Dataset Information

SATB1, genomic instability and Gleason grading constitute a novel risk score for prostate cancer.

ABSTRACT: Current prostate cancer risk classifications rely on clinicopathological parameters resulting in uncertainties for prognostication. To improve individual risk stratification, we examined the predictive value of selected proteins with respect to tumor heterogeneity and genomic instability. We assessed the degree of genomic instability in 50 radical prostatectomy specimens by DNA-Image-Cytometry and evaluated protein expression in related 199 tissue-microarray (TMA) cores. Immunohistochemical data of SATB1, SPIN1, TPM4, VIME and TBB5 were correlated with the degree of genomic instability, established clinical risk factors and overall survival. Genomic instability was associated with a GS ≥ 7 (p = 0.001) and worse overall survival (p = 0.008). A positive SATB1 expression was associated with a GS ≤ 6 (p = 0.040), genomic stability (p = 0.027), and was a predictor for increased overall survival (p = 0.023). High expression of SPIN1 was also associated with longer overall survival (p = 0.048) and lower preoperative PSA-values (p = 0.047). The combination of SATB1 expression, genomic instability, and GS lead to a novel Prostate Cancer Prediction Score (PCP-Score) which outperforms the current D'Amico et al. stratification for predicting overall survival. Low SATB1 expression, genomic instability and GS ≥ 7 were identified as markers for poor prognosis. Their combination overcomes current clinical risk stratification regimes.

SUBMITTER: Dumke C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8712510 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Despite revisions in 2005 and 2014, the Gleason prostate cancer (PCa) grading system still has major deficiencies. Combining of Gleason scores into a three-tiered grouping (6, 7, 8-10) is used most frequently for prognostic and therapeutic purposes. The lowest score, assigned 6, may be misunderstood as a cancer in the middle of the grading scale, and 3+4=7 and 4+3=7 are often considered the same prognostic group.To verify that a new grading system accurately produces a smaller number of grades with the most significant prognostic differences, using multi-institutional and multimodal therapy data.Between 2005 and 2014, 20,845 consecutive men were treated by radical prostatectomy at five academic institutions; 5501 men were treated with radiotherapy at two academic institutions.Outcome was based on biochemical recurrence (BCR). The log-rank test assessed univariable differences in BCR by Gleason score. Separate univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards used four possible categorizations of Gleason scores.In the surgery cohort, we found large differences in recurrence rates between both Gleason 3+4 versus 4+3 and Gleason 8 versus 9. The hazard ratios relative to Gleason score 6 were 1.9, 5.1, 8.0, and 11.7 for Gleason scores 3+4, 4+3, 8, and 9-10, respectively. These differences were attenuated in the radiotherapy cohort as a whole due to increased adjuvant or neoadjuvant hormones for patients with high-grade disease but were clearly seen in patients undergoing radiotherapy only. A five-grade group system had the highest prognostic discrimination for all cohorts on both univariable and multivariable analysis. The major limitation was the unavoidable use of prostate-specific antigen BCR as an end point as opposed to cancer-related death.The new PCa grading system has these benefits: more accurate grade stratification than current systems, simplified grading system of five grades, and lowest grade is 1, as opposed to 6, with the potential to reduce overtreatment of PCa.We looked at outcomes for prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy and validated a new grading system with more accurate grade stratification than current systems, including a simplified grading system of five grades and a lowest grade is 1, as opposed to 6, with the potential to reduce overtreatment of PCa.

