Thromboembolic complications during and after hospitalization for COVID-19: Incidence, risk factors and thromboprophylaxis
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
The incidence of thromboembolism during COVID-19 and the use of thromboprophylaxis vary greatly between studies. Only a few studies have investigated the rate of thromboembolism post-discharge. This study determined the 90-day incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic complications, risk factors for venous thromboembolic events and characterized the use of thromboprophylaxis during and after hospitalization. Materials and methods
We retrospectively reviewed medical records for adult patients hospitalized for >24 h for COVID-19 before May 15, 2020, in ten Norwegian hospitals. We extracted data on demographics, thromboembolic complications, thromboembolic risk factors, and the use of thromboprophylaxis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine risk factors for VTE. Results
550 patients were included. The 90-day incidence of arterial and venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients was 6.9% (95% CI: 5.1–9.3) overall and 13.8% in the ICU. Male sex (hazard ratio (HR) 7.44, 95% CI 1.73–32.02, p = 0.007) and previous VTE (HR 6.11, 95% CI: 1.74–21.39, p = 0.005) were associated with risk of VTE in multivariable analysis. Thromboprophylaxis was started in 334 patients (61%) with a median duration of 7 days (25th–75th percentile 3–13); in the VTE population 10/23 (43%) started thromboprophylaxis prior to diagnosis. After discharge 20/223 patients received extended thromboprophylaxis and 2/223 (0.7%, 95% CI: 0.3–1.9) had a thromboembolism. Conclusions
The 90-day incidence of thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients was 7%, but <1% after discharge. Risk factors were male sex and previous VTE. Most patients received thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization, but only <10% after discharge.
SUBMITTER: Tholin B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8720677 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundPatients hospitalized with COVID-19 have an increased incidence of thromboembolism. The role of extended thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine whether anticoagulation is superior to placebo in reducing death and thromboembolic complications among patients discharged after COVID-19 hospitalization.DesignProspective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04650087).SettingDone during 2021 to 2022 among 127 U.S. hospitals.ParticipantsAdults aged 18 years or older hospitalized with COVID-19 for 48 hours or more and ready for discharge, excluding those with a requirement for, or contraindication to, anticoagulation.Intervention2.5 mg of apixaban versus placebo twice daily for 30 days.MeasurementsThe primary efficacy end point was a 30-day composite of death, arterial thromboembolism, and venous thromboembolism. The primary safety end points were 30-day major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding.ResultsEnrollment was terminated early, after 1217 participants were randomly assigned, because of a lower than anticipated event rate and a declining rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations. Median age was 54 years, 50.4% were women, 26.5% were Black, and 16.7% were Hispanic; 30.7% had a World Health Organization severity score of 5 or greater, and 11.0% had an International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism risk prediction score of greater than 4. Incidence of the primary end point was 2.13% (95% CI, 1.14 to 3.62) in the apixaban group and 2.31% (CI, 1.27 to 3.84) in the placebo group. Major bleeding occurred in 2 (0.4%) and 1 (0.2%) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 3 (0.6%) and 6 (1.1%) apixaban-treated and placebo-treated participants, respectively. By day 30, thirty-six (3.0%) participants were lost to follow-up, and 8.5% of apixaban and 11.9% of placebo participants permanently discontinued the study drug treatment.LimitationsThe introduction of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines decreased the risk for hospitalization and death. Study enrollment spanned the peaks of the Delta and Omicron variants in the United States, which influenced illness severity.ConclusionThe incidence of death or thromboembolism was low in this cohort of patients discharged after hospitalization with COVID-19. Because of early enrollment termination, the results were imprecise and the study was inconclusive.Primary funding sourceNational Institutes of Health.
| S-EPMC10064277 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and pulmonary embolism, represent an important source of adverse outcomes in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).ObjectivesTo assess the frequency of arterial and venous thromboembolic disease, risk factors, prevention and management patterns, and outcomes in patients with COVID-19, the authors designed a multicenter, observational cohort study.MethodsWe analyzed a retrospective cohort of 1,114 patients with COVID-19 diagnosed through our Mass General Brigham integrated health network. The total cohort was analyzed by site of care: intensive care (n = 170); hospitalized nonintensive care (n = 229); and outpatient (n = 715). The primary study outcome was a composite of adjudicated major arterial or venous thromboembolism.ResultsPatients with COVID-19 were 22.3% Hispanic/Latinx and 44.2% non-White. Cardiovascular risk factors of hypertension (35.8%), hyperlipidemia (28.6%), and diabetes (18.0%) were common. Prophylactic anticoagulation was prescribed in 89.4% of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care cohort and 84.7% of those in the hospitalized nonintensive care setting. Frequencies of major arterial or venous thromboembolism, major cardiovascular adverse events, and symptomatic venous thromboembolism were highest in the intensive care cohort (35.3%, 45.9%, and 27.0 %, respectively) followed by the hospitalized nonintensive care cohort (2.6%, 6.1%, and 2.2%, respectively) and the outpatient cohort (0% for all).ConclusionsMajor arterial or venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, and symptomatic venous thromboembolism occurred with high frequency in patients with COVID-19, especially in the intensive care setting, despite a high utilization rate of thromboprophylaxis.
| S-EPMC7588178 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCharacterizations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine breakthrough infections are limited. We aim to characterize breakthrough infections and identify risk factors associated with outcomes.MethodsThis was a retrospective case series of consecutive fully vaccinated patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a multicenter academic center in Southeast Michigan, between December 30, 2020, and September 15, 2021.ResultsA total of 982 patients were identified; the mean age was 57.9 years, 565 (59%) were female, 774 (79%) were White, and 255 (26%) were health care workers (HCWs). The median number of comorbidities was 2; 225 (23%) were immunocompromised. BNT162b2 was administered to 737 (75%) individuals. The mean time to SARS-CoV-2 detection was 135 days. The majority were asymptomatic or exhibited mild to moderate disease, 154 (16%) required hospitalization, 127 (13%) had severe-critical illness, and 19 (2%) died. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.07; P < .001), cardiovascular disease (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.55-5.89; P = .001), and immunocompromised status (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.70-3.90; P < .001) were independent risk factors for hospitalization. Additionally, age (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P = .006) was significantly associated with mortality. HCWs (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.50; P = .002) were less likely to be hospitalized, and prior receipt of BNT162b2 was associated with lower odds of hospitalization (OR, 0.436; 95% CI, 0.303-0.626; P < .001) and/or death (OR, 0.360; 95% CI, 0.145-0.898; P = .029).ConclusionsCOVID-19 vaccines remain effective at attenuating disease severity. However, patients with breakthrough infections necessitating hospitalization may benefit from early treatment modalities and COVID-19-mitigating strategies, especially in areas with substantial or high transmission rates.
| S-EPMC8903475 | biostudies-literature
Project description:People with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, COVID-19, can have neurological problems including headache, anosmia, dysgeusia, altered mental status (AMS), ischemic stroke with or without large vessel occlusion, and Guillen-Barre Syndrome. Louisiana was one of the states hit hardest by the pandemic with just over 57,000 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 by the end of June 2020. We reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) of patients hospitalized during the peak of the pandemic, March 1st through March 31st, to document the type and frequency of neurological problems seen in patients with COVID-19 at presentation to the emergency room. Secondary aims were to determine: 1) the frequency of neurological complaints during the hospital stay; 2) whether the presence of any neurological complaint at presentation or any of the individual types of neurological complaints at admission predicted three separate outcomes: death, length of hospital stay, or the need for intubation; and 3) if the presence of any neurological complaint or any of the individual types of neurological complaints developed during hospital stay predicted the previous three outcomes. A large proportion of our sample (80 %) was African American and had hypertension (79 %). Out of 250 patients, 56 (22 %) patients died, and 72 (29 %) patients required intubation. Thirty-four (14 %) had a neurological chief complaint at presentation; the most common neurological chief complaints in the entire sample were altered mental status (AMS) (8 %), headache (2 %), and syncope (2 %). We used a competing risk model to determine whether neurological symptoms at presentation or during hospital stay were predictors of prolonged hospital stay and death. To establish whether neurological symptoms were associated with