Dataset Information

Use of self-expandable metallic stents for endoscopic biliary decompression decreases stent complications in pancreatic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Both plastic stents and self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSes) are used for endoscopic biliary decompression (BD) among patients with pancreatic cancer (PAC). Cholangitis or stent occlusion often interrupts or ends chemotherapy. We investigated cholangitis, stent occlusion, and chemotherapy interruption rates for SEMSes and plastic stents among patients receiving chemotherapy for PAC.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed data for 293 PAC patients who received a biliary stent at Helsinki University Hospital during 2000-2017. Patients received chemotherapy as palliative treatment (PT: n = 187) or neoadjuvant treatment (NAT: n = 106). Among participants, 229 had a plastic stent (PT: n = 138, NAT: n = 91) and 64 had a SEMS (PT: n = 49, NAT: n = 15).

Results

Overall, 15.6% (n = 10) of patients with SEMSes (PT: 20.4%, n = 10, NAT: 0%) and 53.0% (n = 121) of patients with plastic stents (PT: 69.3%, n = 95, NAT: 28.5%, n = 26) experienced one or more stent complications (p < 0.001). Cholangitis developed in 6.3% (n = 8) of PT patients with SEMSes. No patients with SEMSes receiving NAT (n = 15) experienced cholangitis. However, 31.9% (PT: 42.8%, n = 59, p = 0.001; NAT: 15.4%, n = 14, p = 0.211) of patients with plastic stents developed cholangitis. Among all patients receiving NAT or PT, cholangitis interrupted chemotherapy 6 times (9.4%) in SEMS patients and 61 times (26.6%) in plastic stent patients (p = 0.004). Stent occlusion without cholangitis interrupted NAT or PT 2 times (2.1%) in SEMS patients and 31 times (13.5%) in plastic stent patients (p = 0.023).

Conclusions

SEMS is recommended for BD among patients with PAC receiving chemotherapy. Among both PT and NAT patients, patients with SEMS experience a lower stent failure rate, lower rate of cholangitis, and fewer chemotherapy interruptions than patients with plastic stents.

SUBMITTER: Vehvilainen S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8741707 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe occurrence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) after using covered self-expandable metallic stents (CSEMS) and multiple plastic stents (MPS) in the therapy of benign biliary strictures (BBS) remains ambiguous, this analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes.MethodsA systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) was conducted for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and the included studies were published between 2008 and 2021. The primary outcome was PEP, while the secondary outcomes were stricture resolution, recurrence, overall adverse events, costs, and ERCP sessions. Pooled effect sizes were calculated with the random-effects model or fixed-effects model depending on the heterogeneity.ResultsSix RCTs contained 444 patients (221 with CSEMS, 223 with MPS) finally included in the meta-analysis. The present analysis shows that compared to MPS, PEP is more likely to occur in CSEMS (OR [odds ratio] = 3.34, 95% confidence intervals [CI]:1.44-7.77, p = .005). CSEMS needs fewer ERCP sessions (Mean Deviation [MD]: -1.56; 95%CI:-2.66, -0.46], p = .006). The difference in stricture resolution and recurrence was not significant between the two stent types (OR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.49-1.56, p = .64; and OR = 2.3, 95%CI: 0.68-7.76, p = .18). The incidence of overall adverse events was comparable between CSEMS and the MPS group (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.97-2.29, p = .07).ConclusionsCompared with MPS, CSEMS caused a significantly higher incidence of PEP but fewer ERCP procedures, while the rate of stricture resolution, recurrence, and overall adverse events were comparable. Prevention methods of PEP should be further evaluated in BBS when undergoing CSEMS placement.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42022314864. Key messagesCSEMS and MPS placement remain a mainstay for patients with BBS, and severe complications after stent placement have not been compared.The incidence of PEP was higher after deployment of CSEMS compared to MPS.Prevention methods of PEP should be evaluated in BBS when undergoing CSEMS placement.

Project description:Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have been widely used in the treatment of malignant central airway obstruction. However, few reports focus on the treatment of atelectasis and how to estimate the prior probability of success via SEMSs placement, This current study aimed to study the safety and effectiveness of SEMSs for the treatment of obstructive atelectasis, and the value of preoperative CT enhancement for ventilation of atelectasis via SEMSs placement. A total of 35 patients with obstructive atelectasis (29 male and 6 female) was included from February 2012 to March 2018. The procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance, and bronchoscopic laser resection was performed for severe restenosis cases after SEMSs placement. Clinical and functional pulmonary data were recorded before and 3 months after the procedure. Follow-up involved clinical data and radiographic techniques at 48?h and at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month intervals. Thirty-eight SEMSs were successfully implanted in 34 patients, included 29 Y type tracheal stents, 4 small y stents, and 5 straight airway stents. After stenting, 26 cases showed full ventilation, and 3 cases were partially ventilated. The technical success and clinical success was 97.1% and 82.9%, respectively. A higher maximum enhancement CT value was found in patients with full ventilation. Mean follow-up time was 18.8 ± 4.0 months. Eight cases showed restenosis and received endoscopic laser resection, included 1 case underwent removal and 3 cases received second stenting. There were 2 cases of perioperative non-operative death, and 11 cases of post-discharge death (2 cardiac deaths and 9 malignant tumors). The survival rates of 3 months, 1 year and 2 years were 78.6%, 58.5% and 58.5%, respectively. In conclusion, SEMSs placement is safe and effective for obstructive atelectasis, and the preoperative CT enhancement played an important role in estimating the prior probability of success in the treatment of atelectasis via SEMSs placement.