Adjusted Morbidity Groups and Intracerebral Haemorrhage: A Retrospective Primary Care Cohort Study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Intracerebral haemorrhage rates are increasing among highly complex, elderly patients. The main objective of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors of intracerebral haemorrhage.Methods
Multicentre, retrospective, community-based cohort study was conducted, including patients in the Adjusted Morbidity Group 4 with no history of intracerebral haemorrhage. Cases were obtained from electronic clinical records of the Catalan Institute of Health and were followed up for five years. The primary outcome was the occurrence of intracerebral haemorrhage during the study period. Demographic, clinical and pharmacological variables were included. Logistic regression analyses were carried out to detect prognostic variables for intracerebral haemorrhage.Results
4686 subjects were included; 170 (3.6%) suffered an intracerebral haemorrhage (85.8/10,000 person-year [95% CI 85.4 to 86.2]). The HAS-BLED score for intracerebral haemorrhage risk detection obtained the best AUC (0.7) when used in the highest complexity level (cut-off point ≥3). Associated independent risk factors were age ≥80 years, high complexity and use of antiplatelet agents.Conclusions
The Adjusted Morbidity Group 4 is associated with a high risk of intracerebral haemorrhage, particularly for highly complex patients and the use of antiplatelet agents. The risk of bleeding in these patients must be closely monitored.
SUBMITTER: Lorman-Carbo B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8702076 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:The Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA) is a new morbidity measurement developed and adapted to the Spanish healthcare System. It enables the population to be classified into 6 morbidity groups, and in turn divided into 5 levels of complexity, along with one healthy population group. Consequently, the population is divided into 31 mutually exclusive categories. The results of the stratification in Catalonia are presented. GMA is a method for grouping morbidity that is comparable to others in the field, but has been developed with data from the Spanish health system. It can be used to stratify the population and to identify target populations. It has good explanatory and predictive results in the use of health resources indicators. The Spanish Ministry of Health is promoting the introduction of the GMA into the National Health System.
| S-EPMC6879171 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo examine the association between high haemoglobin levels and outcomes in intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in a multicentre cohort study.DesignProspective multicentre cohort study.Settings21 tertiary hospitals across mainland China.ParticipantsA total of 5318 consecutive in-hospital spontaneous ICH patients were recruited between January 2012 and June 2016.Primary and secondary outcome measuresHaemoglobin levels were measured on admission. Binary or ordinary logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent relationship of haemoglobin level with clinical outcomes at 3 months, measured as death or disability. Restricted cubic spline regression was fitted to examine the potential non-linear shape of the dose-response curve between the whole haemoglobin levels and 3-month poor outcomes.ResultsA total of 5031 patients with ICH were analysed (64.3% male; mean age (SD), 57.8 (15.2) years). We found that the highest haemoglobin quintile was associated with poor outcomes 3 months in males (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.65, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.25) but not in females, which was also observed in the pooled analysis of three subcohorts in male patients (average aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.33). The spline regression suggested a non-linear association between haemoglobin levels and outcomes and a linear relationship was observed between an elevated haemoglobin level and 3-month disability/death in males (haemoglobin level per 10 g/L: aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.40, p<0.001), which was mediated by larger haematoma volume (effect size: 0.115, 95% CI 0.012 to 0.231).ConclusionsThis study found a sex-specific association between an elevated haemoglobin level and poor 3-month outcomes, which might be mediated by larger haematoma volume.
