Dataset Information

Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Identification in Infected Foot Ulcers.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Accurate identification of primary pathogens in foot infections remains challenging due to the diverse microbiome. Conventional culture may show false-positive or false-negative growth, leading to ineffective postoperative antibiotic treatment. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been explored as an alternative to standard culture in orthopedic infections. NGS is highly sensitive and can detect an entire bacterial genome along with genes conferring antibiotic resistance in a given sample. We investigated the potential use of NGS for accurate identification and quantification of microbes in infected diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). We hypothesize that NGS will aid identification of dominant pathogen and provide a more complete profile of microorganisms in infected DFUs compared to the standard culture method.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected from 30 infected DFU patients who underwent operative treatment by a fellowship-trained orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon from October 2018 to September 2019. The average age of the patient was 60.4 years. Operative procedures performed were irrigation and debridement (12), toe or ray amputation (13), calcanectomies (4), and below-the-knee amputation (1). Infected bone specimens were obtained intraoperatively and processed for standard culture and NGS. Concordance between the standard culture and NGS was assessed.

Results

In 29 of 30 patients, pathogens were identified by both NGS and culture, with a concordance rate of 70%. In standard culture, Staphylococcus aureus (58.6%) was the most common pathogen, followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (24.1%), Corynebacterium striatum (17.2%), and Enterococcus faecalis (17.2%). In NGS, Finegoldia magna (44.8%) was the most common microorganism followed by S. aureus (41.4%), and Anaerococcus vaginalis (24.1%). On average, NGS revealed 5.1 (range, 1-11) pathogens in a given sample, whereas culture revealed 2.6 (range, 1-6) pathogens.

Conclusion

NGS is an emerging molecular diagnostic method of microbial identification in orthopedic infection. It frequently provides different profiles of microorganisms along with antibiotic-resistant gene information compared to conventional culture in polymicrobial foot infection. Clinical use of NGS for management of foot and ankle infections warrants further investigation.

Level of evidence

Level II, diagnostic study.

SUBMITTER: Choi Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8702686 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is a widely used method for the diagnosis of meningitis, but its detection sensitivity is low. Several new methods have been developed for pathogen detection, including metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and pathogen-targeted NGS (ptNGS). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the performance of ptNGS in pathogen detection in CSF.MethodsCSF specimens were acquired from 38 patients with meningitis who were diagnosed at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University between October 2020 and February 2021. DNA was extracted from the CSF samples, and pathogens were identified using both ptNGS and mNGS. SPSS 22.0 software was used to compare the pathogen detection performance of ptNGS and mNGS in CSF.ResultsAmong the 38 patients with meningitis, 14 had a non-infectious disease (NID) and 24 had an infectious disease (ID). Of the 38 samples, both ptNGS and mNGS detected 9 (23.7%) positive samples, and 12 (31.6%) negative samples. Thirteen (34.2%) samples were detected to be positive by ptNGS only, and 4 (10.5%) were detected to be positive by mNGS only. The positivity rate detected by ptNGS for the ID group was higher than that detected by mNGS (P=0.080), and the positivity rates detected by ptNGS and mNGS for the NID group were comparable. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of diagnosing an ID by ptNGS were 77.3% and 56.3%, respectively. While, the PPV and NPV of diagnosing an ID by mNGS were 76.9% and 44.0%, respectively. ptNGS increased the sensitivity rate by approximately 70%. The sensitivity rate of ptNGS was higher than that of mNGS (70.8% vs. 41.7%), while the specificity rate of mNGS was higher than that of ptNGS (78.6% vs. 64.3%). Additionally, ptNGS required a shorter time for pathogen diagnosis (15 vs. 24 hrs) and had lower costs than mNGS.ConclusionsptNGS has a number of advantages over mNGS, including its sensitivity, timeliness, and economy, all factors that are important considerations in clinical use.