Dataset Information

Metabolites of L-ARG in Exhaled Breath Condensate and Serum Are Not Biomarkers of Bronchial Asthma in Children.

ABSTRACT: (1) Background: L-arginine (L-ARG) and its metabolites are involved in some aspects of asthma pathogenesis (airway inflammation, oxidative stress, bronchial responsiveness, collagen deposition). Published data indicate that lungs are a critical organ for the regulation of L-ARG metabolism and that alterations in L-ARG metabolism may be significant for asthma. The aim of this study was to assess the levels of L-ARG and its metabolites in pediatric patients with asthma in serum and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) by mass spectrometric analysis and compare them with non-asthmatic children. (2) Methods: Sixty-five children (37 pediatric patients with bronchial asthma and 28 healthy control subjects) aged 6-17 participated in the study. All participants underwent a clinical visit, lung tests, allergy tests with common aeroallergens, and serum and EBC collection. The levels of biomarkers were determined in both serum and EBC. Analytical chromatography was conducted using an Acquity UPLC system equipped with a cooled autosampler and an Acquity HSS T3 column. Mass spectrometric analysis was conducted using the Xevo G2 QTOF MS with electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive ion mode. (3) Results: Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) levels in serum and EBC did not differ significantly in asthmatic children and healthy control subjects. We found no correlation between forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and L-ARG and its metabolites, as well as between interleukin-4 (IL-4) serum level and L-ARG and its metabolites. Concentrations of ADMA, SDMA, citrulline (CIT), and ornithine (ORN) were higher in serum than EBC in asthmatics and non-asthmatics. By contrast, concentrations of dimethylarginine (DMA) were higher in EBC than serum. ADMA/L-ARG, SDMA/L-ARG, and DMA/L-ARG ratios were significantly higher in EBC than in serum in asthmatics and in non-asthmatics. (4) Conclusions: Serum and EBC concentrations of L-ARG and its metabolites were not an indicator of pediatric bronchial asthma in our study.

SUBMITTER: Polomska J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8746037 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundResearchers investigating lung diseases, such as asthma, have questioned whether certain compounds previously reported in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) originate from saliva contamination. Moreover, despite its increasing use in 'omics profiling studies, the constituents of EBC remain largely uncharacterized. The present study aims to define the usefulness of EBC in investigating lung disease by comparing EBC, saliva, and saliva-contaminated EBC using targeted and untargeted mass spectrometry and the potential of metabolite loss from adsorption to EBC sample collection tubes.MethodsLiquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to analyze samples from 133 individuals from three different cohorts. Levels of amino acids and eicosanoids, two classes of molecules previously reported in EBC and saliva, were measured using targeted LC-MS. Cohort 1 was used to examine contamination of EBC by saliva. Samples from Cohort 1 consisted of clean EBC, saliva-contaminated EBC, and clean saliva from 13 healthy volunteers; samples were analyzed using untargeted LC-MS. Cohort 2 was used to compare eicosanoid levels from matched EBC and saliva collected from 107 asthmatic subjects. Samples were analyzed using both targeted and untargeted LC-MS. Cohort 3 samples consisted of clean-EBC collected from 13 subjects, including smokers and non-smokers, and were used to independently confirm findings; samples were analyzed using targeted LC-MS, untargeted LC-MS, and proteomics. In addition to human samples, an in-house developed nebulizing system was used to determine the potential for EBC samples to be contaminated by saliva.ResultsOut of the 400 metabolites detected in both EBC and saliva, 77 were specific to EBC; however, EBC samples were concentrated 20-fold to achieve this level of sensitivity. Amino acid concentrations ranged from 196 pg/mL - 4 μg/mL (clean EBC), 1.98 ng/mL - 6 μg/mL (saliva-contaminated EBC), and 13.84 ng/mL - 1256 mg/mL (saliva). Eicosanoid concentration ranges were an order of magnitude lower; 10 pg/mL - 76.5 ng/mL (clean EBC), 10 pg/mL - 898 ng/mL (saliva-contaminated EBC), and 2.54 ng/mL - 272.9 mg/mL (saliva). Although the sample size of the replication cohort (Cohort 3) did not allow for statistical comparisons, two proteins and 19 eicosanoids were detected in smoker vs. non-smoker clean-EBC.ConclusionsWe conclude that metabolites are present and detectable in EBC using LC-MS; however, a large starting volume of sample is required.

Project description:The lung microbiota is commonly sampled using relatively invasive bronchoscopic procedures. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection potentially offers a less invasive alternative for lung microbiota sampling. We compared lung microbiota samples retrieved by protected specimen brushings (PSB) and exhaled breath condensate collection. We also sought to assess whether aerosolized antibiotic treatment would influence the lung microbiota and whether this change could be detected in EBC. EBC was collected from 6 conscious sheep and then from the same anesthetized sheep during mechanical ventilation. Following the latter EBC collection, PSB samples were collected from separate sites within each sheep lung. On the subsequent day, each sheep was then treated with nebulized colistimethate sodium. Two days after nebulization, EBC and PSB samples were again collected. Bacterial DNA was quantified using 16S rRNA gene quantitative PCR. The V2-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR and sequenced using Illumina MiSeq. Quality control and operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering were performed with mothur. The EBC samples contained significantly less bacterial DNA than the PSB samples. The EBC samples from anesthetized animals clustered separately by their bacterial community compositions in comparison to the PSB samples, and 37 bacterial OTUs were identified as differentially abundant between the two sample types. Despite only low concentrations of colistin being detected in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, PSB samples were found to differ by their bacterial compositions before and after colistimethate sodium treatment. Our findings indicate that microbiota in EBC samples and PSB samples are not equivalent.IMPORTANCE Sampling of the lung microbiota usually necessitates performing bronchoscopic procedures that involve a hospital visit for human participants and the use of trained staff. The inconvenience and perceived discomfort of participating in this kind of research may deter healthy volunteers and may not be a safe option for patients with advanced lung disease. This study set out to evaluate a less invasive method for collecting lung microbiota samples by comparing samples taken via protected specimen brushings (PSB) to those taken via exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection. We found that there was less bacterial DNA in EBC samples compared with that in PSB samples and that there were differences between the bacterial communities in the two sample types. We conclude that while EBC and PSB samples do not produce equivalent microbiota samples, the study of the EBC microbiota may still be of interest.

Dataset Information

Metabolites of L-ARG in Exhaled Breath Condensate and Serum Are Not Biomarkers of Bronchial Asthma in Children.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets