Antibody Responses to Third-Dose mRNA Vaccines in Nursing Home and Assisted Living Residents.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhang A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8760605 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Antibody Responses to Third-Dose mRNA Vaccines in Nursing Home and Assisted Living Residents.
Zhang Ali A Breznik Jessica A JA Clare Rumi R Nazy Ishac I Miller Matthew S MS Bowdish Dawn M E DME Costa Andrew P AP
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 20220115 3
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesWe evaluated the IgG antibody titer against SARS-CoV-2 in 196 residents of a Spanish nursing home after the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine and the evolution of this titer over time. The role of the third dose of the vaccine on immune-response is also analysed in 115 of participants.MethodsVaccine response was evaluated 1, 3 and 6 months after second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and 30 days after booster vaccination. Total anti-RBD (receptor binding domain) IgG immunoglobulins were measured to assess response. Six month after the second dose of vaccine and previously to the booster, T-cell response was also measured in 24 resident with different antibody levels. T-spot Discovery SARS-CoV-2 kit was used to identify cellular immunogenicity.ResultsAs high as 99% of residents demonstrated a positive serological response after second dose. Only two patients showed no serologic response, two men without records of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. A higher immune response was associated with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection regardless of the gender or age. The anti-S IgG titers decreased significantly in almost all the participants (98.5%) after six months of vaccination whatever previous COVID-infection. The third dose of vaccine increased antibody titers in all patients, although initial vaccination values were not restored in the majority of cases.ConclusionThe main conclusion of the study is that vaccine resulted in good immunogenicity in this vulnerable population. Nevertheless more data are needed on the long-term maintenance of antibody response after booster vaccination.
| S-EPMC9994681 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe sought to compare rates of adverse events among nursing home residents who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster dose with those who had not yet received their booster.MethodsWe assessed a prospective cohort of 11,200 nursing home residents who received a primary COVID-19 mRNA vaccine series at least 6 months prior to September 22, 2021 and received a third "booster dose" between September 22, 2021 and February 2, 2022. Residents lived in 239 nursing homes operated by Genesis HealthCare, spanning 21 U.S. states. We screened electronic health records for 20 serious vaccine-related adverse events that are monitored following receipt of COVID-19 vaccination by the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink. We matched boosted and yet-to-be boosted residents during the same time period, comparing rates of events occurring 14 days after booster administration with those occurring 14 days prior to booster administration. To supplement previously reported background rates of adverse events, we report background rates of medical conditions among nursing home residents during 2020, before COVID-19 vaccines were administered in nursing homes. Events occurring in 2021-2022 were confirmed by physician chart review. We report unadjusted rates of adverse events and used a false discovery rate procedure to adjust for multiplicity of events tested.ResultsNo adverse events were reported during the 14 days post-booster. A few adverse events occurred prior to booster (ischemic stroke: 49.4 per 100,000 residents, 95% CI: 21.2, 115.7; venous thromboembolism: 9.9 per 100,000 residents, 95% CI: 1.7, 56.0), though differences in event rates pre- versus post-booster were not statistically significant (p < 0.05) after adjusting for multiple comparisons. No significant differences were detected between post-booster vaccination rates and prior year 14-day background rates of medical conditions.ConclusionsNo safety signals were detected following a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine booster dose in this large multi-state sample of nursing home residents.
| S-EPMC9115078 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNursing home residents, a frail and old population group, respond poorly to primary mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. A third dose has been shown to boost protection against severe disease and death in this immunosenescent population, but limited data is available on the immune responses it induces.MethodsIn this observational cohort study, peak humoral and cellular immune responses were compared 28 days after the second and third doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in residents and staff members of two Belgian nursing homes. Only individuals without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection at third dose administration were included in the study. In addition, an extended cohort of residents and staff members was tested for immune responses to a third vaccine dose and was monitored for vaccine breakthrough infections in the following six months. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04527614).FindingsAll included residents (n = 85) and staff members (n = 88) were SARS-CoV-2 infection naïve at third dose administration. Historical blood samples from 28 days post second dose were available from 42 residents and 42 staff members. Magnitude and quality of humoral and cellular immune responses were strongly boosted in residents post third compared to post second dose. Increases were less pronounced in staff members than in residents. At 28 days post third dose, differences between residents and staff had become mostly insignificant. Humoral, but not cellular, responses induced by a third dose were predictive of subsequent incidence of vaccine breakthrough infection in the six months following vaccination.InterpretationThese data show that a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine largely closes the gap in humoral and cellular immune response observed after primary vaccination between NH residents and staff members but suggest that further boosting might be needed to achieve optimal protection against variants of concern in this vulnerable population group.
