Dataset Information

Association of Physician Characteristics With Early Adoption of Virtual Health Care.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

The rapid transition to virtual health care has depended on physician and patient abilities to adopt new technology and workflows. Physicians transitioning more slowly or not at all could result in access challenges for their patients.

Objective

To identify physician characteristics associated with the transition to virtual health care in a large regional health care system.

Design, setting, and participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study uses administrative health system databases to analyze data from all 3473 physicians providing ambulatory care through a large New England health care system, which includes 12 hospitals and their ambulatory practices, from October 1, 2019, through December 31, 2020.

Exposures

Physicians characterized based on gender, popularized generational demographic cohort (Silent Generation, born 1928-1945; Baby Boomers, born 1946-1964; Generation X, born 1965-1980; and Millennials, born 1981-1996), specialty (behavioral health, primary care, medical, and surgical), and hospital affiliation as well as selected patient characteristics (number of visits and proportion of patients with self-pay or Medicaid insurance, aged 65 years or older, preference for speaking a language other than English, from a racial or ethnic minority group, and with an active patient portal).

Main outcomes and measures

Early adoption of virtual health care. Bivariate comparisons were made, and regression modeling was used to examine characteristics associated with the likelihood of early adoption of virtual health care.

Results

Of 3473 physicians conducting ambulatory visits during the study period, 1624 (46.8%) were women, 83 (2.4%) were in the Silent Generation, 994 (28.6%) were Baby Boomers, 1637 (47.1%) were in Generation X, and 759 (21.9%) were Millennials. There were 1649 physicians (47.5%) in medical specialties, 749 physicians (21.6%) in surgical specialties, and 248 physicians (7.1%) in behavioral health. After accounting for other characteristics, female (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44), behavioral health (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.11-4.04), and primary care (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.36-2.09) physicians had greater odds of being early adopters, and physicians in the Silent Generation (OR, 0.39, 95% CI, 0.24-0.65) and in surgical specialties (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.38-0.57) were less likely to be early adopters. Patient characteristics were less strongly associated with physician adoption.

Conclusions and relevance

In this cross-sectional study, there was physician-level variation in the adoption of virtual health care, with female, primary care, and behavioral health physicians in this system most likely to lead the transformation to virtual health care.

SUBMITTER: Zachrison KS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8719243 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Importance:Understanding adoption of new cancer therapies may help identify opportunities to increase use for high-value indications. Objective:To determine whether use of bevacizumab in 2005 to 2006 by oncologists' peers was associated with greater bevacizumab use among oncologists in 2007 to 2010. Design, Setting, and Participants:This cohort study of physicians and their patients took place in 51 randomly selected hospital referral regions in the United States. Participants were 44 012 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with cancers of the colorectum, lung, breast, kidney, brain, or ovary treated by 3261 oncologists in 2005 to 2010 and assigned to one of 252 communities. Data were analyzed in 2017 to 2018. Exposures:Among patients treated with chemotherapy during 2007 to 2010 by an oncologist who had not treated patients with bevacizumab in 2005 to 2006, models assessed the association of bevacizumab use with rates of bevacizumab use in their physician's community of connected physicians in 2005 to 2006. Models adjusted for patient and physician characteristics and physician, practice, and community random effects. Main Outcomes and Measures:Receipt of bevacizumab. Results:A total of 34 750 patients (14 126 [40.6%] aged ≥75 years; 21 321 [61.4%] female) with cancers of the colorectum, lung, breast, kidney, brain, and ovary were treated with chemotherapy in 2005 to 2006 in the 51 hospital referral regions. Among 9262 patients treated in 2007 to 2010 by 829 physicians whose patients did not use bevacizumab in 2005 to 2006, 3654 (39.5%) were aged 75 years or older and 6227 (67.2%) were female. The rate of bevacizumab use relative to other chemotherapy in 2007 to 2010 by tertile of use (bevacizumab for <4.4%, 4.4%-6.2%, and >6.2% of all patients receiving chemotherapy) among their physician's peers in 2005 to 2006 was 10.0%, 9.5%, and 13.6%, respectively. After adjustment, use of bevacizumab in 2007 to 2010 was greater among physicians in communities with the highest rates of bevacizumab use in 2005 to 2006 compared with those whose peers were in the lowest tertile of bevacizumab use in 2005 to 2006 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.20-2.25). Conclusions and Relevance:This study found that an increase in oncologists' adoption and use of bevacizumab in the years after its approval was associated with their peer physicians being earlier adopters. As organizations seek to provide better care at lower costs, interventions that leverage physician ties may help to promote adoption of high-value use of new cancer treatments and deimplementation of low-value therapies.

