity 77%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 46%-95%; specificity 74%, 95% CI = 63%-83%) and 23.5 or lower (sensitivity 67%, 95% CI = 38%-88%; specificity 66%, 95% CI = 54%-76%) respectively. The most predictive subscale at the early assessment was reflexes (sensitivity 86%, 95% CI = 57%-98%; specificity 62%, 95% CI = 51%-72%; cut-off point ≤3); at TEA, it was spontaneous movements (sensitivity 73%, 95% CI = 45%-92%; specificity 60%, 95% CI = 48%-70%; cut-off point ≤2).InterpretationThe HNNE provides moderate predictive accuracy for motor outcome at 12 months corrected age in infants born very preterm. Although modest at both time points, early assessment had stronger predictive ability for motor outcomes than TEA when scored using term data, highlighting the value of performing the HNNE earlier in the neonatal period. Performing HNNE earlier may assist risk stratification when planning follow-up services.

Dataset Information

Complementary Feeding and Growth in Infants Born Preterm: A 12 Months Follow-Up Study.

Publications

Complementary Feeding and Growth in Infants Born Preterm: A 12 Months Follow-Up Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets