Integrating the Electronic Health Record Into Patient Encounters: An Introductory Standardized Patient Exercise for Preclinical Medical Students.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
Increasingly, use of the electronic health record (EHR) is interwoven into even the most basic patient care tasks. Accordingly, learning how to utilize the EHR during patient encounters is important for medical students as they develop their clinical skills. Existing EHR curricula have focused primarily on doctor-patient relationship skills. We developed a session for our preclinical students on EHR-related doctor-patient relationship skills as well as on using the EHR to verify data and focus one's history taking.Methods
We developed student notes, three training videos, four standardized patient (SP) cases, and a simplified, simulated EHR based on these cases. Students reviewed the notes and videos prior to class. During class, students practiced EHR-related communication and data-collection strategies by interviewing an SP while interacting with the simulated EHR. Following each encounter, students received feedback from a small group of peers and faculty.Results
Two-hundred eighty-nine second-year medical students participated this session in 2019 and 2020, and 27 (19%, 2019) and 40 (28%, 2020) students, respectively, completed the postsession evaluation. Most respondents rated the SP activity as extremely or quite effective for practicing doctor-patient relationship strategies while interacting with the EHR (89%, 2019; 83%, 2020) and for practicing verification of EHR data during a patient encounter (81%, 2019; 86%, 2020).Discussion
This training session was effective for introducing preclinical medical students to fundamental concepts and skills related to incorporating the EHR into patient encounters and offers a low-cost approach to teaching early medical students these important skills.
SUBMITTER: Cristiano JA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8727442 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundShared decision-making, in which physicians and patients openly explore beliefs, exchange information, and reach explicit closure, may represent optimal physician-patient communication. There are currently no universally accepted methods to assess medical students' competence in shared decision-making.ObjectiveTo characterize medical students' shared decision-making with standardized patients (SPs) and determine if students' use of shared decision-making correlates with SP ratings of their communication.DesignRetrospective study of medical students' performance with four SPs.ParticipantsSixty fourth-year medical students.MeasurementsObjective blinded coding of shared decision-making quantified as decision moments (exploration/articulation of perspective, information sharing, explicit closure for a particular decision); SP scoring of communication skills using a validated checklist.ResultsOf 779 decision moments generated in 240 encounters, 312 (40%) met criteria for shared decision-making. All students engaged in shared decision-making in at least two of the four cases, although in two cases 5% and 12% of students engaged in no shared decision-making. The most commonly discussed decision moment topics were medications (n?=?98, 31%), follow-up visits (71, 23%), and diagnostic testing (44, 14%). Correlations between the number of decision moments in a case and students' communication scores were low (rho?=?0.07 to 0.37).ConclusionsAlthough all students engaged in some shared decision-making, particularly regarding medical interventions, there was no correlation between shared decision-making and overall communication competence rated by the SPs. These findings suggest that SP ratings of students' communication skill cannot be used to infer students' use of shared decision-making. Tools to determine students' skill in shared decision-making are needed.
| S-EPMC3055961 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPharmacology is an important learning topic in preclinical medical education. Simulated patient encounters allow students to apply basic science knowledge in a clinical setting and have been useful in previous studies of pharmacology education. We developed a standardized patient (SP) encounter to reinforce antiviral pharmacology content for first-year medical students.MethodsStudents were instructed to recommend a medication for shingles during an SP encounter and to answer questions from the SP on mechanism of action and adverse effects. Students then attended a large-group debrief session. Following the activity, students evaluated the exercise through a voluntary survey. For knowledge assessment, students were randomized into two groups to complete three multiple-choice questions either before or after the learning activity.ResultsIn 2020 and 2021, 144 and 145 students, respectively, participated. In 2020, there was no significant difference in the proportion of correct answers between the pre- and postsimulation groups (p > .05). In 2021, the postsimulation group significantly outperformed the presimulation group in knowledge of mechanism of action (p < .01) and adverse effects (p < .01), but no difference was seen between the groups regarding medication selection (p = .27). Most learners assessed the instructional design as effective for the tasks assigned.DiscussionThis SP activity provided an opportunity for early medical students to practice integrating antiviral pharmacology knowledge into a patient encounter and was well received by learners. The instructional method offers a clinically relevant approach for reinforcing pharmacology knowledge for preclinical medical students.
| S-EPMC9038986 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionVirology is inherently challenging due to the sheer volume of information medical students are responsible for learning. Cognitive integration of this content is critical for early medical students to practice applying this knowledge to diagnostic problem-solving. Simulation offers learners engaging opportunities to practice cognitive integration. We developed a simulated clinic activity for first-year medical students consisting of standardized patient (SP) encounters representing viral infections.MethodsStudent small groups rotated through eight SP encounters during which they collected patient histories, reviewed physical exam findings, and developed a differential diagnosis and diagnostic plan for each case. The instructor debriefed students on the cases afterward. We assessed students' evaluation of the activity through online surveys.ResultsTwo hundred seventy-eight students participated in the simulated clinic in 2018 and 2019. Students rated the activity as very effective for learning about the infections represented and for providing opportunities to integrate clinical skills. Students agreed that the event's instructional design was appropriate for its objectives and that the problem-solving aspect was intellectually stimulating. They indicated that the most effective aspects were solidifying illness scripts for the infections represented, integrating knowledge and skills to diagnose patients in a realistic clinical context, and working collaboratively to problem-solve.DiscussionThe simulated virology clinic is an effective method for providing students opportunities to integrate microbiology and clinical skills and has been positively received by students. This instructional method offers learners an opportunity to solidify illness scripts for viral infections using an interactive, collaborative approach.
| S-EPMC7485908 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionObjective standardized teaching exercises (OSTEs) are widely used to develop professional competencies, especially in the health care professions. An OSTE involves exposing different providers to the same, time-limited scenario that is concurrently observed and/or recorded for either formative or summative evaluation. As there are limited resources available for creating a resident-specific OSTE, especially those applicable to family and community medicine residents, we created and evaluated a resident OSTE (R-OSTE) for second- and third-year family and community medicine residents.MethodsThis R-OSTE involved two cases. The first featured Taylor, a third-year medical student resistant to feedback. The second featured Kris, a first-year resident nervous about approaching the attending on duty. Our R-OSTE had residents teaching interpersonal skills to trained actors in a standardized learner role.ResultsResidents in the teaching role were formatively evaluated by peer observers (fellow residents) and standardized learners on interpersonal domains such as communication and professionalism. Learners gave residents an average performance rating of 4.9 on a 1 to 6 scale with 1 = Very Poor and 6 = Excellent. Residents also evaluated the OSTE itself, rating their experience on multiple teaching-related statements. Eighty-six percent of residents agreed this exercise was an appropriate development activity for family medicine residents. Overall, our R-OSTE was rated highly for relevance to teaching by the residents.DiscussionThe residents were rated highly by both peer observers and standardized learners. However, there was little variability in peer observer scores, indicating the need for an alternative method of measurement.
| S-EPMC6338149 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND :Residencies have incorporated high-value care (HVC) training to contain health care expenditures. Assessment methods of HVC curricula are limited. OBJECTIVE :In our clinical skills laboratory, we evaluated the effectiveness of HVC curricula using standardized patients (SPs) to determine if there is a correlation with performance in counseling, history and physical, HVC knowledge, and demographics. METHODS :Through ambulatory cases, SPs evaluated postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) residents using checklists to determine if they obtained the chief complaint, medical and social history, focused physical examination, and conveyed information regarding patient management. Investigators scored knowledge-based questions on the need for imaging in low back pain, annual stress testing in coronary artery disease, and chest x-ray for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Univariate analysis was used to calculate percentage distribution of residents' ordering of inappropriate tests. RESULTS :All 56 PGY-2 residents participated in the study and completed at least 2 of 3 HVC cases. Analysis showed that 48% (27 of 56) ordered at least 1 inappropriate test. Residents who ordered unnecessary testing had similar performance in history and physical as well as knowledge of HVC. Inappropriate ordering was significantly associated with poorer performance in counseling (mean percentage counseling score of 68% versus 56% for those who ordered inappropriately, P < .001) and communication skills (mean percentage communication score of 74% versus 71% for those who ordered inappropriately, P < .003). There were no patterns for ordering by demographics. CONCLUSIONS :Our evaluation of residents during SP encounters found a correlation between the use of inappropriate testing and lower counseling and communication skills.