| S-EPMC10040352 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract Background Infection control during COVID‐19 outbreaks in nursing facilities is a critical public health issue. Antibody responses before and after the fourth (second booster) dose of wild‐type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) vaccine in nursing home residents have not been fully characterized. Methods This study included 112 individuals: 54 nursing home residents (mean age: 84.4 years; 35 SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive and 19 previously infected) and 58 healthcare workers (mean age: 47.7 years; 25 SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive and 33 previously infected). Antispike and antinucleocapsid antibody responses to messenger RNA vaccination were evaluated using serum samples collected shortly and 5 months after the third dose, and shortly after the fourth dose. Results The median immunoglobulin G (IgG) level in SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive residents was similar to that in SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive healthcare workers after the fourth dose (24,026.3 vs. 30,328.6 AU/mL, p = .79), whereas after the third dose the IgG level of SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive residents was approximately twofold lower than that in SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive healthcare workers. In residents with previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, timing of infection in relation to vaccination affected the kinetics of antibody responses. Residents infected after the third dose showed the highest IgG levels after the fourth dose among all groups (median: 64,328.8 AU/mL), in contrast to residents infected before initiating vaccination with antibody levels similar to those of SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive residents. Conclusions Advanced aged nursing home residents, poor responders in the initial SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine series, could achieve sufficient antibody responses after the fourth (second booster) vaccination, comparable to those of younger adults. Antibody responses before and after the fourth (second booster) dose of wild‐type SARS‐CoV‐2 mRNA vaccine in nursing home residents. The median IgG level after the fourth dose in SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive residents was similar to that in SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive healthcare workers. The IgG ratio of SARS‐CoV‐2‐naive residents to healthcare workers increased from 0.5 (50%) after the third dose to 0.8 (80%) after the fourth dose.
| S-EPMC10461422 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented the National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care in Nursing Homes (the Partnership) to decrease antipsychotic use and improve care for nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. We determined whether the extent of antipsychotic and other psychotropic medication prescribing in AL residents with dementia mirrored that of long-stay NH (LSNH) residents after the Partnership.MethodsUsing a 20% sample of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with Part D, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including AL and LSNH residents with dementia. The monthly prevalence of psychotropic medication prescribing (antipsychotics, antidepressants, anxiolytics/sedative-hypnotics, anticonvulsants/mood stabilizers, benzodiazepines, and antidementia medications) was examined. We used an interrupted time-series analysis to compare medication prescribing before (July 1, 2010-March 31, 2012) and after (April 1, 2012-December 31, 2017) the Partnership in both settings.ResultsWe identified 107,931 beneficiaries with ≥1 month as an AL resident and 323,766 beneficiaries with ≥1 month as a LSNH resident with dementia, including 1,923,867 person-months and 4,984,405 person-months, respectively. Antipsychotic prescribing declined over the study period in both settings. After the launch of the Partnership, the rate of decline in antipsychotic prescribing slowed in AL residents with dementia (slope change = 0.03 [95% CLs: 0.02, 0.04]) while the rate of decline in antipsychotic prescribing increased in LSNH residents with dementia (slope change = -0.12 [95% CLs: -0.16, -0.08]). Antidepressants were the most prevalent medication prescribed, anticonvulsant/mood stabilizer prescribing increased, and anxiolytic/sedative-hypnotic and antidementia medication prescribing declined.ConclusionsThe federal Partnership to reduce antipsychotic prescribing in NH residents did not appear to affect antipsychotic prescribing in AL residents with dementia. Given the increase in the prescribing of mood stabilizers/anticonvulsants that occurred after the launch of the Partnership, monitoring may be warranted for all psychotropic medications in AL and NH settings.
| S-EPMC9771901 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundInfection control during COVID-19 outbreaks in nursing facilities is a critical public health issue. Antibody responses before and after the third (booster) dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in nursing home residents have not been fully characterized.MethodsThis study included 117 individuals: 54 nursing home residents (mean age, 83.8 years; 39 SARS-CoV-2-naive and 15 previously infected) and 63 healthcare workers (mean age, 45.8 years; 32 SARS-CoV-2-naive and 31 previously infected). Anti-spike (receptor-binding domain [RBD]) and anti-nucleocapsid antibody responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination and their related factors were evaluated using pre- (shortly and 6 months after the second dose) and post-booster vaccination samples.ResultsThe median anti-spike (RBD) IgG level in SARS-CoV-2-naive residents 6 months after the second dose was the lowest among the four groups, with a decreasing rate of over 90%. The median rate of increase before and after the third dose in SARS-CoV-2-naive residents was significantly higher than that in SARS-CoV-2-naive healthcare workers (64.1- vs. 37.0-fold, P = 0.003), with the highest level among the groups. The IgG ratio of SARS-CoV-2-naive residents to healthcare workers after the second and third doses changed from one-fifth (20%) to one-half (50%). The rate of increase after the third dose in previously infected individuals was three- to fourfold, regardless of residents or healthcare workers.ConclusionsAdvanced aged nursing home residents, poor responders in the initial SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series, could obtain sufficient antibody responses with the additional booster dose, despite more than 6 months after the second.
