Dataset Information

Identification of complex regional pain syndrome in the upper limb: Skin temperature asymmetry after cold pressor test.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Skin temperature asymmetry (SkTA) may assist in early identification of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), but previous work has been limited by methodological shortcomings including failure to account for the cutaneous nerve distribution where temperature is measured and reliance on laboratory equipment not clinically available. Pilot work suggested that a cold pressor test (CPT) provided a consistent thermoregulatory stress and might increase sensitivity/specificity of SkTA measurements generated reliably by handheld infrared (IR) thermometers.

Aims

This study investigated the sensitivity, specificity, and validity of SkTA in the upper limb to identify CRPS.

Methods

This study was part of a larger clinical trial (the SARA study: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02070367). Using IR thermometers, we evaluated SkTA over major peripheral nerve distributions in the hands before and after immersing a single foot in 5°C water for 30 s. Participant groups included healthy volunteers, CRPS, known nerve injury, and hand fracture.

Results

SkTA was measured in 65 persons, including 17 persons with CRPS (meeting Budapest criteria). Analysis of variance for n = 378 SkTA observations supported diagnosis, CPT, and nerve distribution as significant predictors (P < 0.001) explaining 94% of the variance. Post CPT, sensitivity for a >1.5°C SkTA improved to 82.4% from 58.8%, whereas specificity dropped from 56.3% to 43.8%.

Conclusion

This study adds further support for the accuracy of SkTA as a diagnostic indicator of CRPS. Further precision in estimates will be gained from larger studies, which should also seek to replicate our findings for SkTA in the lower limbs.

SUBMITTER: Packham T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8730613 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background & objectivesPain can be significantly lessened by sex/orgasm, likely due to the release of endorphins during sex, considered potent analgesics. The evidence suggests that endorphins are also present during sexual arousal (that is, prior to sex/orgasm). It follows then that pain can be modulated during sexual arousal, independent of sex/orgasm, too. Accordingly, sexual arousal induced by erotic slides has been demonstrated to lessen pain in men, but not in women. One explanation could be that for women, the erotic slides were not potent enough to elicit a lasting primed state of sexual arousal by the time pain was induced. Thus, the current study aims to optimize the means of inducing a potent state of sexual arousal and subsequently examine the potentially analgesic influence of sexual arousal on pain in women. As a subsidiary aim, the study also assesses whether the anticipated analgesic effect of sexual arousal would be stronger than that of distraction or generalized (non-sexual) arousal.MethodsFemale participants (N = 151) were randomly distributed across four conditions: sexual arousal, generalized arousal, distraction, neutral. Mild pain was induced using a cold pressor while participants were concurrently exposed to film stimuli (pornographic, exciting, distracting, neutral) to induce the targeted emotional states. A visual analogue scale was utilized to measure the subjective level of pain perceived by the participants.ResultsSexual arousal did not reduce subjective pain. Generalized arousal and distraction did not result in stronger analgesic effects than the neutral condition.ConclusionThe present findings do not support the hypothesis that sexual arousal alone modulates subjective pain in women. This might be due to the possibility that genital stimulation and/or orgasm are key in pain reduction, or, that feelings of disgust may inadvertently have been induced by the pornographic stimulus and interfered with sexual arousal in influencing pain.

Project description:Our knowledge about how low-dose (analgesic) morphine affects autonomic cardiovascular regulation is primarily limited to animal experiments. Notably, it is unknown if low-dose morphine affects human autonomic cardiovascular responses during painful stimuli in conscious humans. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that low-dose morphine reduces perceived pain and subsequent sympathetic and cardiovascular responses in humans during an experimental noxious stimulus. Twenty-nine participants (14 females/15 males; 29 ± 6 yr; 26 ± 4 kg·m-2, means ± SD) completed this randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial during two laboratory visits. During each visit, participants completed a cold pressor test (CPT; hand in ∼0.4°C ice bath for 2 min) before and ∼35 min after drug/placebo administration (5 mg iv morphine or saline). We compared pain perception (100 mm visual analog scale), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography; 14 paired recordings), and beat-to-beat blood pressure (BP; photoplethysmography) between trials (at both pre- and postdrug/placebo time points) using paired, two-tailed t tests. Before drug/placebo infusion, perceived pain (P = 0.92), ΔMSNA burst frequency (n = 14, P = 0.21), and Δmean BP (P = 0.39) during the CPT were not different between trials. After the drug/placebo infusion, morphine versus placebo attenuated perceived pain (morphine: 43 ± 20 vs. placebo: 57 ± 24 mm, P < 0.001) and Δmean BP (morphine: 10 ± 7 vs. placebo: 13 ± 8 mmHg, P = 0.003), but not ΔMSNA burst frequency (morphine: 10 ± 11 vs. placebo: 13 ± 11 bursts·min-1, P = 0.12), during the CPT. Reductions in pain perception and Δmean BP were only weakly related (r = 0.34, P = 0.07; postmorphine CPT minus postplacebo CPT). These data provide valuable information regarding how low-dose morphine affects autonomic cardiovascular responses during an experimental painful stimulus.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial, we found that low-dose morphine administration reduced pain perception and blood pressure responses during the cold pressor test via attenuated increases in heart rate and cardiac output. We also determined that muscle sympathetic outflow responses during the cold pressor test seem to be unaffected by low-dose morphine administration. Finally, our exploratory analysis suggests that biological sex does not influence morphine-induced antinociception in healthy adults.