Dataset Information

Does performance at the intercollegiate Membership of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons (MRCS) examination vary according to UK medical school and course type? A retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

The knowledge, skills and behaviours required of new UK medical graduates are the same but how these are achieved differs given medical schools vary in their mission, curricula and pedagogy. Medical school differences seem to influence performance on postgraduate assessments. To date, the relationship between medical schools, course types and performance at the Membership of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons examination (MRCS) has not been investigated. Understanding this relationship is vital to achieving alignment across undergraduate and postgraduate training, learning and assessment values.

Design and participants

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study of UK medical graduates who attempted MRCS Part A (n=9730) and MRCS Part B (n=4645) between 2007 and 2017, using individual-level linked sociodemographic and prior academic attainment data from the UK Medical Education Database.

Methods

We studied MRCS performance across all UK medical schools and examined relationships between potential predictors and MRCS performance using χ² analysis. Multivariate logistic regression models identified independent predictors of MRCS success at first attempt.

Results

MRCS pass rates differed significantly between individual medical schools (p<0.001) but not after adjusting for prior A-Level performance. Candidates from courses other than those described as problem-based learning (PBL) were 53% more likely to pass MRCS Part A (OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.87) and 54% more likely to pass Part B (OR 1.54 (1.05 to 2.25)) at first attempt after adjusting for prior academic performance. Attending a Standard-Entry 5-year medicine programme, having no prior degree and attending a Russell Group university were independent predictors of MRCS success in regression models (p<0.05).

Conclusions

There are significant differences in MRCS performance between medical schools. However, this variation is largely due to individual factors such as academic ability, rather than medical school factors. This study also highlights group level attainment differences that warrant further investigation to ensure equity within medical training.

SUBMITTER: Ellis R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8734024 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEvidence is lacking concerning re-introduction of feed and water following colic surgery.ObjectivesTo describe current approaches of European and American specialists to re-introduction of feed and water in adult horses following surgical treatment of common intestinal lesions, assuming an uncomplicated recovery.Study designCross-sectional survey.MethodsElectronic invitations, with a link to the online survey, were sent to 1,430 large animal specialists, including Diplomates of the ECVS, ACVS, ECEIM and ACVIM colleges.ResultsThe response rate was 12.6% including partial respondent data. Responses for each multiple-choice question were between 123 and 178. Results are expressed as the percentage of the total number of responses and as a range where specific lesions are grouped together. Respondents reported that horses with large intestinal displacements were offered free choice water (63%-65%) within 3 hours (55%-63%), whereas horses with a small intestinal strangulating lesion were offered < 2 L water (64%-74%) 12-24 hours (28%-34%) post-operatively. Horses with a large colon displacement were offered feed within 3 hours of surgery (16%) with the majority offered feed 6-12 hours (35%-36%) post-operatively. Horses with small intestinal strangulating lesions and small colon lesions were offered feed 24-48 hours (34%-42%) after surgery. Following small intestinal, small colon or caecal lesions, horses were re-introduced feed in handfuls (79%-93%) and initially with grass (41%-54%). Horses with large colon displacements were mostly fed handfuls (49%-50%) of forage initially, but a number of respondents would offer larger quantities such as a small bucket (35%-37%) and predominantly of hay (50%-51%).Main limitationsLow response rate. This study did not take into account common post-operative complications that may alter the clinical approach.ConclusionsThis post-operative colic nutrition survey is the first to describe current clinical practice. Further research is required to investigate nutritional strategies in post-operative colic cases.

Project description:ObjectivesInternational medical graduates (IMGs) perform less well in national postgraduate licensing examinations compared with UK graduates, even in computer-marked multiple-choice licensing examinations. We aimed to investigate thought processes of candidates answering multiple- choice questions, considering possible reasons for differential attainment between IMGs and UK graduates.DesignWe employed a semistructured qualitative design using cognitive interviews. Systematic grounded theory was used to analyse data from 'think aloud' interviews of general practitioner specialty trainees (GPSTs) while answering up to 15 live questions from the UK Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners Applied Knowledge Test (AKT).SettingEast Midlands, UK.Participants21 GPSTs including 13IMGs and 8 UK-trained doctors.OutcomesPerceptions of participants on how they answered AKT questions together with strategies used or difficulties experienced.ResultsWe interviewed 21 GPSTs (8 female, 13 male, 13 IMGs, 14 from black and minority ethnic groups, age 24-64 years) in years 1-3 of training between January and April 2017. Four themes were identified. 'Theoretical versus real-life clinical experience': participants reported difficulties recalling information and responding to questions from theoretical learning compared with clinical exposure; rote learning helped some IMGs recall rare disease patterns. Recency, frequency, opportunity and relevance: participants reported greater difficulty answering questions not recently studied, less frequently encountered or perceived as less relevant. Competence versus insight: some participants were over optimistic about their performance despite answering incorrectly. Cultural barriers: for IMGs included differences in undergraduate experience, lack of familiarity with UK guidelines and language barriers which overlapped with the other themes.ConclusionsThe difficulties we identified in candidates when answering AKT questions may be addressed through training. IMGs face additional difficulties which impede examination success due to differences in educational experience, content familiarity and language, which are also potentially amenable to additional training support.