| S-EPMC8728416 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsTo describe the characteristics of patients with chronic conditions according to their risk levels assigned by the adjusted morbidity groups (AMG). To analyse the factors associated with a high risk level and to study their effect.DesignObservational cross-sectional study with an analytical focus.LocationPrimary care (PC), Madrid Health Service.ParticipantsPopulation of 18,107 patients stratified by their risk levels with the AMG in the computerised clinical records of Madrid PC.Main measurementsThe variables studied were: socio-demographic, clinical-nursing care and use of services. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analysis were performed.ResultsOf the 18,107 patients, 9,866(54.4%) were identified as chronic patients, with 444 (4.5%) stratified as high risk, 1784 (18,1%) as medium risk, and 7,638 (77.4%) as low risk. The high risk patients, compared with medium and low risk, had an older mean age [77.8 (SD=12.9), 72.1 (SD=12.9), 50.6 (SD=19.4)], lower percentage of women (52.3%, 65%, 61.1%), a higher number of chronic diseases [6.7 (SD=2.4), 4.3 (SD=1.5), 1.9 (SD=1.1)], polymedication (79.1%, 43.3%, 6.2%), and contact with PC [33.9 (28), 21.4 (17.3), 7.9 (9.9)] (P<.01). In the multivariate analysis, the high risk level was independently related to age>65 [1.43 (1.03-1.99), male gender (OR=3.46, 95% CI=2.64-4.52), immobility (OR=6.33, 95% CI=4.40-9.11), number of chronic conditions (OR=2.60, 95% CI=2.41-2.81), and PC contact>7 times (OR=1.95, 95% CI=1.36-2.80)] (P<.01).ConclusionsMore than half of the population is classified by the AMG as a chronic, and it is stratified into 3 risk levels that show differences in gender, age, functional impairment, need for care, morbidity, complexity, and use of Primary Care services. Age>65, male gender, immobility, number of chronic conditions, and contact with PC>7 times were the factors associated with high risk.
| S-EPMC7025976 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPatients with chronic diseases have increased needs for assistance and care. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics and use of primary care (PC) and hospital care (HC) health services by chronic patients according to risk level based on adjusted morbidity groups (AMG) and to analyze the associated factors.MethodsCross-sectional descriptive observational study. Patients from a basic health area classified as chronically ill by the AMG classification system of the Madrid PC electronic medical record were included. Sociodemographic, clinical-care characteristics (classified as predisposing factors or need factors) and service utilization variables were collected. Univariate, bivariate and simple linear regression analyses were performed.ResultsThe sample consisted of 9866 chronic patients and 8332 (84.4%) used health services. Of these service users, 63% were women, mean age was 55.7 (SD = 20.8), 439 (5.3%) were high risk, 1746 (21.2%) were medium risk, and 6041(73.4%) were low risk. A total of 8226 (98.7%) were PC users, and 4284 (51.4%) were HC users. The average number of annual contacts with PC was 13.9 (SD = 15); the average number of contacts with HC was 4.8 (SD = 6.2). Predisposing factors associated with services utilization at both care levels were: age (B coefficient [BC] = 0.03 and 0.018, 95% CI = 0.017-0.052 and 0.008-0.028, respectively, for PC and HC) and Spanish origin (BC = 0.962 and 3.396, 95% CI = 0.198-1.726 and 2.722-4.070); need factors included: palliative care (BC = 10,492 and 5047; 95% CI = 6457-14,526 and 3098-6995), high risk (BC = 4631 and 2730, 95% CI = 3022-6241 and 1.949-3.512), number of chronic diseases (BC = 1.291 and 0.222, 95% CI = 1.068-1.51 and 0.103-0.341) and neoplasms (BC = 2.989 and 4.309, 95% CI = 1.659-4.319 and 3.629-4.989).ConclusionsThe characteristics and PC and HC service utilization of chronic patients were different and varied according to their AMG risk level. There was greater use of PC services than HC services, although utilization of both levels of care was high. Service use was related to predisposing factors such as age and country of origin and, above all, to need factors such as immobility, high risk, and number and type of chronic diseases that require follow-up and palliative care.
| S-EPMC8487403 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWithin the Dutch health care system the focus is shifting from a disease oriented approach to a more population based approach. Since every inhabitant in the Netherlands is registered with one general practice, this offers a unique possibility to perform Population Health Management analyses based on general practitioners' (GP) registries. The Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) System is an internationally used method for predictive population analyses. The model categorizes individuals based on their complete health profile, taking into account age, gender, diagnoses and medication. However, the ACG system was developed with non-Dutch data. Consequently, for wider implementation in Dutch general practice, the system needs to be validated in the Dutch healthcare setting. In this paper we show the results of the first use of the ACG system on Dutch GP data. The aim of this study is to explore how well the ACG system can distinguish between different levels of GP healthcare utilization.MethodsTo reach our aim, two variables of the ACG System, the Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADG) and the mutually exclusive ACG categories were explored. The population for this pilot analysis consisted of 23,618 persons listed with five participating general practices within one region in the Netherlands. ACG analyses were performed based on historical Electronic Health Records data from 2014 consisting of primary care diagnoses and pharmaceutical data. Logistic regression models were estimated and AUC's were calculated to explore the diagnostic value of the models including ACGs and ADGs separately with GP healthcare utilization as the dependent variable. The dependent variable was categorized using four different cut-off points: zero, one, two and three visits per year.ResultsThe ACG and ADG models performed as well as models using International Classification of Primary Care chapters, regarding the association with GP utilization. AUC values were between 0.79 and 0.85. These models performed better than the base model (age and gender only) which showed AUC values between 0.64 and 0.71.ConclusionThe results of this study show that the ACG system is a useful tool to stratify Dutch primary care populations with GP healthcare utilization as the outcome variable.
