Hepatic vein resection and reconstruction for liver malignancies: expanding indication and enhancing parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Kawano F
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8759503 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundTo aid in the oncological management of multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), we describe a new surgical procedure, VEssel-Skeletonized PArenchyma-sparing Hepatectomy (VESPAH).Study designOf 152 patients with CRLMs treated with hepatectomy, 33 patients had multiple bilobar liver metastases (≥8 liver metastases); their surgical procedures and clinical outcomes were retrospectively summarized and compared between those who underwent VESPAH and those who underwent major hepatectomy (Major Hx).ResultsOf the 33 patients, 20 patients were resected by VESPAH (the VESPAH group) and 13 patients by major hepatectomy (Major Hx group). The median number of CRLMs was 13 (range, 8-53) in the VESPAH group and 10 (range, 8-41) in the Major Hx group (P=0.511). No operative mortality nor severe morbidity was observed in either group. The VESPAH group showed earlier recovery of remnant liver function after surgery than the Major Hx group; the incidence of grade B/C post hepatectomy liver failure was 5% in the VESPAH group and 38% in the Major Hx group, P=0.048). Intrahepatic tumor recurrence was confirmed in 14 (70%) and 7 (54%) patients in the VESPAH and Major Hx groups, respectively (P=0.416). There was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) after hepatectomy between the two groups; the median OS was 47 months in the VESPAH group and 33 months in the Major Hx group (P=0.481). The VESPAH group showed the higher induction rate of adjuvant chemotherapy within 2 months after surgery (P=0.002) and total number of repeat hepatectomy for intrahepatic recurrence (P=0.060) than the Major Hx group.ConclusionsVESPAH enables us to clear surgical navigation by hepatic vessel skeletonization and may enhance patient tolerability of not only adjuvant chemotherapy but also repeat hepatectomies during the patients' lifetimes.
| S-EPMC8933371 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Backgrounds/aimsMiddle hepatic vein (MHV) is usually preserved as a part of the right or left hepatectomy in order preserve the venous outflow of remnant liver. The aim of this study was to evaluate if resection of MHV could influence post-resection outcomes of standard right or left hepatectomy.MethodsPatients who underwent standard right or left hepatectomy between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Anatomical remnant liver volumes were measured retrospectively using the Hermes workstation (Hermes Medical Solutions AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Uni- and multi-variate analyses were performed to assess the difference in outcomes of those with preservation of MHV and those without preservation.ResultsA total of 144 patients were included. Right hepatectomy was performed for 114 (79.2%) and left hepatectomy was performed for 30 (20.8%) patients. MHV was resected for 13 (9.0%) in addition to the standard right or left hepatectomy. Median remnant liver volume was significantly higher in the MHV resected group (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in serum level of bilirubin, international normalized ratio, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine on postoperative day 1, 3, 5, or 10, ≥ grade IIIa complications (p = 0.44), or 90-day mortality (p = 0.41). On multivariable analysis, resection of the MHV did not influence the incidence of post hepatectomy liver failure (p = 0.52).ConclusionsResection of the MHV at standard right or left hepatectomy did not have a negative impact on postoperative outcomes of patients with adequate remnant liver volume.
| S-EPMC9428431 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Combination therapy using hepatic resection (HR) and intra-operative thermal ablation is a treatment approach for patients with technically unresectable liver malignancies. The aim of this study was to investigate safety, survival and local recurrence rates for patients with technically unresectable liver tumors undergoing HR and separate percutaneous MR-guided thermoablation procedure as an alternative approach. METHODS:Data from all patients with primary or secondary hepatic malignancies treated at a single institution between 2004 and 2018 with combined HR and MR-guided percutaneous thermoablation was collected and retrospectively analyzed. Complications, procedure related information and patient characteristics were collected from institutional records. Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS:A total of 31 patients (age: 62.8?±?9.1?years; 10 female) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n =?7) or hepatic metastases (n =?24) were treated for 98 hepatic tumors. Fifty-six tumors (mean diameter 28.7?±?23.0?mm) were resected. Forty-two tumors (15.1?±?7.6?mm) were treated with MR-guided percutaneous ablation with a technical success rate of 100%. Local recurrence at the ablation site occurred in 7 cases (22.6%); none of these was an isolated local recurrence. Six of 17 patients (35.3%) treated for colorectal liver metastases developed local recurrence. Five patients developed recurrence at the resection site (16.1%). Non-local hepatic recurrence was observed in 18 cases (58.1%) and extrahepatic recurrence in 11 cases (35.5%) during follow-up (43.1?±?26.4?months). Ten patients (32.3%) developed complications after HR requiring pharmacological or interventional treatment. No complication requiring therapy was observed after ablation. Median survival time was 44.0?±?7.5?months with 1-,3-, 5-year overall survival rates of 93.5, 68.7 and 31.9%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 38.7, 19.4 and 9.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION:The combination of HR and MR-guided thermoablation is a safe and effective approach in the treatment of technically unresectable hepatic tumors and can achieve long-term survival.
| S-EPMC7251813 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:In distal pancreatectomy (DP), it is customary to ligate and divide the splenic vein after isolating it from the pancreatic parenchyma. This is considered essential to prevent disruption of the stump of the splenic vein and consequent intra-abdominal haemorrhage in the event of pancreatic fistula (PF). However, this procedure can be technically demanding, especially when the vein is firmly embedded in the pancreatic parenchyma. The objective of the COSMOS-DP trial is to confirm the non-inferiority of resection of the splenic vein embedded in the pancreatic parenchyma compared with the conventional technique of isolating the splenic vein before resection during DP using a mechanical stapler. METHODS:Patients with diseases of the pancreatic body and tail whose pancreatic parenchyma and splenic vein can be divided concurrently during open or laparoscopic DP are considered eligible for inclusion. This study is designed as a multicentre prospective randomised phase III trial. Eligible patients will be centrally randomised to either Arm A (resection of the splenic vein after isolation from the pancreatic parenchyma) or Arm B (co-resection of the vein together with the pancreas). This study aims to establish the non-inferiority of the safety of Arm B compared with that of Arm A; the primary endpoint is the incidence of PF (ISGPF grade B/C). DISCUSSION:The COSMOS-DP trial will establish the safety of this procedure, such that it can be recommended with more confidence. The use of this procedure will likely result in significant reductions in operative time and blood loss during DP. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02871804 . Registered on 27 July 2016.
| S-EPMC6042420 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesA rare and complex procedure, total lung sparing left secondary carinal resection and reconstruction is only performed in a few specialized centers in a restricted group of patients. We reviewed our experience to evaluate its safety.MethodsPatients who underwent left secondary carinal resection and reconstruction with complete lung parenchymal preservation for low-grade bronchial malignancies at the Shanghai Chest Hospital and the Padua University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathologic factors and perioperative outcomes were analyzed.ResultsThirty patients underwent the procedure between July 2012 and July 2019 (mean age, 42.9 years). No operative mortality occurred and postoperative complications developed in 4 patients (13.3%), including pneumonia (n = 3 [10.0%]), subcutaneous emphysema (n = 2 [6.7%]), and prolonged air leak (n = 2 [6.7%]). Pathologies included adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 11), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (n = 6), carcinoid tumors (n = 9 [8 typical and 1 atypical subtypes]), inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (n = 3), and myoepithelioma (n = 1). The margins were positive in 8 patients (26.7%), whereas 2 patients (6.7%) had positive lymph nodes. Adjuvant therapies were performed postoperatively, including chemoradiotherapy for positive lymph nodes and radiotherapy for positive margins.ConclusionsTotal lung sparing left secondary carinal resection and reconstruction can be performed safely in well-selected and oncologically appropriate patients with low-grade bronchial malignancies.
| S-EPMC8350885 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHepatic resection is still associated with significant morbidity. Although the period of parenchymal transection presents a crucial step during the operation, uncertainty persists regarding the optimal technique of transection. It was the aim of the present randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic resection using the technique of stapler hepatectomy compared to the simple clamp-crushing technique.Methods/designThe CRUNSH Trial is a prospective randomized controlled single-center trial with a two-group parallel design. Patients scheduled for elective hepatic resection without extrahepatic resection at the Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg are enrolled into the trial and randomized intraoperatively to hepatic resection by the clamp-crushing technique and stapler hepatectomy, respectively. The primary endpoint is total intraoperative blood loss. A set of general and surgical variables are documented as secondary endpoints. Patients and outcome-assessors are blinded for the treatment intervention.DiscussionThe CRUNSH Trial is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of stapler hepatectomy compared to the clamp-crushing technique for parenchymal transection during elective hepatic resection.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01049607.
| S-EPMC3177759 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It has been reported that parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy (PPH) might lower surgical curability with an increased likelihood of bile duct resection margins (BDRMs). Apparently, PPH is indicated for patients expected to achieve curative resection. The author herein presents a case of a 77-year-old male patient with type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and decreased cardiac function treated with hepatic segments I + IV resection and bile duct resection. During the operation, he underwent two hepatic parenchymal transections matched with right trisectionectomy and left hepatectomy. After removing segments VI and I and extrahepatic bile duct, six hepatic duct openings were exposed at the left and right hila. As some of them were conjoined, two hepaticojejunostomies at the right liver and one hepaticojejunostomy at the left lateral section were performed consecutively. This operation took 7 hours. Eight sessions of intraoperative frozen-section biopsy were performed. All BDRMs were tumor-negative. According to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, the extent of the tumor was pT2bN2M0. It was regarded as stage IVA tumor. The patient recovered uneventfully. He was discharged on the 18th postoperative day. The patient underwent concurrent chemoradiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient has been doing well without tumor recurrence for the past 24 months to date. In conclusion, PPH can lead to curative resection and improved outcomes through reasonable adjustment of the extent of hepatectomy.
| S-EPMC8382862 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Development of the nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) technique has dramatically improved breast reconstruction, and preservation of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) positively influences patient satisfaction. However, women with large, ptotic breasts have historically not been candidates for NAC preservation due to impaired perfusion of the NAC leading to NAC loss. Although reduction mammoplasty has been reported as a strategy to increase candidacy for NSM, success rates and surgical outcomes for this staged approach are not well described in heterogeneous clinical scenarios.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty followed by NSM at our institution between January 2014 and September 2020. Clinical and surgical characteristics were collected. All surgical complications, including NAC loss rates, were analyzed.ResultsForty-one patients (74 breasts) underwent staged NSM during the defined time period. The average time between breast reduction mammoplasty and NSM was 213 days. Overall, 94.6% of NSM resulted in successful nipple preservation. There was no significant difference in the time interval from breast reduction mammoplasty to NSM between patients who had NAC loss (208 days) and those who did not (213 days, P = 0.87). Increasing age was significantly associated with risk of NAC loss (P = 0.002) in our cohort.ConclusionsIn women with breast ptosis (which precludes safe NSM), it is possible to first offer reduction mammoplasty to preserve the NAC for future NSM. Our data suggest that 3 months between staged procedures is a safe time frame.
| S-EPMC9911193 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Surgical resection remains the best choice for the treatment of liver tumors. Hepatectomy combined with artificial vascular reconstruction has been proven as an alternative to treating tumors involving the main hepatic veins. As the cutting-edge surgical technique, robotic liver surgery is a novel procedure expanding the field of minimally invasive approaches, especially in complex reconstruction. This study reports, for the first time, on a robotic hepatectomy with middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft for a patient with hepatic adenoma. The tumor, which was located in segment 8, was adjacent to the MHV. Robot-assisted resection of segment 4 and partial segment 8, and MHV reconstruction using a ePTFE graft were performed. During the post-operative examination and follow-up, the blood flow of the ePTFE graft was patent, and liver function recovered well. Thus, robotic hepatectomy with MHV reconstruction is a safe, minimally invasive, and precise surgery that may provide a novel approach for patients with liver tumors that are invading or adjacent to the main hepatic veins.
| S-EPMC9237532 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOpen pancreatoduodenectomy with vein resection (OPD-VR) is now standard of care in patients who responded to neoadjuvant therapies. Feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) with vein resection (RPD-VR) was shown, but no study provided a detailed description of the technical challenges associated with this formidable operation. Herein, we describe the trips and tricks for technically successful RPD-VR.MethodsThe vascular techniques used in RPD-VR were borrowed from OPD-VR, as well as from our experience with robotic transplantation of both kidney and pancreas. Vein resection was classified into 4 types according to the international study group of pancreatic surgery. Each type of vein resection was described in detail and shown in a video.ResultsBetween October 2008 and November 2021, a total of 783 pancreatoduodenectomies were performed, including 233 OPDs-VR (29.7%). RPD was performed in 256 patients (32.6%), and RPDs-VR in 36 patients (4.5% of all pancreatoduodenectomies; 15.4% of all pancreatoduodenectomies with vein resection; 14.0% of all RPDs). In RPD-VR vein resections were: 4 type 1 (11.1%), 10 type 2 (27.8%), 12 type 3 (33.3%) and 10 type 4 (27.8%). Vascular patches used in type 2 resections were made of peritoneum (n = 8), greater saphenous vein (n = 1), and deceased donor aorta (n = 1). Interposition grafts used in type 4 resections were internal left jugular vein (n = 8), venous graft from deceased donor (n = 1) and spiral saphenous vein graft (n = 1). There was one conversion to open surgery (2.8%). Ninety-day mortality was 8.3%. There was one (2.8%) partial vein thrombosis, treated with heparin infusion.ConclusionsWe have reported 36 technically successful RPDs-VR. We hope that the tips and tricks provided herein can contribute to safer implementation of RPD-VR. Based on our experience, and according to data from the literature, we strongly advise that RPD-VR is performed by expert surgeons at high volume centers.
| S-EPMC10082118 | biostudies-literature