Dataset Information

Therapeutic Potential of Vortioxetine for Anxious Depression: A Post Hoc Analysis of Data from a Clinical Trial Conducted in Japan

ABSTRACT:

Aim

Antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, often elicit a poor response in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) with significant anxiety symptoms. This study investigated the effects of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine in patients with MDD and associated anxiety.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of data from an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study of vortioxetine (10 mg or 20 mg) in Japanese patients aged 20–75 years with recurrent MDD and a Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of at least 26. Changes from baseline to week 8 in MADRS total score and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) anxiety/somatization factor score were assessed in patients with anxious depression (HAM-D anxiety/somatization factor score ≥7) and without anxious depression.

Results

Data were available for 489 patients. In patients with anxious depression, the least-squares (LS) mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) versus placebo in change in MADRS total score was −3.44 (−6.10, −0.77) for vortioxetine 10 mg and −4.51 (−7.15, −1.87) for vortioxetine 20 mg. In patients with non-anxious depression, the LS mean difference (95% CI) versus placebo was −1.81 (−4.71, 1.09) and −1.05 (−4.00, 1.90) for vortioxetine 10 mg and 20 mg, respectively. Changes from baseline in HAM-D anxiety/somatization factor score were greater in patients treated with vortioxetine 10 mg or 20 mg than in those treated with placebo.

Conclusion

Vortioxetine may be effective for patients with anxiety symptoms in MDD. Further research is warranted to investigate these effects in a real-world clinical setting.

Clinical Trials Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier for primary study: NCT02389816.

SUBMITTER: Inoue T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8710584 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionVortioxetine is an antidepressant primarily metabolized by the polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model of vortioxetine and its CYP2D6-dependent metabolite was recently published.ObjectiveThe aim of the current study was to assess the predictive performance of the popPK model using vortioxetine concentration measurements from a clinical setting. Furthermore, the study aimed to evaluate the ability of different CYP2D6 phenotype classification systems to provide accurate concentration predictions.MethodsOverall, 1388 patients receiving vortioxetine treatment were identified from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database in Oslo, Norway; 334 CYP2D6-genotyped patients with 502 serum concentrations of vortioxetine, analysed by a validated ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) method, were retrospectively included. The performance of the vortioxetine popPK model was tested on the clinical data from the TDM database.ResultsOverall, the model had a good ability to predict vortioxetine concentrations measured in clinical practice, with a slight tendency to overpredict concentrations. Using simulation-based diagnostics, 76% of the prediction-corrected TDM concentrations were within the 90% prediction interval based on 1000 simulated data sets. Prediction-based diagnostics showed the best performance for CYP2D6 poor and ultrarapid metabolizers, with a median prediction error (MDPE) of 12% and 23%, respectively, while the poorest performance was observed for normal metabolizers, with an MDPE of 66%. In the comparison of different CYP2D6 phenotype classification systems, the use of differentiated activity scores for decreased function alleles did not improve the concentration predictions. Grouping the CYP2D6 genotypes into the four conventional phenotype groups provided predictions closest to the TDM measured concentrations.ConclusionTDM data provide a unique insight into real-world clinical practice with vortioxetine. The tendency of the popPK model to overpredict vortioxetine concentrations measured in TDM may be attributed to several factors, including poor treatment compliance for some patients and, to a lesser extent, lack of information on patient characteristics and misspecified CYP2D6 alleles. To optimize personalized therapy with vortioxetine, real-world clinical data sets originating from different ethnicities need to be studied in the future.

Project description:BackgroundThe effectiveness of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in treating severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) is established; however, the necessity of purified CD34+ cell grafts and the appropriate conditioning regimen remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CD34-selected auto-HSCT with unmanipulated auto-HSCT to treat severe SSc.MethodsThis study was a post hoc analysis of a phase I/II clinical trial conducted in Japan. Nineteen patients with severe SSc were enrolled. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were mobilised with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and filgrastim (10 μg/kg/day). Following PBSC collection by apheresis, CD34+ cells were immunologically selected in 11 patients. All patients were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg) monotherapy as a conditioning regimen and received CD34-selected (n = 11) or unmanipulated auto-HSCT (n = 8). Changes in skin sclerosis and pulmonary function were assessed over an 8-year follow-up period. Differences in the changes, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were compared between patients who had received CD34-selected auto-HSCT and those who had received unmanipulated auto-HSCT.ResultsSkin sclerosis progressively improved after transplantation over an 8-year follow-up period in both groups, and the improvement was significantly greater in the CD34-selected group than in the unmanipulated group. Forced vital capacity in the CD34-selected group continuously increased over 8 years, whereas in the unmanipulated group it returned to baseline 3 years after transplantation. Toxicity and viral infections, such as cytomegalovirus infection and herpes zoster, were more frequently found in the CD34-selected group than in the unmanipulated group. The frequency of severe adverse events, such as bacterial infections or organ toxicity, was similar between the two groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either treatment group. PFS of the CD34-selected group was greater than that of the unmanipulated group, and the 5-year PFS rates of the CD34-selected and unmanipulated group were 81.8% and 50% respectively.ConclusionsCD34-selected auto-HSCT may produce favourable effects on improvement of skin sclerosis and pulmonary function compared with unmanipulated auto-HSCT. Use of CD34-selected auto-HSCT with high-dose cyclophosphamide monotherapy as a conditioning regimen may offer an excellent benefit-to-risk balance.