higher odds of intubation, we used logistic regression. Age was the only significant demographic predictor of death and hospital stay. The HR (95 %CI) for remaining in the hospital for a ten-year increase in age was 1.2, (1.1, 1.3, p < 0.0001), and for death was 1.3, (1.1, 1.5, p < 0.01). There were no demographic characteristics, including age or comorbidities predictive of intubation. Adjusting for age, patients who at presentation had neurological issues as their chief complaint were at significantly increased risk for remaining in the hospital, HR = 1.7, (1.1,2.5, p = 0.0001), and dying, HR = 2.1(1.1,3.8, p = 0.02), compared to patients without any neurological complaint. Of the individual admission complaints, AMS was associated with a significantly prolonged hospital stay, HR = 1.8, (1.0-3.3, p = 0.05). Patients that required dialysis or intubation or had AMS during hospitalization had more extended hospital stays. After adjusting for age, dialysis, and intubation, patients with AMS during hospital stay had a HR of 1.6, (1.1, 2.5, p = 0.01) for remaining in the hospital. Patients who had statistically significant higher odds of requiring intubation were those who presented with any neurological chief complaint, OR = 2.8 (1.3,5.8, p = 0.01), or with headaches OR = 13.3 (2.1,257.0, p = 0.008). Patients with AMS during the hospital stay, as well as those who had seizures, were more likely to need intubation. In the multivariate model, dialysis, OR = 4.9 (2.6,9.4, p < 0.0001), and AMS, OR = 8.8 (3.9,21.2, p < 0.0001), were the only independent predictors of intubation. Neurological complaints at presentation and during the hospital stay are associated with a higher risk of death, prolonged hospital stay, and intubation. More work is needed to determine whether the cause of the neurological complaints was direct CNS involvement by the virus or the other systemic complications of the virus.
| S-EPMC7445124 | biostudies-literature
Project description:RationaleThe association between smoking status and severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains controversial.ObjectiveTo assess the risk of hospitalization (as a marker of severe COVID-19) in patients by smoking status: former, current and never smokers, who tested positive for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV2) at an academic medical center in the United States.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients with SARS-COV2 between March-1-2020 and January-31-2021 to identify the risk of hospitalization due to COVID-19 by smoking status.ResultsWe identified 10216 SARS-COV2-positive patients with complete documentation of smoking habits. Within 14 days of a SARS-COV2 positive test, 1150 (11.2%) patients were admitted and 188 (1.8%) died. Significantly more former smokers were hospitalized from COVID-19 than current or never smokers (21.2% former smokers; 7.3% current smokers; 10.4% never smokers, p<0.0001). In univariable analysis, former smokers had higher odds of hospitalization from COVID-19 than never smokers (OR 2.31; 95% CI 1.94-2.74). This association remained significant when analysis was adjusted for age, race and gender (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.06-1.55), but became non-significant when analysis included Body Mass Index, previous hospitalization and number of comorbidities (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86-1.29). In contrast, current smokers were less likely than never smokers to be hospitalized due to COVID-19.ConclusionsSignificantly more former smokers were hospitalized and died from COVID-19 than current or never smokers. This effect is mediated via age and comorbidities in former smokers.
| S-EPMC8052507 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA high incidence of thromboembolic complications is one of the hallmarks of COVID-19. However, there may be a difference in the incidence of thromboembolic complications between Asian and Western people. In addition, few prospective studies have been conducted to determine the incidence of thromboembolic complications in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in medical wards in Japan.MethodsA single-center retrospective and prospective cohort study was conducted to determine the incidence of thromboembolic complications in symptomatic COVID-19 patients in a medical ward in a Japanese hospital. All 1116 consecutive COVID-19 patients who were admitted to our hospital from November 1, 2020, to October 26, 2021, were included. The primary outcome was any thromboembolic complications, which included venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and other arterial embolisms.ResultsThe median patient age was 50 (IQR, 37-61), 402 (36.0%) were women, 1005 (90.1%) were Japanese, the median body mass index was 24.1 (IQR, 21.6-27.2), and 43 (3.9%) had Padua scores of at least 4 points at admission. Regarding the severity of COVID-19, 543 (48.7%), 315 (28.2%), 204 (18.3%), and 54 (4.8%) patients had mild, moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19, respectively. Nine patients (0.8%) died, and 47 patients (4.2%) were transferred to other hospitals for intensive care. The primary outcome occurred in only 5 patients (0.5%; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8) and consisted of 3 ischemic strokes, 2 limb ischemia events, and one asymptomatic pulmonary embolism. Even in the 204 patients with severe COVID-19, the prevalence of thromboembolic complications was only 2.5% (95% CI, 0.3-4.6).ConclusionThromboembolic complications of COVID-19 are rare even in severe cases in a medical ward in a Japanese hospital. Further studies are needed to identify severe COVID-19 patients with a higher risk for thromboembolic complications in Japan.
| S-EPMC9387656 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveA predictive model for hospitalization due to COVID-19 or death was developed in the placebo group (N=2084) from a large clinical trial of colchicine in COVID-19 patients (N = 4159).ResultsThe seven variables retained in the predictive model were age, sex, body-mass index, history of respiratory disease, use of diabetes drugs, use of anticoagulants and use of oral steroids at the time of randomization. An optimal threshold value identified from the predictive model was used to classify high-risk patients (those with a predicted probability above the optimal threshold) and low-risk patients (those with a predicted probability below the optimal threshold). The number needed to treat to prevent one hospitalization or death with colchicine treatment decreased from 71 in the whole study population (N = 4159) to 29 in the high-risk subgroup (N=1692).ConclusionThis model could serve to identify high-risk subjects who will particularly benefit from early colchicine therapy.
| S-EPMC8758567 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAnastomotic complications are common after lung transplantation (1.4-33% of cases) and still associated with a high morbi-mortality.MethodsThe current study is a monocenter retrospective analysis of symptomatic anastomotic complications (SAC) occurring after lung transplantation between 2010 and 2016, using the macroscopic, diameter, and suture (M-D-S) classification from consensus of French experts in bronchoscopy. The objectives were to determine incidence from surgery, risk factors, and impact of survival of SAC. We defined SAC as M-D-S abnormalities (stenosis ⩾ 50% or dehiscence) requiring bronchoscopic or surgical interventions.ResultsA total of 121 patients were included. SAC occurred in 26.5% of patients (n = 32), divided in symptomatic stenosis for 23.7% (n = 29), and symptomatic dehiscence in 2.5% (n = 3). In multivariate analysis, donor bacterial lung infection [HR 2.08 (1.04-4.17), p = 0.04] and age above 50 years [HR 3.26 (1.04-10.26), p = 0.04] were associated with SAC occurrence. Cystic fibrosis etiology was associated with better survival on Kaplan-Meier curve (p < 0.001). SAC [HR 2.15 (1.07-4.32), p = 0.03] was independently associated with worst survival. The 29 symptomatic patients because of stenosis required endoscopic procedure, of whom 16 patients needed bronchial stent placement. Four patients underwent surgery: three patients because of dehiscence and one because of severe bilateral stenosis (re-transplantation).DiscussionSAC occurred in 26.5% of patients. Donor lung infection was the only alterable identified factors. The increase rate of SAC in older patients above 50 years of age encourages in regular endoscopic monitoring.
| S-EPMC9340386 | biostudies-literature
Project description:CAPSULE SUMMARY:This study describes the presenting characteristics of patients with asthma and COVID-19 in a US health care system, establishing an evidence base for risk evaluation and clinical care for asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic.
| S-EPMC7387277 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract Background Migrants and ethnic minorities have been shown to be at increased risk of hospitalization from COVID-19, our aim was to analyze the contribution of socioeconomic and demographic risk factors on hospital admissions for COVID-19 among migrants and ethnic minorities compared to the majority population. Methods We used nationwide register data on all hospitalized COVID-19 cases between February and June 2020 (n = 2232) and random controls from the general population (n = 498117). We performed logistic regression analyses, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, and socioeconomic and demographic factors. Main outcome measure was Hospitalization with COVID-19. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are estimated by using logistic regression analyses, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, and socioeconomic and demographic factors. Results Among 2232 COVID-19 cases, the OR of hospitalization with COVID-19 among immigrants and descendants of Non-Western origin was 2.5 times higher (95% CI: 2.23 to 2.89) than that of the majority population, with most pronounced results among individuals from Iraq, Morocco, Pakistan, and Somalia. The OR was largely attributed to comorbidity and socioeconomic factors, especially household size, occupation, and population density. Conclusion There is a significantly higher OR of hospitalization with COVID-19 among Non-Western migrants and ethnic minorities compared with ethnic Danes. This knowledge is crucial for health policymakers and practitioners in both the current and future pandemics to identify more vulnerable groups and target prevention initiatives.
| S-EPMC8586727 | biostudies-literature