| S-EPMC7945308 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionAdjusted Morbidity Groups (GMAs) and the Clinical Risk Groups (CRGs) are population morbidity based stratification tools which classify patients into mutually exclusive categories.ObjetiveTo compare the stratification provided by the GMAs, CRGs and that carried out by the evaluators according to the levels of complexity.DesignRandom sample stratified by morbidity risk.LocationCatalonia.ParticipantsForty paired general practitioners in the primary care, matched pairs.InterventionsEach pair of evaluators had to review 25 clinical records.Main outputsThe concordance by evaluators, and between the evaluators and the results obtained by the 2 morbidity tools were evaluated according to the kappa index, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predicted values.ResultsThe concordance between general practitioners pairs was around the kappa value 0.75 (mean value=0.67), between the GMA and the evaluators was similar (mean value=0.63), and higher than for the CRG (mean value=0.35). The general practitioners gave a score of 7.5 over 10 to both tools, although for the most complex strata, according to the professionals' assignment, the GMA obtained better scores than the CRGs. The professionals preferred the GMAs over the CRGs. These differences increased with the complexity level of the patients according to clinical criteria. Overall, less than 2% of serious classification errors were found by both groupers.ConclusionThe evaluators considered that both grouping systems classified the studied population satisfactorily, although the GMAs showed a better performance for more complex strata. In addition, the clinical raters preferred the GMAs in most cases.
| S-EPMC7025994 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionBlood pressure (BP) lowering reduces the risk of recurrent stroke after intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). However, implementation of BP lowering in clinical practice in the UK is unknown.Patients and methodsWe identified adults with first-ever incident ICH to quantify the proportion who survived >14 days after hospital discharge and were prescribed BP-lowering medication in a prospective, population-based, inception cohort study in the Lothian region of Scotland during June 2010-May 2012 and January-December 2019. After the first cohort, we analysed reasons for avoiding BP-lowering medication in a sample from the Lothian region of the Scottish Stroke Care Audit during January 2017-November 2017, which informed a quality improvement intervention that was implemented in the second cohort.ResultsAfter efforts to improve monitoring and lowering of BP amongst ICH survivors, there was an increase in the proportion of patients prescribed BP-lowering medication at hospital discharge between the first and second population-based cohorts (81/130 [62%] vs. 68/89 [76%]; P = 0.028). Compared with patients not prescribed BP-lowering medication at hospital discharge, patients prescribed BP-lowering medication presented with higher systolic BP (177 vs. 156 mm Hg, P = 0.002 and 180 vs. 149 mm Hg, P < 0.001, in the first and second population-based cohorts, respectively), and were more likely to have pre-morbid hypertension (85% vs. 33%, P < 0.001 and 72% vs. 29%, P < 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (35% vs. 4%, P < 0.001 and 26% vs. 5%, P < 0.034).ConclusionIn this population-based study, the proportion of patients with ICH who were prescribed BP-lowering medication at hospital discharge increased after a quality improvement intervention.
| S-EPMC7995321 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe incidence of diabetes in the general US population (6.7 per 1000 adults in 2018) has not changed significantly since 2000, suggesting that individuals with prediabetes are not connecting to evidence-based interventions.ObjectiveWe sought to describe the clinical care of individuals with prediabetes, determine patient factors associated with this care, and evaluate risk for diabetes development.DesignRetrospective cohort study using linked claims and electronic health record data.ParticipantsWe created a cohort of adults with prediabetes based on laboratory measures. We excluded patients with a prior history of diabetes, pregnancy in prior 6 months, or recent steroid use.Main measuresWe measured ordering and completion of clinical services targeting prediabetes management and diabetes incidence within 12 months following cohort entry. We tested the strength of the association between individuals' characteristics and outcomes of interest using bivariate and multiple logistic regression.ResultsOur cohort included 3888 patients with a laboratory diagnosis of prediabetes (incident or prevalent prediabetes). Within 12 months, 63.4% had repeat glycemic testing, yet only 10.4% had coded diagnoses of prediabetes, 1.0% were referred for nutrition services, and 5.4% were prescribed metformin. Most patients completed labs and nutrition visits when referred and filled metformin when prescribed. Individuals with a higher glycemic level or BMI were more likely to receive prediabetes clinical care. Six percent of individuals developed diabetes within 12 months of cohort entry and had higher glycemic levels and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. In the adjusted model, Black individuals had 1.4 times higher odds of developing diabetes than White individuals.ConclusionsRates of prediabetes clinical care activities are low and have not improved. Strategies are urgently needed to improve prediabetes care delivery thereby preventing or delaying incident diabetes.