| S-EPMC9530588 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDuration of post-vaccination protection against COVID-19 in nursing home (NH) residents is a critical issue. The objective of this study was to estimate the duration of the IgG(S) response to the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in NH residents with (COV-Yes) or without (COV-No) history of SARS-CoV-2 infection.MethodsA 574 COV-Yes and COV-No NH residents were included in 2 cohorts: Main (n = 115, median age 87 years) or Confirmatory (n = 459, median age 89 years). IgG(S) quantification was carried out at three different time points following the BNT162b2 vaccine: three (1st) and seven (2nd) months after the 2nd dose, and 1 month after the 3rd dose (3rd quantification) in the Main cohort, and twice (2nd and 3rd) in the Confirmatory cohort. The seroneutralization capacity according to COVID-19 history was also measured in a subgroup of patients.ResultsNeutralization capacity was strongly correlated with IgG(S) levels (R2 :76%) without any difference between COV-Yes and COV-No groups for the same levels of IgG(S). After the 2nd dose, duration of the assumed robust protection (IgG(S) >264 BAU/ml) was two-fold higher in the COV-Yes vs. COV-No group: 12.60 (10.69-14.44) versus 5.76 (3.91-8.64) months, with this advantage mainly due to the higher IgG(S) titers after the 2nd dose and secondary to a slower decay over time. After the 3rd dose, duration of robust protection was estimated at 11.87 (9.88-14.87) (COV-Yes) and 8.95 (6.85-11.04) (COV-No) months. These results were similar in both cohorts.Conclusions and relevanceIn old subjects living in NH, history of SARS-CoV-2 infection provides a clear advantage in the magnitude and duration of high IgG(S) titers following the 2nd dose. Importantly, the 3rd dose induces a much more pronounced IgG(S) response than the 2nd dose in COV-No subjects, the effect of which should be able to ensure a prolonged protection against severe forms of COVID-19 in these subjects.
| S-EPMC9115082 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of market-level changes in assisted living supply on nursing home utilization and resident acuity.Data sourcesPrimary data on the supply of assisted living over time were collected from 13 states from 1993 through 2007 and merged with nursing home-level data from the Online Survey Certification and Reporting System and market-level information from the Area Resource File.Study designLeast squares regression specification incorporating market and time-fixed effects.Principal findingsA 10 percent increase in assisted living capacity led to a 1.4 percent decline in private-pay nursing home occupancy and a 0.2-0.6 percent increase in patient acuity.ConclusionsAssisted living serves as a potential substitute for nursing home care for some healthier individuals with greater financial resources, suggesting implications for policy makers, providers, and consumers.
| S-EPMC3523376 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8527596 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Dementia contributes to the development of pressure injuries (PrIs).PurposeThis study describes the real-time body positions of 2 nursing home (NH) residents, residing in the United States and living with dementia, to inform development of PrI prevention strategies tailored to individual risk profiles.MethodsAs part of a larger study, eligible residents were fitted with a triaxial accelerometer sensor placed on the anterior chest to monitor body positions 24-hours daily through a 4-week monitoring period. The current study used an observational, prospective design during routine repositioning events for 2 residents. A convenience sample of 2 residents from a single NH wing who were considered moderately at risk for PrI development (Braden Scale score 13-14) with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score in the severely impaired range were selected based on nursing staff recommendation.ResultsSensor data showed that both residents, although "chairfast" according to the Braden Scale, spent <5% in an upright position and the great majority of time reclining at an angle <50%. One (1) resident demonstrated a persistent side preference.ConclusionsWearable sensors are not a long-term solution for protecting those with dementia from PrI formation but do provide a crude picture of overall body positions throughout the 24-hour day that may inform individualized PrI prevention strategies. Studies including large samples of NH residents living with dementia are warranted.
| S-EPMC10507611 | biostudies-literature