Ranking procedures for repeated measures designs with missing data: Estimation, testing and asymptotic theory.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Rubarth K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8721540 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:SummaryLarge-scale transcriptome studies with multiple samples per individual are widely used to study disease biology. Yet, current methods for differential expression are inadequate for cross-individual testing for these repeated measures designs. Most problematic, we observe across multiple datasets that current methods can give reproducible false-positive findings that are driven by genetic regulation of gene expression, yet are unrelated to the trait of interest. Here, we introduce a statistical software package, dream, that increases power, controls the false positive rate, enables multiple types of hypothesis tests, and integrates with standard workflows. In 12 analyses in 6 independent datasets, dream yields biological insight not found with existing software while addressing the issue of reproducible false-positive findings.Availability and implementationDream is available within the variancePartition Bioconductor package at http://bioconductor.org/packages/variancePartition.Contactgabriel.hoffman@mssm.edu.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
| S-EPMC8055218 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In 2008, a successful computational design procedure was reported that yielded active enzyme catalysts for the Kemp elimination. Here, we studied these proteins together with a set of previously unpublished inactive designs to determine the sources of activity or lack thereof, and to predict which of the designed structures are most likely to be catalytic. Methods that range from quantum mechanics (QM) on truncated model systems to the treatment of the full protein with ONIOM QM/MM and AMBER molecular dynamics (MD) were explored. The most effective procedure involved molecular dynamics, and a general MD protocol was established. Substantial deviations from the ideal catalytic geometries were observed for a number of designs. Penetration of water into the catalytic site and insufficient residue-packing around the active site are the main factors that can cause enzyme designs to be inactive. Where in the past, computational evaluations of designed enzymes were too time-extensive for practical considerations, it has now become feasible to rank and refine candidates computationally prior to and in conjunction with experimentation, thus markedly increasing the efficiency of the enzyme design process.
| S-EPMC2975139 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although complete randomization ensures covariate balance on average, the chance of observing significant differences between treatment and control covariate distributions increases with many covariates. Rerandomization discards randomizations that do not satisfy a predetermined covariate balance criterion, generally resulting in better covariate balance and more precise estimates of causal effects. Previous theory has derived finite sample theory for rerandomization under the assumptions of equal treatment group sizes, Gaussian covariate and outcome distributions, or additive causal effects, but not for the general sampling distribution of the difference-in-means estimator for the average causal effect. We develop asymptotic theory for rerandomization without these assumptions, which reveals a non-Gaussian asymptotic distribution for this estimator, specifically a linear combination of a Gaussian random variable and truncated Gaussian random variables. This distribution follows because rerandomization affects only the projection of potential outcomes onto the covariate space but does not affect the corresponding orthogonal residuals. We demonstrate that, compared with complete randomization, rerandomization reduces the asymptotic quantile ranges of the difference-in-means estimator. Moreover, our work constructs accurate large-sample confidence intervals for the average causal effect.
| S-EPMC6140533 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Traditional dose-finding designs are substantially inefficient for targeted agents and cancer immunotherapies by failing to incorporate efficacy signals, mild and moderate adverse events, and late, cumulative toxicities. However, the lack of user-friendly software is a barrier to the practical use of the novel phase I designs, despite their demonstrated superiority of traditional 3+3 designs. To overcome these barriers, we present an R package, phase1RMD, which provides a comprehensive implementation of novel designs with repeated toxicity measures and early efficacy. A novel phase I repeated measures design that used a continuous toxicity score from multiple treatment cycles was implemented. Furthermore, in studies where preliminary efficacy is evaluated, an adaptive, multi-stage design to identify the most efficacious dose with acceptable toxicity was demonstrated. Functions are provided to recommend the next dose based on the data collected in a phase I trial, as well as to assess trial characteristics given design parameters via simulations. The repeated measure designs accurately estimated both the magnitude and direction of toxicity trends in late treatment cycles, and allocated more patients at therapeutic doses. The R package for implementing these designs is available from the Comprehensive R Archive Network. To our best knowledge, this is the first software that implement novel phase I dose-finding designs that simultaneously accounts for the multiple-grade toxicity events over multiple treatment cycles and a continuous early efficacy outcome. With the software published on CRAN, we will pursue the implementation of these designs in phase I trials in real-life settings.
| S-EPMC8412295 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Asymptotic robustness against misspecification of the underlying distribution for the polychoric correlation estimation is studied. The asymptotic normality of the pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator is derived using the two-step estimation procedure. The t distribution assumption and the skew-normal distribution assumption are used as alternatives to the normal distribution assumption in a numerical study. The numerical results show that the underlying normal distribution can be substantially biased, even though skewness and kurtosis are not large. The skew-normal assumption generally produces a lower bias than the normal assumption. Thus, it is worth using a non-normal distributional assumption if the normal assumption is dubious.