| S-EPMC8890680 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo identify factors associated with the decision to transfer and/or operate on patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) at a UK regional neurosurgical centre and test whether these decisions were associated with patient survival.DesignRetrospective cohort study.Setting14 acute and specialist hospitals served by the neurosurgical unit at Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.ParticipantsAll patients referred acutely to neurosurgery from January 2008 to October 2010.Outcome measuresPrimary outcome was survival and secondary outcomes were transfer to the neurosurgical centre and acute neurosurgery.ResultsWe obtained clinical data from 1364 consecutive spontaneous patients with ICH and 1175 cases were included in the final analysis. 140 (12%) patients were transferred and 75 (6%) had surgery. In a multifactorial analysis, the decision to transfer was more likely with younger age, women, brainstem and cerebellar location and larger haematomas. Risk of death in the following year was higher with advancing age, lower Glasgow Coma Scale, larger haematomas, brainstem ICH and intraventricular haemorrhage. The transferred patients had a lower risk of death relative to those remaining at the referring centre whether they had surgery (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.67) or not (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.73). Acute management decisions were included in the regression model for the 227 patients under either stroke medicine or neurosurgery at the neurosurgical centre and early do-not-resuscitate orders accounted for much of the observed difference, independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 4.8, 95% CI 2.7 to 8.6).ConclusionsThe clear association between transfer to a specialist centre and survival, independent of established prognostic factors, suggests aggressive supportive care at a specialist centre may improve survival in ICH and warrants further investigation in prospective studies.
| S-EPMC3884585 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn-hospital care of chronic patients is based on their characteristics and risk levels. Adjusted morbidity groups (AMG) is a population stratification tool which is currently being used in Primary Care but not in Hospitals. The objectives of this study were to describe the use of hospital services by chronic patients according to their risk levels assigned by AMG and to analyze influencing variables.Material and methodsIn this cross-sectional study, patients aged ≥18 years from a healthcare service area classified as chronically ill by the AMG classification system who used their referral hospital services from June 2015 to June 2016 were included. Predisposing and needs factors were collected. Univariate, bivariate and multiple linear regressions were performed.ResultsOf the 9,443 chronic patients identified (52.1% of the population in the selected area), 4,143 (43.9%) used hospital care services. Their mean age was 62.1 years (standard deviation (SD) = 18.4); 61.8% were female; 9% were high risk; 30% were medium risk, and 61% were low risk. The mean number of hospital service contacts was 5.0 (SD = 6.2), with 3.8 (SD = 4.3) visits to outpatient clinic, 0.7 (SD = 1.2) visits to emergency departments, 0.3 (SD = 2.8) visits to day hospital, and 0.2 (SD = 0.5) hospitalizations. The factors associated with greater service use were predisposing factors such as age (coefficient B (CB) = 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.01-0.05) and Spanish origin (CB = 3.9; 95% CI = 3.2-4.6). Among the needs factors were palliative care (CB = 4.8; 95% CI = 2.8-6.7), primary caregiver status (CB = 2.3; 95% CI = 0.7-3.9), a high risk level (CB = 2.9; 95% CI = 2.1-3.6), multimorbidity (CB = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.4-1.3), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (CB = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.8-2.3), depression (CB = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.3-1.3), active cancer (CB = 4.4, 95% CI = 3.7-5.1), and polymedication (CB = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.5-1.7).ConclusionsThe use of hospital services by chronic patients was high and increased with the risk level assigned by the AMG. The most frequent type of contact was outpatient consultation. Use was increased with predisposing factors such as age and geographic origin and by needs factors such as multimorbidity, risk level and severe diseases requiring follow-up, home care, and palliative care.
| S-EPMC8812854 | biostudies-literature