Dataset Information

Comparative Bioavailability Study of a New Vitamin D3 Orodispersible Film Versus a Marketed Oral Solution in Healthy Volunteers.

ABSTRACT:

Background and objective

An orally disintegrating film (ODF) formulation of vitamin D3 that dissolves rapidly in the mouth without drinking or chewing may be a worthwhile alternative to currently available drug products for therapeutic vitamin D supplementation. This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of a single dose of a vitamin D3 25000 I.U. ODF with those of a marketed oral vitamin D3 preparation in healthy subjects.

Methods

This Phase 1, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study compared the pharmacokinetics of calcifediol [25(OH)D3], the precursor of bioactive vitamin D3, after a single dose of a new vitamin D3 25,000 I.U. ODF with those of a Reference formulation (vitamin D3 25000 I.U./2.5 mL oral solution) in healthy adult subjects using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay. The primary objective was bioavailability under fed conditions, defined as maximum plasma concentration (C_max) of 25(OH)D3 and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0-t). The pharmacokinetics of 25(OH)D3 were also evaluated following the ODF administration under fasting conditions. Subjects were randomised to receive a single dose of the vitamin D3 25000 I.U. ODF or the Reference oral solution under fed conditions or the vitamin D3 ODF under fasting conditions.

Results

Forty-eight healthy subjects were randomised and completed the study. Overall, the pharmacokinetic profile was very similar across the three treatment groups, and bioavailability did not significantly differ among treatments. Under fed conditions, mean 25(OH)D3 plasma values for C_max were 6.68 ± 2.03 versus 6.61 ± 2.62 ng/mL for the Test versus Reference formulations. Corresponding values for AUC_0-t were 2364.80 ± 1336.97 versus 2150.52 ± 1622.76 ng/mL × h. Mean C_max was slightly lower (6.68 ± 2.03 vs 7.23 ± 1.48 ng/mL) and the time to reach peak concentration was delayed (144 h [36-312] versus 42 h (2-480]) with the ODF under fed versus fasting conditions (p = 0.0371). The point estimates and 90 % CIs of the Test_fed/Reference_fed ratios of the geometric means showed that the bioavailability of exogenous 25(OH)D3 was, both in rate and extent of absorption, slightly higher with the vitamin D3 ODF than the vitamin D3 oral solution under the administration conditions recommended for the vitamin D3 oral solution. Palatability and ease of use of the ODF were satisfactory.

Conclusion

The new ODF 25000 I.U. formulation provided a valuable alternative to the marketed oral solution for therapeutic vitamin D supplementation, with a bioavailability that was slightly higher than that of the vitamin D3 oral solution administered under the same conditions.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered with the ISRCTN Registry (Registry code: ISRCTN13208948) on 27 November 2020.

SUBMITTER: Radicioni M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8761109 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Dronabinol is a pharmaceutical tetrahydrocannabinol originally developed as an oral capsule. A dronabinol oral solution was recently approved, and the effects of food on absorption and bioavailability of the oral solution versus capsules were compared in an open-label, single-dose, 3-period crossover study. Healthy volunteers were randomized to either dronabinol oral solution 4.25 mg (fed) or dronabinol capsule 5 mg (fed or fasted). Dosing was separated by a 7-day washout period. Plasma pharmacokinetics were evaluated for dronabinol and its major metabolite, 11-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (11-OH-?9-THC). Pharmacokinetic data were available for analysis in 54 volunteers. In the fed state, initial dronabinol absorption was faster with oral solution versus capsule (mean time to the first measurable concentration, 0.15 vs 2.02 hours, respectively), with 100% and 15% of volunteers, respectively, having detectable plasma dronabinol levels 30 minutes postdose. There was less interindividual variability in plasma dronabinol concentration during early absorption with oral solution versus capsule. Compared with the fasted state, mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t ) increased by 2.1- and 2.4-fold for dronabinol oral solution and capsule, respectively, when taken with food. Mean time to maximum plasma concentration was similarly delayed for dronabinol oral solution with food (7.7 hours) and capsule with food (5.6 hours) versus capsule with fasting (1.7 hours). Under fed conditions, AUC0-t and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity were similar for the oral solution versus capsule based on 11-OH-?9-THC levels. An appreciable food effect was observed for dronabinol oral solution and capsules. Dronabinol oral solution may offer therapeutic benefit to patients, given its rapid and lower interindividual absorption variability versus dronabinol capsule.

Project description:BackgroundVitamin D (Vit D) deficiency (VDD), associated with diverse health conditions, is commonly treated with Vit D3 supplements. However, the gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of Vit D3 in different formulations has not been well studied.ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the absorption of an innovative phospholipids-sucrester matrix biodelivery vehicle-based (sucrosomial®) orodispersible Vit D3 preparation against a reference chewable tablet and soft gel capsule (SGC) Vit D3 formulations in Vit D-deficient healthy adults.MethodsIn study 1, 25 subjects were randomized to receive a weekly single dose of 200,000 IU of sucrosomial® Vit D3 (n = 12) or chewable tablet Vit D3 (n = 13) for 3 weeks. In study 2, 20 subjects were randomized to receive a single dose of 200,000 IU every other week of sucrosomial® Vit D3 (n = 10) or SGC Vit D3 (n = 10) for 6 weeks. Circulatory 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [25(OH)D] levels were reassessed after 2, 3, and 6 weeks in study 1 and after 4 and 6 weeks in study 2.ResultsIn study 1, after 2 weeks, circulatory 25(OH)D levels increased significantly in both Vit D3 treatment groups (p < 0.0001) but improved markedly in the sucrosomial® Vit D3 group, with no further considerable change after 3 and 6 weeks in both groups. Overall, at all three follow-ups, sucrosomial® Vit D3 treatment achieved significantly higher and sustained 25(OH)D levels (p < 0.001). In study 2, after 4 weeks, both Vit D3 treatment groups showed significant improvement in circulatory 25(OH)D levels (p < 0.0001) but substantially higher in the sucrosomial® group with statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups (p = 0.02). At the 6-week follow-up, only subjects in the sucrosomial® Vit D3 group showed a further increase in circulatory 25(OH)D levels (p = 0.049), but no further significant changes in the levels of the SGC Vit D3 group (p = 0.062), showing a statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups (p = 0.002). The Vit D3 treatment was well tolerated by all participants, and no treatment-emergent effects or serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionOur results suggest that the sucrosomial® Vit D3 preparation absorbs efficiently in the GI system, achieving adequately higher and sustained circulatory Vit D levels in VDD, and thus can effectively contribute to the body protection against VDD-associated health conditions.Clinical trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT05706259.