Dataset Information

Psychological distress after esophageal cancer surgery and the predictive effect of dispositional optimism: a nationwide population-based longitudinal study.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To examine the trajectory of psychological distress from 1 to 2 years after esophageal cancer surgery, and whether dispositional optimism could predict the risk of postoperative psychological distress.

Methods

This Swedish nationwide longitudinal study included 192 patients who had survived for 1 year after esophageal cancer surgery. We measured dispositional optimism with the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) 1 year post-surgery and psychological distress with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale 1, 1.5, and 2 years post-surgery. Latent growth curve models were used to assess the trajectory of postoperative psychological distress and to examine the predictive validity of dispositional optimism.

Results

One year after surgery, 11.5% (22 of 192) patients reported clinically significant psychological distress, and the proportion increased to 18.8% at 1.5 years and to 25.0% at 2 years post-surgery. Higher dispositional optimism predicted a lower probability of self-reported psychological distress at 1, 1.5, and 2 years after esophageal cancer surgery. For each point increase in the LOT-R sum score, the odds of psychological distress decreased by 44% (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.79).

Conclusion

The high prevalence and longitudinal increase of self-reported psychological distress after esophageal cancer surgery indicate the unmet demands for timely psychological screening and interventions. Measuring dispositional optimism may help identify patients at higher risk of developing psychological distress, thereby contributing to the prevention of postoperative psychological distress.

SUBMITTER: Liu Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8727404 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPsychological distress post lumbar spine surgery is associated with poorer outcomes. There is a scarcity of studies devoted to analyzing the risk factors associated with psychological distress in patients who have undergone lumbar fusion surgery. The purpose of this study was to (1) describe the time course and severity of psychological distress using the STarT Back Tool (SBT) and (2) determine the demographic and clinical predictors of SBT score post lumbar spine fusion surgery.MethodsThis retrospective longitudinal study analyzed 227 subjects with 1- and 2-level lumbar fusion surgery who underwent standardized assessment preoperatively and at 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Preoperative variables collected were demographic, clinical, and psychological variables. Postoperative psychological distress was measured by self-reported SBT. Risk factors for SBT over time were identified using ordinal and mixed-effects modelling.ResultsAlthough the trajectory of SBT levels declined postoperatively over time, at week-12, 20% of patients had moderate to high SBT. Postoperative SBT scores at week-4 time point was significantly greater than SBT scores at week-8 (OR = 2.7, 95% credible interval [CrI]; 1.8-3.9). Greater SBT scores at week-4 were strongly associated with greater SBT scores throughout 12 weeks of follow-up (OR = 7.3, [95% CrI; 1.2-31.4]). Greater postoperative SBT levels over time were associated with being male (OR = 2.2, 95% CrI; 1.0-3.9), greater preoperative back or leg pain intensity (OR = 2.2; 95% CrI: 1.0-4.4), greater preoperative leg weakness (OR = 4.2, 95% CrI: 1.7-7.5) and higher preoperative depression levels (OR = 4.8; 95% CrI: 1.6-10.4).ConclusionPostoperative SBT levels declined nonlinearly over time. However, a sizable proportion of patients had moderate to high psychological distress at week-12 postsurgery. Greater preoperative back or leg pain intensity, leg weakness and depression levels, and male gender were risk factors of greater psychological distress postsurgery. Although requiring validation, our study has identified potential modifiable risk factors which may give an opportunity to provide early (preoperative) and targeted strategies to optimize postoperative psychosocial outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgeries.

Project description:Higher levels of optimism have been linked with positive health behaviors, biological processes, and health conditions that are potentially protective against cognitive impairment in older adults. However, the association between optimism and cognitive impairment has not been directly investigated. We examined whether optimism is associated with incident cognitive impairment in older adults.Data are from the Health and Retirement Study. Optimism was measured by using the Life Orientation Test-R and cognitive impairment with a modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status derived from the Mini-Mental State Examination. Using multiple logistic regression models, we prospectively assessed whether optimism was associated with incident cognitive impairment in 4624 adults 65 years and older during a 4-year period.Among participants, 312 women and 190 men developed cognitive impairment during the 4-year follow-up. Higher optimism was associated with decreased risk of incident cognitive impairment. When adjusted for sociodemographic factors, each standard deviation increase in optimism was associated with reduced odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.61-0.81) of becoming cognitively impaired. A dose-response relationship was observed. Compared with those with the lowest levels of optimism, people with moderate levels had somewhat reduced odds of cognitive impairment (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.59-1.03), whereas people with the highest levels had the lowest odds of cognitive impairment (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.74). These associations remained after adjusting for health behaviors, biological factors, and psychological covariates that could either confound the association of interest or serve on the pathway.Optimism was prospectively associated with a reduced likelihood of becoming cognitively impaired. If these results are replicated, the data suggest that potentially modifiable aspects of positive psychological functioning such as optimism play an important role in maintaining cognitive functioning.