Dataset Information

Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the surgicopathological outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLD) and long-term oncological outcomes of selective LPLD after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and compare them to those of total mesorectal excision (TME) alone based on pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

We compared the TME-alone group (2001-2009, n=102) with the TME with LPLD group (2011-2016, n=69), both groups having lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) of ≥5 mm in short axis diameter. The surgicopathological outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Oncological outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The rates of overall postoperative 30-day morbidity (42.0% vs. 26.5%, P=0.095) and urinary retention (13.7% vs. 10.1%, P=0.484) were not significantly different between the LPLD and TME-alone groups, respectively. Pathologically proven LLN metastasis was identified in 24 (34.8%) LPLD cases after nCRT. The LPLD group showed a lower 5-year local recurrence (LR) rate (27.9% vs. 4.6%, P<0.001) and better recurrence-free survival (RFS) (59.6% vs. 78.2%, P=0.008) than those of the TME-alone group, while the 5-year overall survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (76.2% vs. 86.5%, P=0.094).

Conclusion

This study suggests that LPLD is a safe and feasible procedure. The oncological outcomes suggest that selective LPLD improves LR and RFS in patients with clinically suspicious LLNs on pretreatment MRI. Considering that lateral nodal disease is not common, a multicenter large-scale study is necessary.

SUBMITTER: Kim MC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8717070 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) metastasis causes increased lateral local recurrence and poor prognosis. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance and effective range of dissection for the LPN dissection (LPND) in rectal cancer patients with LPN metastasis.Materials and methodsThrough this large, multicenter retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the therapeutic effect of LPND. From January 2012 to December 2019, 387 rectal cancer patients with clinical evidence of LPN metastasis who underwent total mesorectal excision with LPND were included in the study. According to pathological findings, they were divided into negative (n = 296) and positive (n = 91) LPN groups. Primary endpoints were 3-year overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS).ResultsThe OS, RFS, and LRFS in the positive group were significantly worse than those in the negative group; However, LPN metastases were not independent prognostic risk factors for LRFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-7.64; P=0.132). Among patients with pathological LPN metastases, LPN metastases to the common and external iliac arteries were independent prognostic risk factors both for OS (HR: 4.74; 95% CI, 1.74-12.90; P=0.002) and RFS (HR: 2.70; 95% CI, 1.16-6.29; P=0.021). No significant difference was observed in the 3-year OS (72.3% vs. 70.2%, P=0.775) and RFS rates (60.9% vs. 52.6%, P=0.408) between patients with metastases to the obturator or internal iliac arteries and patients at N2b stage.ConclusionsLPND may be effective in controlling local recurrence in patients with LPN metastasis but not systemic metastases. Patients with LPN metastasis limited to the internal iliac and obturator regions achieve a long-term survival benefit from LPND, and their prognoses may be comparable to those at the N2b stage. Further metastasis to the external iliac or common iliac region should be considered systemic disease, and LPND should be avoided.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04850027.

Project description:Background and objectiveThe role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer is still controversial. This study aims to compare the outcomes of PLND between extraperitoneal single-port (SP eRARP) and transperitoneal multiport (MP tRARP) robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis from our single-center database for patients who underwent SP eRARP or MP tRARP with PLND between 2015 and 2023. The primary endpoint was to analyze and compare specific data related to PLND between the two populations by the detection of pN+ patients, the total number of lymph nodes removed, and the number of positive lymph nodes removed. The secondary endpoints included comparing major complications, lymphoceles, and biochemical recurrence between the two cohorts of the study.Key findings and limitationsA total of 293 patients were included, with 85 (29%) undergoing SP eRARP and 208 (71%) undergoing MP tRARP. SP eRARP showed significant differences in PLND extension from MP tRARP, while MP tRARP yielded more lymph nodes (p < 0.001). There were no differences in pN+ patient detection (p = 0.7) or the number of positive lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.6). The rates of major complications (p = 0.6), lymphoceles (p = 0.2), and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.9) were similar between the two groups. Additionally, SP eRARP had shorter operative time (p = 0.045), hospital stay (p < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at discharge (p = 0.03). Limitations include a retrospective, single-center analysis.Conclusions and clinical implicationsDespite the SP approach in RARP resulting in fewer retrieved lymph nodes, outcomes were comparable with the MP approach regarding the detection of patients with positive lymph nodes and the number of positive nodes. Additionally, the SP approach led to lower pain levels and shorter hospital stays.Patient summaryWith this study, we demonstrate that pelvic lymph node dissection performed via the extraperitoneal approach during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with a single-port system provides comparable outcomes with the standard transperitoneal multiport approach in detecting patients with positive lymph nodes and retrieving positive nodes. In addition, it offers significantly reduced pain levels and shorter hospital stays.