Dataset Information

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer: a 10-year single institution experience.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Moderately post-operative hypofractionated radiotherapy (HYPO-RT) for breast cancer is a safe and effective strategy as seen in large prospective trials. This study aimed to assess overall and disease-free survivals, local control, and acute and late toxicities in patients treated with HYPO-RT.

Materials and methods

Data from patients submitted to post-operative HYPO-RT, with or without boost, were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected.

Results

From March 2009 to December 2016, 393 patients were treated. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 94.7%, immediate reconstruction after mastectomy in 6 (1.5%). Most patients (91.2%) had initial stage (0 to IIA), and chemotherapy was performed in 42.0%, HYPO-RT was mainly performed in 15 or 16 daily fractions of 267 cGy and 265 cGy, respectively. The median follow-up was 5.7 years. There were 25 deaths (6.4%) and 17 (4.3%) local recurrences. At 5 and 10 years, the overall survival, local control, and disease-free survival were, respectively, 96.0% and 79.3%, 99.2% and 94.9%, 96.6%, and 91.9%. Acute grade 3 or 4 dermatitis was observed in 0.9%. Late grade 1 or 2 occurred in less than 3% of the patients.

Conclusion

HYPO-RT is a safe and effective radiotherapy regimen with excellent disease control and overall survival rates, with low acute and late toxicity rates.

SUBMITTER: Najas GF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8726432 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose/objectiveWe present our single-institution experience in the management of invasive breast cancer with targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT), focusing on patient suitability for IORT determined by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) consensus guidelines.Materials/methodsWe identified 237 patients treated for biopsy-proven early-stage invasive breast cancer using low energy x-ray TARGIT-IORT at the time of lumpectomy between September 2013 and April 2020 who were prospectively enrolled in an institutional review board (IRB) approved database. We retrospectively reviewed preoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic factors to determine each patient's ASTRO APBI suitability (suitable, cautionary or unsuitable) according to the 2017 consensus guidelines (CG). Change in suitability group was determined based on final pathology. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the survival probability and recurrence probability across time.Results237 patients were included in this analysis, based on preoperative clinicopathologic characteristics, 191 (80.6%) patients were suitable, 46 (19.4%) were cautionary and none were deemed unsuitable. Suitability classification changed in 95 (40%) patients based on final pathology from lumpectomy. Increasing preoperative lesion size or a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 were significant predictors for suitability group change. Forty-one (17.3%) patients received additional adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy after TARGIT-IORT. At a median follow up of 38.2 months (range 0.4 - 74.5), five (2.1%) patients had ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR), including two (0.8%) true local recurrences defined as a recurrence in the same quadrant as the initial lumpectomy bed with the same histology as the initial tumor. IBTR occurred in 1/103 (0.09%) patient in the post-op suitable group, 4/98 (4.08%) patients in the post-op cautionary group, and no patients in the post-op unsuitable group. At 3-years, the overall survival rate was 98.4% and the local recurrence free survival rate was 97.1%.ConclusionThere is a low rate of IBTR after TARGIT-IORT when used in appropriately selected patients. Change in suitability classification pre to postoperatively is common, highlighting a need for further investigation to optimize preoperative patient risk stratification in this setting. Patients who become cautionary or unsuitable based on final pathology should be considered for additional adjuvant therapy.

Project description:BackgroundIt is estimated that one of the potential cause of the increasing prevalence of thyroid cancer (TC) is the easier and widespread access to diagnostic tools. If an individual evaluates the thyroid gland due to a mentioned mechanism without considering TC risk factors or symptoms, we can describe this phenomenon as cancer screening activity (CSA).Aim of the studyWe 1) estimated what types of TC were diagnosed due to CSA, 2) analyzed what clinicopathological features were characteristic of TCs diagnosed by CSA, 3) determined if these features were characteristic of indolent cases, and finally we 4) assessed whether CSA could have resulted in the increasing incidence of potentially indolent papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).Materials and methodsA retrospective review of 4,701 medical records of patients admitted and surgically treated at one surgical center between 2008 and 2017 was performed. Among the enrolled patients, 569 (12.1%) had thyroid malignancy, and 514 (10.9%) were diagnosed with PTC. We divided these patients into two groups: 1) patients in whom TC diagnostics were performed without considering any TC risk factors or symptoms (CSA-yes) and 2) those in whom TC was diagnosed due to TC risk factors or symptoms (CSA-no). We then compared the clinicopathological features of these two groups.ResultsThe most common type of TC diagnosed in the CSA-group was PTC (p = 0.024). CSA-yes patients showed a significantly lower degree of Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging and demonstrated a significantly lower rate of multifocality, but not of bilaterality (p<0.0001 and p = 0.198, respectively). In the CSA-yes group, the number of TC foci was significantly lower than that in the CSA-no group (p<0.0001). All clinicopathological features characteristic of aggressive cases of TC were absent in CSA-yes patients (p<0.0001), while all features observed in CSA-yes patients were characteristic of indolent cases (p<0.0001).ConclusionsThe use of CSA results in the diagnosis of indolent cases of PTC and may be one of the potential causes of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of this malignancy.