Project description:BackgroundProstate tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence, metastases, and tumor proliferation. A recent study showed that prostate tumor eccentricity (elongation or roundness) correlated with Gleason score. No studies examined the relationship among the prostate tumor's shape, volume, and potential aggressiveness.MethodsOf the 26 patients that were analyzed, 18 had volumes >1 cc for the histology-based study, and 25 took up contrast material for the MRI portion of this study. This retrospective study quantitatively compared tumor eccentricity and volume measurements from pathology assessment sectioned wholemount prostates and multi-parametric MRI to Gleason scores. Multi-parametric MRI (T1, T2, diffusion, dynamic contrast-enhanced images) were resized, translated, and stitched to form spatially registered multi-parametric cubes. Multi-parametric signatures that characterize prostate tumors were inserted into a target detection algorithm (Adaptive Cosine Estimator, ACE). Various detection thresholds were applied to discriminate tumor from normal tissue. Pixel-based blobbing, and labeling were applied to digitized pathology slides and threshold ACE images. Tumor volumes were measured by counting voxels within the blob. Eccentricity calculation used moments of inertia from the blobs.ResultsFrom wholemount prostatectomy slides, fitting two sets of independent variables, prostate tumor eccentricity (largest blob eccentricity, weighted eccentricity, filtered weighted eccentricity) and tumor volume (largest blob volume, average blob volume, filtered average blob volume) to Gleason score in a multivariate analysis, yields correlation coefficient R=0.798 to 0.879 with P<0.01. The eccentricity t-statistic exceeded the volume t-statistic. Fitting histology-based total prostate tumor volume against Gleason score yields R=0.498, P=0.0098. From multi-parametric MRI, the correlation coefficient R between the Gleason score and the largest blob eccentricity for varying thresholds (0.30 to 0.55) ranged from -0.51 to -0.672 (P<0.01). For varying thresholds (0.60 to 0.80) for MRI detection, the R between the largest blob volume eccentricity against the Gleason score ranged from 0.46 to 0.50 (P<0.03). Combining tumor eccentricity and tumor volume in multivariate analysis failed to increase Gleason score prediction.ConclusionsProstate tumor eccentricity, determined by histology or MRI, more accurately predicted Gleason score than prostate tumor volume. Combining tumor eccentricity with volume from histology-based analysis enhanced Gleason score prediction, unlike MRI.

Project description:Background and objectiveGleason grading system is currently the clinical gold standard for determining prostate cancer aggressiveness. Prostate cancer is typically classified into one of 5 different categories with 1 representing the most indolent disease and 5 reflecting the most aggressive disease. Grades 3 and 4 are the most common and difficult patterns to be discriminated in clinical practice. Even though the degree of gland differentiation is the strongest determinant of Gleason grade, manual grading is subjective and is hampered by substantial inter-reader disagreement, especially with regard to intermediate grade groups.MethodsTo capture the topological characteristics and the degree of connectivity between nuclei around the gland, the concept of Homology Profile (HP) for prostate cancer grading is presented in this paper. HP is an algebraic tool, whereby, certain algebraic invariants are computed based on the structure of a topological space. We utilized the Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) features to quantify the extent of glandular differentiation. The quantitative characteristics which represent the image patch are fed into a supervised classifier model for discrimination of grade patterns 3 and 4.ResultsOn the basis of the novel homology profile, we evaluated 43 digitized images of prostate biopsy slides annotated for regions corresponding to Grades 3 and 4. The quantitative patch-level evaluation results showed that our approach achieved an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 0.96 and an accuracy of 0.89 in terms of discriminating Grade 3 and 4 patches. Our approach was found to be superior to comparative methods including handcrafted cellular features, Stacked Sparse Autoencoder (SSAE) algorithm and end-to-end supervised learning method (DLGg). Also, slide-level quantitative and qualitative evaluation results reflect the ability of our approach in discriminating Gleason Grade 3 from 4 patterns on H&E tissue images.ConclusionsWe presented a novel Statistical Representation of Homology Profile (SRHP) approach for automated Gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides. The most discriminating topological descriptions of cancerous regions for grade 3 and 4 in prostate cancer were identified. Moreover, these characteristics of homology profile are interpretable, visually meaningful and highly consistent with the rubric employed by pathologists for the task of Gleason grading.

Dataset Information

SATB1, genomic instability and Gleason grading constitute a novel risk score for prostate cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets