Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Quantitative comparison of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test and antigen testing algorithms: a decision analysis simulation model.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 offer advantages over nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs, such as RT-PCR), including lower cost and rapid return of results, but show reduced sensitivity. Public health organizations recommend different strategies for utilizing NAATs and antigen tests. We sought to create a framework for the quantitative comparison of these recommended strategies based on their expected performance.

Methods

We utilized a decision analysis approach to simulate the expected outcomes of six testing algorithms analogous to strategies recommended by public health organizations. Each algorithm was simulated 50,000 times in a population of 100,000 persons seeking testing. Primary outcomes were number of missed cases, number of false-positive diagnoses, and total test volumes. Outcome medians and 95% uncertainty ranges (URs) were reported.

Results

Algorithms that use NAATs to confirm all negative antigen results minimized missed cases but required high NAAT capacity: 92,200 (95% UR: 91,200-93,200) tests (in addition to 100,000 antigen tests) at 10% prevalence. Selective use of NAATs to confirm antigen results when discordant with symptom status (e.g., symptomatic persons with negative antigen results) resulted in the most efficient use of NAATs, with 25 NAATs (95% UR: 13-57) needed to detect one additional case compared to exclusive use of antigen tests.

Conclusions

No single SARS-CoV-2 testing algorithm is likely to be optimal across settings with different levels of prevalence and for all programmatic priorities. This analysis provides a framework for selecting setting-specific strategies to achieve acceptable balances and trade-offs between programmatic priorities and resource constraints.

SUBMITTER: Salvatore PP 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8756411 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8354301 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6363117 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4075941 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6504979 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5240841 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8538085 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9022615 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7534973 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2994769 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9329426 | biostudies-literature