Project description:BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic is favoring digital transitions in many industries and in society as a whole. Health care organizations have responded to the first phase of the pandemic by rapidly adopting digital solutions and advanced technology tools.ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to describe the digital solutions that have been reported in the early scientific literature to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on individuals and health systems.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of early COVID-19-related literature (from January 1 to April 30, 2020) by searching MEDLINE and medRxiv with appropriate terms to find relevant literature on the use of digital technologies in response to the pandemic. We extracted study characteristics such as the paper title, journal, and publication date, and we categorized the retrieved papers by the type of technology and patient needs addressed. We built a scoring rubric by cross-classifying the patient needs with the type of technology. We also extracted information and classified each technology reported by the selected articles according to health care system target, grade of innovation, and scalability to other geographical areas.ResultsThe search identified 269 articles, of which 124 full-text articles were assessed and included in the review after screening. Most of the selected articles addressed the use of digital technologies for diagnosis, surveillance, and prevention. We report that most of these digital solutions and innovative technologies have been proposed for the diagnosis of COVID-19. In particular, within the reviewed articles, we identified numerous suggestions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tools for the diagnosis and screening of COVID-19. Digital technologies are also useful for prevention and surveillance measures, such as contact-tracing apps and monitoring of internet searches and social media usage. Fewer scientific contributions address the use of digital technologies for lifestyle empowerment or patient engagement.ConclusionsIn the field of diagnosis, digital solutions that integrate with traditional methods, such as AI-based diagnostic algorithms based both on imaging and clinical data, appear to be promising. For surveillance, digital apps have already proven their effectiveness; however, problems related to privacy and usability remain. For other patient needs, several solutions have been proposed, such as telemedicine or telehealth tools. These tools have long been available, but this historical moment may actually be favoring their definitive large-scale adoption. It is worth taking advantage of the impetus provided by the crisis; it is also important to keep track of the digital solutions currently being proposed to implement best practices and models of care in future and to adopt at least some of the solutions proposed in the scientific literature, especially in national health systems, which have proved to be particularly resistant to the digital transition in recent years.

Project description:ObjectiveTo profile the characteristics of growing numbers of sepsis survivors receiving home healthcare (HHC) by type of sepsis before, during, and after a sepsis hospitalization and identify characteristics significantly associated with 7-day readmission.DesignCross-sectional descriptive study. Data sources included the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) and Medicare administrative and claims data.Setting and participantsNational sample of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for sepsis who were discharged to HHC between July 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014 (N = 165,228).MethodsWe used an indicator distinguishing among 3 types of sepsis: explicitly coded sepsis diagnosis without organ dysfunction; severe sepsis with organ dysfunction; and septic shock. We compared these subgroups' demographic, clinical and functional characteristics, comorbidities, risk factors for rehospitalization, characteristics of the index hospital stay, and predicted 7-day hospital readmission.ResultsThe majority (80.7%) had severe sepsis, 5.7% had septic shock, and 13.6% had sepsis without acute organ system dysfunction. The medical diagnoses recorded at HHC admission identified sepsis or blood infection only 7% of the time, potentially creating difficulty identifying the sepsis survivor in HHC. Among sepsis types, septic shock survivors had the greatest illness burden profile. This study describes 12 key variables, each of which individually raises the relative 7-day readmission risk by as much as 60%. Increased risk of 7-day rehospitalization was found among those with septic shock, 3 or more previous inpatient stays, index hospital length of stay of >8 days, dyspnea, >6 functional dependencies, and other risk factors.Conclusions and implicationsImplications for practice include using our findings to identify sepsis survivors who are at risk for early readmission. Assessment for these factors may profile the at-risk patient, thereby triggering the call for additional acute care intervention such as delayed discharge, or post-acute intervention such as early home visit and outpatient follow-up.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Virtual communities of practice (VCoPs) have been shown to be an effective means for knowledge and research uptake, but little is known about why health care workers choose to use them. The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) is a theoretical model of persuasion that distinguishes between different routes of information processing that influence attitude formation and change. To date, no research has investigated the antecedents to these processing routes for VCoPs within a health care setting. In understanding these determinants, VCoPs can be appropriately designed to increase their chances of use and value among health care professionals. OBJECTIVE:Our aim is to explore how motivation and ability affect attitudes toward using VCoPs for those working in health care. METHODS:Data were collected from 86 health care workers using an online survey at two Canadian health care conferences. Participants were shown a mock VCoP and asked about their perceptions of the online platform and related technologies. The survey instrument was developed based on previously validated scales to measure participants' ability and motivation toward using a VCoP. Attitudes were assessed both at the beginning and end of the study; intention to use the platform was assessed at the end. RESULTS:Ability (expertise with CoPs and VCoPs) was found to directly affect intention to use the system (P<.001 and P=.009, respectively) as was motivation (P<.001). Argument quality had the greatest effect on formed attitudes toward VCoPs, regardless of the user's level of experience (lower expertise: P=.04; higher expertise: P=.003). Those with higher levels of CoPs expertise were also influenced by peripheral cues of source credibility (P=.005 for attitude formation and intention to use the system) and connectedness (P=.04 for attitude formation; P=.008 for intention to use the system), whereas those with lower levels of CoP expertise were not (P>.05). A significant correlation between formed attitude and intention to use the VCoPs system was found for those with higher levels of expertise (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS:This research found that both user ability and motivation play an important and positive role in the attitude toward and adoption of health care VCoPs. Unlike previous ELM research, evidence-based arguments were found to be an effective messaging tactic for improving attitudes toward VCoPs for health care professionals with both high and low levels of expertise. Understanding these factors that influence the attitudes of VCoPs can provide insight into how to best design and position such systems to encourage their effective use among health care professionals.