| S-EPMC5646926 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction:The adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) presents new challenges for information gathering, documentation, and patient care. Medical students spend a significant amount of time using the EHR during their clerkship experiences and will continue to do so as they progress to residency. However, formal training varies between institutions and leaves gaps in data-gathering skills, documentation skills, and order entry-these three skills formed the basis for our learning objectives. We designed a workshop using a simulated EHR to teach these skills. Methods:We offered the workshop during a class-wide transition-to-internship course for senior medical students. After a brief didactic, students worked in small groups using a simulated EHR to complete cases addressing each of the three learning objectives. Faculty facilitators assisted groups and then guided a large-group discussion of the challenges encountered during the cases. Results:Twenty-five senior medical students attended the first optional workshop. Of these students, 66.7% recommended that the workshop continue to be included in the curriculum. Comments from those who recommended otherwise suggested that many of them would recommend the workshop if it used our local EHR (Epic). Correct answers to the factual questions increased for most questions between the pretest and the posttest. Confidence to perform all skills targeted in the learning objectives increased between the pretest and the posttest. Discussion:This EHR workshop was well received by senior medical students and increased confidence in EHR skills, including data gathering, documentation, and handling unsolicited information with a plan including order entry.
| S-EPMC6946580 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify whether or not elderspeak was evident in simulated provider-patient encounters in a chiropractic education program. This study was designed to answer the following three research questions (RQs):RQ 1: Is elderspeak present in simulated patient encounters in a chiropractic education program?RQ 2: If elderspeak is present, which categorization of elderspeak is most frequently used during simulated patient encounters?RQ 3: If elderspeak is present, is gender an influencing variable? Method: The presence of elderspeak in simulated chiropractic encounters was studied using a cross-sectional mixed methods observational research design. Results: A total of 331 occurrences of elderspeak were identified in 60 digitized recordings. The most common form of elderspeak was collective pronoun usage. Conclusion: Results indicated that the chiropractic industry is susceptible to elderspeak. Understanding elderspeak is important to prevent future ageist behaviors from affecting older adult patients and to improve their health outcomes.
| S-EPMC7243371 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionStudies show that physicians and medical trainees who identify as underrepresented in medicine or as women experience higher rates of microaggressions during patient encounters. We designed, implemented, and evaluated an active bystander training workshop focused on mitigating microaggressions using standardized patient (SP) methodology.MethodsInternal medicine faculty members and chief residents led the workshop. Participants included 31 PGY 1 categorical and preliminary internal medicine residents. They participated in three case simulations with SPs involving microaggressions from patients toward a member of the health care team. Prior to the case simulations, a brief presentation outlined examples of microaggressions and reviewed the behavioral response framework WAKE (work with who you are, ask questions/make direct statements, involve key people, and employ distraction techniques). After each encounter, residents debriefed with an internal medicine faculty member and discussed questions related to each scenario.ResultsAll 31 residents participated in the workshop and, before and after the activity, completed a survey that asked them to rank their agreement with statements via a Likert scale. Participants reported statistically significant improvement in recognizing microaggressions (12% reported increase, p = .002), the ability to respond to patients who exhibit microaggressions (23% reported increase, p < .001), and the ability to debrief with team members (20% reported increase, p < .001).DiscussionSP simulations can be an effective teaching modality for microaggression response strategies during patient encounters. Additional studies are needed to further characterize the workshop's effect on other medical workforce trainees and retention of skills over time.
| S-EPMC9886691 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Electronic health record (EHR) use can enhance or undermine the ability of providers to deliver effective, humanistic patient-centered care. Given patient-centered care has been found to positively impact patient health outcomes, it is critical to provide formal education on patient-centered EHR communication skills. Unfortunately, despite increasing worldwide EHR adoption, few institutions educate trainees on EHR communication best practices.The goal of this research was to develop and deliver mandatory patient-centered EHR training to all incoming housestaff at the University of Chicago.We developed a brief patient-centered EHR use curriculum highlighting best practices based on a literature search. Training was embedded into required EHR onboarding for all incoming housestaff (interns, residents, and fellows) at the University of Chicago in 2015 and was delivered by institutional Clinical Applications Trainers. An 11-item posttraining survey consisting of ten 5-point Likert scale questions and 1 open-ended question was administered. Responses at the high end of the scale were grouped to dichotomize data.All 158 of the incoming 2015 postgraduate trainees participated in training and completed surveys (158/158, 100.0%). Just over half (86/158, 54.4%) were interns and the remaining were residents and fellows (72/158, 45.6%). One-fifth of respondents (32/158, 20.2%) were primary care trainees (defined as internal medicine, pediatric, and medicine-pediatric trainees), and the remaining 79.7% (126/158) were surgical or specialty trainees. Self-perceived pre- versus posttraining knowledge of barriers, best practices, and ability to implement patient-centered EHR skills significantly increased (3.1 vs 3.9, P<.001 for all). Most felt training was effective (90.5%), should be required (86.7%), and would change future practice as a result (70.9%). The only significant difference between intern and resident/fellow responses was prior knowledge of patient-centered EHR use barriers; interns endorsed higher prior knowledge than resident peers (3.27 vs 2.94 respectively, P=.03). Response comparison of specialty or surgical trainees (n=126) to primary care trainees (n=32) showed no significant differences in prior knowledge of barriers (3.09 vs 3.22, P=.50), of best practices (3.08 vs 2.94, P=.37), or prior ability to implement best practices (3.11 vs 2.84, P=.15). Primary care trainees had larger increases posttraining than surgical/specialty peers in knowledge of barriers (0.8 vs 0.7, P=.62), best practices (1.1 vs 0.8, P=.08), and ability to implement best practices (1.1 vs 0.7, P=.07), although none reached statistical significance. Primary care trainees also rated training as more effective (4.34 vs 4.09, P=.03) and felt training should be required (4.34 vs 4.09, P=.10) and would change their future practice as a result (4.13 vs 3.73, P=.02).Embedding EHR communication skills training into required institutional EHR training is a novel and effective way to teach key EHR skills to trainees. Such training may help ground trainees in best practices and contribute to cultivating an institutional culture of humanistic, patient-centered EHR use.
| S-EPMC5773818 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionDevelopment of cardiac disease-related diagnostic skills-including hypothesis-driven data gathering, heart sound interpretation, and ECG interpretation-is an important component of medical student training. Prior studies indicate trainees' performance of these skills is limited. Simulation provides students with opportunities to practice integrating their developing knowledge in a relevant clinical context. We developed a simulated clinic activity for second-year medical students consisting of standardized patient (SP) cases representing cardiovascular (CV) diseases.MethodsStudent small groups rotated through four SP encounters. For each case, one student performed the history, after which the whole small group listened to audio files of heart sounds, interpreted an ECG, and collaboratively developed a prioritized differential diagnosis. The CV course director met with students for a large-group debrief, highlighting key learning points. We collected learners' evaluations of the event through an online survey.ResultsOf students, 276 participated in this activity over the course of 2 years. Nearly all students assessed the activity as extremely or quite effective for applying learning content from the CV course (97%, 2018; 93%, 2019), and for practicing how to approach chest pain, shortness of breath, palpitations, and fatigue (100%, 2018; 95%, 2019). The most helpful aspects were reinforcement of CV disease illness scripts, hypothesis-driven data gathering practice, ECG interpretation, and applying knowledge and skills in a realistic context.DiscussionSP encounters representing CV conditions can effectively provide opportunities for students to integrate basic science knowledge and clinical skills. Students assessed the activity as helpful and engaging.
| S-EPMC7597946 | biostudies-literature