Primary Podocytopathies After COVID-19 Vaccination.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Timmermans SAMEG
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8702635 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Primary Podocytopathies After COVID-19 Vaccination.
Timmermans Sjoerd A M E G SAMEG Busch Matthias H MH Abdul-Hamid Myrurgia A MA Frenken Leon A M LAM Aarnoudse Albert-Jan AJ van Paassen Pieter P
Kidney international reports 20211224 4
Similar Datasets
Project description:RNA was extracted from whole blood of subjects collected in Tempus tubes prior to COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination. D01 and D21 correspond to samples collected at pre-dose 1 and pre-dose 2 respectively. RNA was also extracted from blood collected at indicated time points post-vaccination. DB1, DB2, DB4 and DB7 correspond to booster day 1 (pre-booster), booster day 2, booster day 4 and booster day 7 respectively. The case subject experienced cardiac complication following mRNA booster vaccination. We performed gene expression analysis of case versus controls over time.
2023-03-20 | E-MTAB-12829 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccines are available for adolescents in the United States, but many parents are hesitant to have their children vaccinated. The advice of primary care professionals strongly influences vaccine uptake.ObjectiveWe examined the willingness of primary care professionals (PCPs) to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for adolescents.MethodsParticipants were a national sample of 1,047 US adolescent primary care professionals. They participated in an online survey in early 2021, after a COVID-19 vaccine had been approved for adults but before approval for adolescents. Respondents included physicians (71%), advanced practice providers (17%), and nurses (12%). We identified correlates of willingness to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for adolescents using logistic regression.ResultsThe majority (89%) of respondents were willing to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for adolescents, with advanced practice providers and nurses being less likely than paediatricians to recommend vaccination (84% vs. 94%, aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.92). Respondents who had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine were more likely to recommend adolescent vaccination (92% vs. 69%, aOR 4.20, 95% CI 2.56-6.87) as were those with more years in practice (94% vs. 88%, aOR 2.93, 95% CI 1.79-4.99). Most respondents (96%) said they would need some measure of support in order to provide COVID-19 vaccination to adolescents, with vaccine safety and efficacy information being the most commonly cited need (80%).ConclusionAdolescent primary care professionals were generally willing to recommend COVID-19 vaccination. However, most indicated a need for additional resources to be able to administer COVID-19 vaccines at their clinic.
| S-EPMC9213918 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Podocytopathies are kidney diseases in which direct or indirect podocyte injury drives proteinuria or nephrotic syndrome. In children and young adults, genetic variants in >50 podocyte-expressed genes, syndromal non-podocyte-specific genes and phenocopies with other underlying genetic abnormalities cause podocytopathies associated with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome or severe proteinuria. A variety of genetic variants likely contribute to disease development. Among genes with non-Mendelian inheritance, variants in APOL1 have the largest effect size. In addition to genetic variants, environmental triggers such as immune-related, infection-related, toxic and haemodynamic factors and obesity are also important causes of podocyte injury and frequently combine to cause various degrees of proteinuria in children and adults. Typical manifestations on kidney biopsy are minimal change lesions and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions. Standard treatment for primary podocytopathies manifesting with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis lesions includes glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive drugs; individuals not responding with a resolution of proteinuria have a poor renal prognosis. Renin-angiotensin system antagonists help to control proteinuria and slow the progression of fibrosis. Symptomatic management may include the use of diuretics, statins, infection prophylaxis and anticoagulation. This Primer discusses a shift in paradigm from patient stratification based on kidney biopsy findings towards personalized management based on clinical, morphological and genetic data as well as pathophysiological understanding.
| S-EPMC8162925 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectiveResearch in several countries shows higher Covid-19 vaccination willingness and uptake among physicians than nurses. Our paper aims to characterize and explain this difference.MethodsIn early 2021, we surveyed 1047 U.S. primary care professionals who served adolescents, ages 11-17. The national sample included physicians (71%) as well as nurses and advanced practice providers. The survey assessed the three domains of the Increasing Vaccination Model: thinking and feeling, social processes, and direct behavior change.ResultsCovid-19 vaccine uptake was higher among physicians than among nurses and advanced practice providers (91% vs. 76%, p < .05). Overall, in the thinking and feeling domain, higher confidence in Covid-19 vaccination, higher perceived susceptibility to the disease, and stronger anticipated regret were associated with higher vaccine uptake (all p < .05). In the social processes domain, perceiving more positive social norms for Covid-19 vaccination, receiving recommendations to get the vaccine, and wanting to help others were associated with higher vaccine uptake (all p < .05). In the direct behavior change domain, receiving an invitation to get the vaccine and better access to vaccination were associated with higher uptake (both p < .05). Of these variables, most of the thinking and feeling and social processes variables mediated the association of training with vaccine uptake.ConclusionsPhysicians had higher Covid-19 vaccine uptake than nurses and advanced practice providers, corresponding with their more supportive vaccine beliefs and social experiences. Efforts to reach the remaining unvaccinated cohort can build on these findings.
| S-EPMC8933282 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This SuperSeries is composed of the SubSeries listed below.
2023-01-04 | GSE222128 | GEO
Project description:The durability of immune responses after COVID-19 vaccination will drive long-term vaccine effectiveness across settings and may differ by vaccine type. To determine durability of protection of COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S) following primary vaccination in the United States, a matched case-control study was conducted in three cohorts between 1 January and 7 September 2021 using de-identified data from a database covering 168 million lives. Odds ratios (ORs) for developing outcomes of interest (breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, or intensive care unit admission) were determined for each vaccine (no direct comparisons). In total, 17,017,435 individuals were identified. Relative to the baseline, stable protection was observed for Ad26.COV2.S against infections (OR [95% confidence interval (CI)], 1.31 [1.18-1.47]) and hospitalizations (OR [95% CI], 1.25 [0.86-1.80]). Relative to the baseline, protection waned over time against infections for BNT162b2 (OR [95% CI], 2.20 [2.01-2.40]) and mRNA-1273 (OR [95% CI], 2.07 [1.87-2.29]) and against hospitalizations for BNT162b2 (OR [95% CI], 2.38 [1.79-3.17]). Baseline protection remained stable for intensive care unit admissions for all three vaccines. Calculated baseline VE was consistent with published literature. This study suggests that the three vaccines in three separate populations may have different durability profiles.
| S-EPMC9505933 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8825564 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8489290 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundData on the durability of booster dose immunity of COVID-19 vaccines are relatively limited.MethodsImmunogenicity was evaluated for up to 9-12 months after the third dose of vaccination in 94 healthy adults.ResultsFollowing the third dose, the anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody response against the wild-type was boosted markedly, which decreased gradually over time. However, even 9-12 months after the booster dose, both the median and geometric mean of anti-spike IgG antibody levels were higher than those measured 4 weeks after the second dose. Breakthrough infection during the Omicron-dominant period boosted neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron sublineages (BA.1 and BA.5) and the ancestral strain. T-cell immune response was efficiently induced and maintained during the study period.ConclusionsmRNA vaccine booster dose elicited durable humoral immunity for up to 1 year after the third dose and T-cell immunity was sustained during the study period, supporting an annual COVID-19 vaccination strategy.
| S-EPMC10926122 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and study aims
COVID-19 is a condition caused by the coronavirus (called SARS-CoV-2) that was first identified in late 2019. This virus can infect the respiratory (breathing) system. Some people do not have symptoms but can carry the virus and pass it on to others. People who have developed the condition may develop a fever and/or a continuous cough among other symptoms. This can develop into pneumonia. Pneumonia is a chest infection where the small air pockets of the lungs, called alveoli, fill with liquid and make it more difficult to breathe.
Nearly 32 million people in the UK have received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Research shows that this prevents infection in over 90% of people. However, these vaccines were tested in healthy people. Recent research in individuals with chronic health problems or cancer suggests that 30% are generating low antibody or T-cells (a type of white blood cell which fights infection) levels after two doses of the Pfizer or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines. This raises the question of the potential benefit of a third dose (re-boost) of the vaccine in these vulnerable patients. A re-boost strategy has been successfully used for other vaccines but the limited research performed to date for COVID-19 has given variable results, so additional research is needed. This study aims to find out whether a re-boost vaccine strategy can induce an immune response in clinically vulnerable patients who have not produced an adequate antibody response after two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.
Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 and over who have not produced an adequate antibody response after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and have one of the following diseases:
1. Breast or lung cancer
2. Certain types of blood cancer
3. Immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
4. Chronic kidney disease
5. Chronic liver disease
6. Inflammatory bowel disease on immune suppressive therapy
7. Stem cell transplant
8. Primary immunodeficiency (a group of disorders characterized by poor or absent immune function)
What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to receive an additional dose of Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (the main study) or, for a sub-set of patients with blood cancer, the Pfizer or Moderna or Novavax vaccine. Blood samples will be collected before and 21 days after the re-boost vaccine and the level of antibodies and T-cells determined. Patients will be followed up for 3 months to see if they go on to develop COVID-19.
| 2411337 | ecrin-mdr-crc