| S-EPMC5591612 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:The prospect of assessing cognition longitudinally and remotely is attractive to researchers, health practitioners, and pharmaceutical companies alike. However, such repeated testing regimes place a considerable burden on participants, and with cognitive tasks typically being regarded as effortful and unengaging, these studies may experience high levels of participant attrition. One potential solution is to gamify these tasks to make them more engaging: increasing participant willingness to take part and reducing attrition. However, such an approach must balance task validity with the introduction of entertaining gamelike elements. OBJECTIVE:This study aims to investigate the effects of gamelike features on participant attrition using a between-subjects, longitudinal Web-based testing study. METHODS:We used three variants of a common cognitive task, the Stop Signal Task (SST), with a single gamelike feature in each: one variant where points were rewarded for performing optimally; another where the task was given a graphical theme; and a third variant, which was a standard SST and served as a control condition. Participants completed four compulsory test sessions over 4 consecutive days before entering a 6-day voluntary testing period where they faced a daily decision to either drop out or continue taking part. Participants were paid for each session they completed. RESULTS:A total of 482 participants signed up to take part in the study, with 265 completing the requisite four consecutive test sessions. No evidence of an effect of gamification on attrition was observed. A log-rank test showed no evidence of a difference in dropout rates between task variants (?22=3.0, P=.22), and a one-way analysis of variance of the mean number of sessions completed per participant in each variant also showed no evidence of a difference (F2,262=1.534, P=.21, partial ?2=0.012). CONCLUSIONS:Our findings raise doubts about the ability of gamification to reduce attrition from longitudinal cognitive testing studies.
| S-EPMC5719230 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTraditional clinical assessments are used extensively in neurology; however, they can be coarse, which can also make them insensitive to change. Kinarm is a robotic assessment system that has been used for precise assessment of individuals with neurological impairments. However, this precision also leads to the challenge of identifying whether a given change in performance reflects a significant change in an individual's ability or is simply natural variation. Our objective here is to derive confidence intervals and thresholds of significant change for Kinarm Standard Tests™ (KST).MethodsWe assessed participants twice within 15 days on all tasks presently available in KST. We determined the 5-95% confidence intervals for each task parameter, and derived thresholds for significant change. We tested for learning effects and corrected for the false discovery rate (FDR) to identify task parameters with significant learning effects. Finally, we calculated intraclass correlation of type ICC [1, 2] (ICC-C) to quantify consistency across assessments.ResultsWe recruited an average of 56 participants per task. Confidence intervals for Z-Task Scores ranged between 0.61 and 1.55, and the threshold for significant change ranged between 0.87 and 2.19. We determined that 4/11 tasks displayed learning effects that were significant after FDR correction; these 4 tasks primarily tested cognition or cognitive-motor integration. ICC-C values for Z-Task Scores ranged from 0.26 to 0.76.ConclusionsThe present results provide statistical bounds on individual performance for KST as well as significant changes across repeated testing. Most measures of performance had good inter-rater reliability. Tasks with a higher cognitive burden seemed to be more susceptible to learning effects, which should be taken into account when interpreting longitudinal assessments of these tasks.
| S-EPMC7331240 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recently, new tests for main and simple treatment effects, time effects, and treatment by time interactions in possibly high-dimensional multigroup repeated-measures designs with unequal covariance matrices have been proposed. Technical details for using more than one between-subject and more than one within-subject factor are presented in this article. Furthermore, application to electroencephalography (EEG) data of a neurological study with two whole-plot factors (diagnosis and sex) and two subplot factors (variable and region) is shown with the R package HRM (high-dimensional repeated measures).
| S-EPMC5546067 | biostudies-other
Project description:To access the reliability of a new dichotomous test and to capture the random variability of its results in the absence of a gold standard, two measures, the inconsistent acceptance probability (IAP) and inconsistent rejection probability (IRP), were introduced in the literature. In this paper, we first analyze the limiting behavior of both measures as the number of test repetitions increases and derive the corresponding accuracy estimates and rates of convergence. To overcome possible limitations of IRP and IAP, we then introduce a one-parameter family of refined reliability measures, Δ(k,s) . Such measures characterize the consistency of the results of a dichotomous test in the absence of a gold standard as the threshold for a positive aggregate test result varies. Similar to IRP and IAP, we also derive corresponding accuracy estimates and rates of convergence for Δ(k,s) as the number k of test repetitions increases.Supplementary informationThe online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00362-021-01266-9.
| S-EPMC8492041 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Repeated measures correlation (rmcorr) is a statistical technique for determining the common within-individual association for paired measures assessed on two or more occasions for multiple individuals. Simple regression/correlation is often applied to non-independent observations or aggregated data; this may produce biased, specious results due to violation of independence and/or differing patterns between-participants versus within-participants. Unlike simple regression/correlation, rmcorr does not violate the assumption of independence of observations. Also, rmcorr tends to have much greater statistical power because neither averaging nor aggregation is necessary for an intra-individual research question. Rmcorr estimates the common regression slope, the association shared among individuals. To make rmcorr accessible, we provide background information for its assumptions and equations, visualization, power, and tradeoffs with rmcorr compared to multilevel modeling. We introduce the R package (rmcorr) and demonstrate its use for inferential statistics and visualization with two example datasets. The examples are used to illustrate research questions at different levels of analysis, intra-individual, and inter-individual. Rmcorr is well-suited for research questions regarding the common linear association in paired repeated measures data. All results are fully reproducible.
| S-EPMC5383908 | biostudies-literature