Dataset Information

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-specific version of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) for patients with interstitial lung disease.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-specific version of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) is a valid tool to assess health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).

Objective

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the SGRQ-I to Brazilian-Portuguese, and to assess its measurement properties.

Methods

Phase one consisted of the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire. In phase two, intra- and inter-assessor reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), internal consistency (Cronbach's α), minimal detectable change (MDC), ceiling/floor effects, convergent validity (correlation with SF-36 questionnaire), and discriminative validity (according to clinical characteristics) were investigated.

Results

No significant adaptations were needed during the translation process of the SGRQ-I. In phase two, 30 patients with ILD were included (15 men; age 59 ± 10 years; Forced Vital Capacity 73 [61-80]%predicted). The total score on the SGRQ-I presented excellent intra-assessor (ICC: 0.93; 95%CI: 0.85, 0.97]) and inter-assessor (ICC: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.77, 0.94) agreement. Internal consistency was considered adequate for the domains impact, activity, and total score (0.79<α<0.88) but not for symptoms (α=0.43). MDC was 12.8 points and ceiling/floor effects were found in only 3% of patients. No discriminative validity was observed, but there was adequate convergent validity.

Conclusion

The results provide preliminary evidence of adequate measurement properties and validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the SGRQ-I for patients with ILDs.

SUBMITTER: Aguiar WF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8721060 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQL) is impaired in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). HRQL is often measured using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) despite the development of an IPF-specific version (SGRQ-I). Using data from a real-world cohort of patients with IPF, we aimed to transform SGRQ into a derived version of SGRQ-I, SGRQ-Ider, to examine the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of SGRQ-Ider and to compare SGRQ-Ider to SGRQ-I.MethodsBased on results from SGRQ, SGRQ-Ider was derived applying the algorithm used to develop SGRQ-I. Of the 50 items in SGRQ, 34 items were retained in SGRQ-Ider. Response options for seven items were collapsed and minor adjustments were made to the weights of two items after correspondence with the developers of SGRQ-I. Cross-sectional validation, responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were assessed by comparison to other HRQL instruments, pulmonary function tests and 6-min walk test performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Furthermore, the association between SGRQ-Ider scores and mortality was examined.ResultsA total of 150 IPF patients participated and 124 completed follow-up at 12 months. SGRQ-Ider performed comparably to SGRQ-I with a high concurrent validity, good test-retest reliability and high known-groups validity. SGRQ-Ider was responsive to change in HRQL and physiological anchors. MCID of SGRQ-Ider for improvement and deterioration was 3.5 and 5.7, respectively. SGRQ-Ider scores were associated with mortality in both univariate (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.42-2.34 per 20-point increase) and multivariate analyses (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.05 per 20-point increase).ConclusionsThe SGRQ-Ider is a valid, reliable and responsive HRQL instrument in patients with IPF and has psychometric properties comparable to SGRQ-I. Thus, SGRQ results can reliably be transformed into the SGRQ-Ider. The MCID estimates were calculated for improvement and deterioration separately. Increasing SGRQ-Ider score was associated with increased mortality.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Despite the general agreement regarding the central role of the clinical learning environment in graduate medical education, its assessment remains challenging owing to the lack of available standardized measures. We report on the cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of Seelig's Resident Questionnaire. METHODS:The present study was performed in two steps. First, a cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Resident Questionnaire was conducted through multiple translations, synthesis of versions, back-translation, content validation, and face validation. Subsequently, a sample of 288 (72%) resident physicians enrolled in 40 residency programs at a Brazilian university hospital completed the following measures: 1) the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Resident Questionnaire (for factor analysis and to determine internal consistency, reliability, and validity); 2) three existing, validated psychometric measures (to determine convergent and divergent validity); and 3) a self-report questionnaire. RESULTS:Confirmatory factor analysis results provided support for the three-dimensional model of the Resident Questionnaire in use on a sample of Brazilian resident physicians, having been previously verified for use in American samples. All three factors (emotional distress, learning environment satisfaction, and workload satisfaction) verified in the confirmatory factor analysis showed good internal consistency (? > .80), reliability (Raykov's rho > .80), and correlations in the expected directions and magnitude with measures of depressive symptoms, duty hours, organizational conditions, and emotional exhaustion. CONCLUSIONS:This study is the first to adapt a measure of the clinical learning environment of residency programs into Brazilian Portuguese. Our findings suggest that the adapted version of the Resident Questionnaire is valid and reliable for assessing Brazilian residency programs. This free, easy-access, and fast-application instrument may be a useful standardized measure for research and educational purposes concerning the clinical learning environments of resident physicians.