Project description:PurposeTo characterize our experience and the disease control and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).Patients and methodsClinical outcomes for patients with HNC treated with PT at our institution were prospectively collected in 2 institutional review board-approved prospective studies. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes. Overall survival, local-regional control, and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related toxicities were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) scale.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 573 patients treated from February 2006 to June 2018. Median patient age was 61 years. Oropharynx (33.3%; n = 191), paranasal sinus (11%; n = 63), and periorbital tissues (11%; n = 62) were the most common primary sites. Patients with T3/T4 or recurrent disease comprised 46% (n = 262) of the cohort. The intent of PT was definitive in 53% (n = 303), postoperative in 37% (n = 211), and reirradiation in 10% (n = 59). Median dose was 66 Gy (radiobiological equivalent). Regarding systemic therapy, 43% had received concurrent (n = 244), 3% induction (n = 19), and 15% (n = 86) had both. At a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 88 patients (15%) had died and 127 (22%) developed disease recurrence. The overall survival, local-regional control, and disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years were, respectively, 87% and 75%, 87% and 78%, and 74% and 63%. Maximum toxicity (acute or late) was grade 3 in 293 patients (51%), grade 2 in 234 patients (41%), and grade 1 in 31 patients (5%). There were 381 acute grade 3 and 190 late grade 3 unique toxicities across 212 (37%) and 150 (26%) patients, respectively. There were 3 late-grade 4 events across 2 patients (0.3%), 2 (0.3%) acute-grade 5, and no (0%) late-grade 5 events.ConclusionsThe overall results from this prospective study of our initial decade of experience with PT for HNC show favorable disease control and toxicity outcomes in a multidisease-site cohort and provide a reference benchmark for future comparison and study.

Project description:Background: Denosumab is approved to prevent fragility fractures in patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture and to prevent bone loss in patients with breast and prostate cancer who receive endocrine therapy. The antiresorptive effect of denosumab rapidly dissipates when it is delayed or discontinued, but the risk for, and incidence of, multiple clinical vertebral fractures in patients with breast cancer after stopping denosumab is currently unclear. Question/Purposes: We sought to identify the incidence of clinical vertebral fractures in patients with breast cancer who received at least 2 doses of denosumab (60 mg) and then discontinued the medication. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients with a history of breast cancer who were treated with denosumab between June 1, 2010, and July 18, 2018, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We identified 335 postmenopausal women and 1 man with nonmetastatic breast cancer who received their final denosumab injection at least 6.5 months earlier. Data recorded included baseline bone density and the incidence of vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation. Results: The median age of patients was 62 years. Patients received between 2 and 13 denosumab doses before drug discontinuation. Most of the patients (310; 92.3%) were also treated with aromatase inhibitors. Of the 194 patients with baseline bone density data, 50 (25.8%) had normal bone density, 97 (50.0%) had osteopenia, and 47 (24.2%) had osteoporosis. The median follow-up duration from the last denosumab dose was 18.5 months. We identified 1 case of spontaneous vertebral fractures after denosumab stoppage. We found no cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femur fracture. Most of the patients (88%) had a gap in denosumab dosing. Conclusions: Clinicians treating patients with breast cancer-especially those continuing to take aromatase inhibitors-should be aware of the possible risks of delaying doses of or discontinuing denosumab and should educate their patients accordingly. Prospective studies are needed to fully evaluate the risks of stopping or delaying denosumab.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Desmoid-type fibromatosis is a rare, potentially locally aggressive disease. Herein we present our experience in the treatment with radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS:In total 40 patients who received 44 treatments from 2009 to 2018 at the Heidelberg University Hospital with photons (N =?28) as well as protons (N =?15) and carbon ions (N =?1) were investigated. The median age at radiotherapy was 41?years [range 8-78]. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) was confirmed for nine patients and 30 had a unifocal desmoid tumor. The localizations were abdominal wall, abdominopelvic cavity, thoracic wall, extremity, head and neck and trunk. The median prescribed dose was 54?Gy/ Gy (RBE) [range 39.6-66, IQR 50-60]. Eleven treatments were performed at the time of first diagnosis; 33 at the time of progression or recurrence. Post-operative radiotherapy was performed in 17 cases. The median planning target volume was 967?ml [84-4364?ml, IQR 447-1988]. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier Method. RESULTS:The median follow-up time was 32?months [1-153]. At the end of the follow-up interval all patients but one were alive. The estimated local progression free survival of the treated lesion in 3 and 5?years was 76.4% and 63,8%, respectively. The progression-free survival in 3 and 5?years was 72.3 and 58.4% and the overall survival was 97.4 and 97.4%, respectively. In case of macroscopic tumor (N =?31) before radiotherapy a partial remission was observed in 12 cases (38.7%) and a complete remission in 4 cases (12.9%). Progression was observed in 13 (29.5%) cases, predominantly at the margin of the planning target volume (PTV, N =?5, 38,4%) followed by progression within the PTV (N =?4, 30.8%). In univariate analysis multifocal localization was associated with impaired progression-free survival (p =?0.013). One patient developed a grade V gastrointestinal bleeding, otherwise no acute toxicity >°III was observed. Late toxicity was depending on the localization of the desmoid tumor and was especially severe in patients with FAP and abdominopelvine desmoids including gastrointesinal fistula, perforation and abscess. CONCLUSION:Radiotherapy in the treatment of desmoids can lead to long term control. Treatment of patients with abdominopelvine desmoids should be avoided, as the risk of higher-grade complications is substantial.