Dataset Information

Proteomic profiling reveals a distinctive molecular signature for critically ill COVID-19 patients compared with asthma and COPD: A distinctive molecular signature for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The mortality rate for critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases was more than 80%. Nonetheless, research about the effect of common respiratory diseases on critically ill COVID-19 expression and outcomes is scarce.

Design

We performed proteomic analyses on airway mucus obtained by bronchoscopy from severe COVID-19 patients, or induced sputum from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and healthy controls.

Results

Out of the total identified and quantified proteins, 445 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were found in different comparison groups. In comparison to COPD, asthma, and controls, 11 proteins were uniquely present in COVID-19 patients. Apart from DEPs associated with COPD vs controls and asthma vs controls, there were a total of 59 DEPs specific to COVID-19 patients. Finally, the findings revealed that there were 8 overlapping proteins in COVID-19 patients, including C9, FGB, FGG, PRTN3, HBB, HBA1, IGLV3-19, and COTL1. Functional analyses revealed that the majority of them were associated with complement and coagulation cascades, platelet activation, or iron metabolism, and anemia-related pathways.

Conclusions

This study provides fundamental data for identifying COVID-19-specific proteomic changes in comparison to COPD and asthma, which may suggest molecular targets for specialized therapy.

SUBMITTER: Zhang Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8743279 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with high morbidity and mortality rates. This study used proteomic profiling of serum to identify the differentially expressed proteins in COPD patients compared with healthy controls, to expand the knowledge of COPD pathogenesis and to ascertain potential new targets for diagnosis and treatment of COPD.MethodsSerum samples were collected from 56 participants (COPD group n = 28; Healthy Control group n = 28). A data-independent acquisition quantitative proteomics approach was used to identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between the two groups. Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway functional enrichment, and protein-protein interaction analyses of DEPs were conducted to identify their relevant biological processes, cellular components, and related pathways. We used a parallel reaction monitoring (PRM)-based targeted quantitative proteomics approach to validate those findings.ResultsOf 8484 peptides identified by searching the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot knowledgebase, 867 proteins were quantifiable, of which 20 were upregulated and 35 were downregulated in the COPD group. GO functional annotation indicated that the subcellular localization of most DEPs was extracellular. The top three molecular functions of the DEPs were signaling receptor binding, antigen binding, and immunoglobulin receptor binding. The most relevant biological process was immune response. The transforming growth factor-β signaling pathway, Staphylococcus aureus infection, and hematopoietic cell lineage were the top three pathways identified in the KEGG pathway functional enrichment. Our PRM analyses confirmed the identification of 11 DEPs identified in our data-independent acquisition analyses, 8 DEPs were upregulated and 3 DEPs were downregulated.ConclusionThis study using data-independent acquisition analyses with PRM confirmation of findings identified 11 DEPs in the serum of patients with COPD. These DEPs are potential diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers or may be future targets for the treatment of COPD.

Project description:Objective: COVID19 is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus and has been associated with severe inflammation leading to organ dysfunction and mortality. Our aim was to profile the transcriptome in leukocytes from critically ill ICU patients positive for COVID19 vs. those negative for COVID19 to better understand the COVID19 associated host response. Design: Transcriptome profiling of buffy coat cells via ribonucleic acid sequencing (RNAseq) at the time of admission to the ICU. Setting: Tertiary care ICU and academic laboratory. Subjects: All patients admitted to the ICU suspected of being infected with SARS-CoV-2, using standardized hospital screening methodologies, had blood samples collected at the time of admission to the ICU. Interventions: None. Measurement and Main Results: Age- and sex-matched ICU patients that were either COVID19+ (PCR positive, 2 genes) or COVID19- (PCR negative) were enrolled. Cohorts were well-balanced with the exception that COVID19- patients had significantly higher total white blood cell counts and circulating neutrophils and COVID19+ patients were more likely to suffer bilateral pneumonia compared to COVID19- patients. Further, the mortality rate for this cohort of COVID19+ ICU patients was 29%. Transcriptional analysis revealed that when compared to COVID19- patients, the altered transcriptional responses of leukocytes in critically ill COVID19+ ICU patients appeared to be associated with multiple interrelated outcomes, including but not limited to robust interferon (IFN)-associated transcriptional responses, a marked decrease in the transcriptional activity of genes contributing to protein synthesis and the dysregulated expression of genes that contribute to coagulation, platelet activation, Toll-like receptor activation, neurotrophin signaling, and protein SUMOylation/ubiquitination. Conclusions: COVID19+ patients on day 1 of admission to the ICU display a unique leukocyte transcriptional profile that distinguishes them from COVID19- patients. Identification of this profile provides guidance for future targeted studies exploring novel prognostic/therapeutic aspects of COVID19.

Project description:IntroductionCritically ill patients with chronic obstructive respiratory diseases (CORD) who require intensive care unit (ICU) admission are at particular risk for invasive bronchial-pulmonary aspergillosis (IBPA). The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical features for rapid recognition of IBPA in critically ill patients with CORD.MethodsWe included 55 consecutive CORD patients in a respiratory ICU in a prospective, single-center, cohort study. In this study, IBPA combined two entities: ATB and IPA.ResultsThirteen of 55 patients were diagnosed with IBPA. Before ICU admission, three variables were independent predictors of IBPA with statistical significance: more than three kinds of antibiotics used before the ICU admission, accumulated doses of corticosteroids (>350 mg) received before the ICU admission, and APACHE II scores >18 (OR, 1.208; P = 0.022; OR, 8.661; P = 0.038; and OR, 19.488; P = 0.008, respectively). After ICU admission, more IBPA patients had a high fever (>38.5 °C) (46.2% versus 11.9%; P = 0.021), wheeze without exertion (84.6% versus 50.0%; P = 0.027), dry rales (84.6% versus 40.4%; P = 0.005), higher white blood cell counts (21 × 109/L versus 9.4 × 109/L; P = 0.012), lower mean arterial pressures (77.9 mm Hg versus 90.5 mm Hg; P = 0.019), and serum creatinine clearances (36.2 ml/min versus 68.8 ml/min; P < 0.001), and liver-function and coagulation abnormalities. Bronchospasm, sputum ropiness, and plaque formation were more common for IBPA patients during bronchoscopy (66.7% versus 14.3%; P = 0.082; 18% versus 0; P = 0.169; and 73% versus 13%; P = 0.003, respectively). More IBPA patients had nodules and patchiness on chest radiograph on day 1 of admission, which rapidly progressed to consolidation on day 7. IBPA mortality was higher than that of non-IBPA patients (69.2% versus 16.7%; P = 0.001).ConclusionsIBPA may be suspected in critically ill CORD patients with respiratory failure and clinical and bronchoscopic manifestations of severe infection, bronchospasm, and rapid progression of radiologic lesions that are irresponsive to steroids and antibiotics. To avoid misdiagnosis and establish the microbiologic etiology, early bronchoscopy and tight radiologic follow-up should be performed.