Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Clinician Decisions After Notification of Elevated Blood Pressure Measurements From Patients in a Remote Monitoring Program.


ABSTRACT:

Importance

Guidelines recommend using telehealth for hypertension management, but insufficient evidence is available to guide strategies for incorporating telehealth data into clinical practice.

Objective

To describe how primary care teams responded to elevated remote blood pressure (BP) alerts in the electronic health record (EHR) in a randomized clinical trial of BP telemonitoring conducted in routine practice settings.

Design, setting, and participants

This retrospective cohort study reviewed EHR documentation from May 8, 2018, to August 9, 2019, in a single urban academic family practice site. Primary care teams comprising 28 attending physicians and nurse practitioners, residents, and nurses cared for 162 patients in a text-based clinical trial of remote BP monitoring remote BP monitoring. Data were analyzed from October 21, 2019, to April 30, 2021.

Exposures

Clinicians received a direct message in their EHR inbox when patients submitted at least 3 elevated BP readings.

Main outcomes and measures

Categories and frequencies of clinician action, created via review of EHR-documented clinician responses to EHR alerts by 2 physicians.

Results

Patients in this study (n = 162) were predominantly female (111 [68.5%]) and Black or African American (146 [90.1%]), whereas attending physicians (n = 21) were predominantly female (13 [61.9%]) and non-Hispanic White (19 [90.5%]) with a mean (SD) age of 51.6 (11.1) years. Five hundred fifty-two alerts fell into 12 categories of clinical actions. Clinicians acted on 343 alerts (62.1%). Common remote activities were to reconcile medications and assess adherence (120 of 552 alerts [21.7%]) and verify BP measurement technique (65 of 552 alerts [11.8%]). Clinicians also commonly requested appointments (120 of 552 alerts [21.7%]) and/or saw the patient in a subsequent office visit (114 of 552 alerts [20.7%]). Ninety-six alerts (17.4%) resulted in medication changes; half of these changes were remote (48 of 96 [50.0%]), and the other half were visit-based. For 209 of 552 alerts (37.9%), no changes were made to the care plan, typically without documenting clinical rationale (196 of 209 instances [93.8%]). Exploratory EHR review was used to infer potential clinical rationale for 106 (54.1%) of such cases, but there was insufficient information for the remaining 90 (45.9%).

Conclusions and relevance

These findings suggest that EHR alerts for elevated BP during remote monitoring were effective in prompting a mix of remote and office-based management. It was also common for the plan of care to remain unchanged, possibly suggesting need for more refined alerts and improved clinician support.

SUBMITTER: Lee NS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8760617 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10439484 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7746494 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11304113 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10111523 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7896378 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8087548 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8031313 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7065804 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7429032 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8947665 | biostudies-literature