Dataset Information

Metabolomics Analysis on Obesity-Related Obstructive Sleep Apnea After Weight Loss Management: A Preliminary Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery is an effective type of weight loss management and may improve obesity-related obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Obese subjects who meet the criteria for surgery with OSA were enrolled. We investigated the metabolomic effects of RYGB on OSA.

Methods

Clinical data, serum measurements including indices of glycolipid metabolism, and polysomnography (PSG) measurements were collected at baseline and 6 months after RYGB surgery. Metabolomic analysis was performed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Results

A group of 37 patients with obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and suspected OSA were enrolled of which 27 were OSA subjects. After RYGB surgery, metabolic outcomes and sleep parameters were all significantly improved. The OSA remission group had lower valine, isoleucine, and C24:1(cis-15) levels, and higher trimethylamine N-oxide, hippurate, and indole-3-propionic acid levels after RYGB surgery. A combination of preoperative indices (age, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), fasting C-peptide level, and hippurate level) predicted the RYGB effect size in obese patients with T2DM and OSA, with an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.947, specificity of 82.4%, and sensitivity of 100%.

Conclusions

RYGB surgery may significantly improve the metabolic status of patients with obesity, T2DM and OSA. A combination of preoperative indices (age, AHI, fasting C peptide level, and hippurate level) may be useful for predicting the effect size of RYGB in obese patients with T2DM and OSA. The mechanisms underlying OSA remission need to be explored.

SUBMITTER: Huang W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8761762 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea tend to coexist and are associated with inflammation, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and high blood pressure, but their causal relation to these abnormalities is unclear.We randomly assigned 181 patients with obesity, moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, and serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) greater than 1.0 mg per liter to receive treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a weight-loss intervention, or CPAP plus a weight-loss intervention for 24 weeks. We assessed the incremental effect of the combined interventions over each one alone on the CRP level (the primary end point), insulin sensitivity, lipid levels, and blood pressure.Among the 146 participants for whom there were follow-up data, those assigned to weight loss only and those assigned to the combined interventions had reductions in CRP levels, insulin resistance, and serum triglyceride levels. None of these changes were observed in the group receiving CPAP alone. Blood pressure was reduced in all three groups. No significant incremental effect on CRP levels was found for the combined interventions as compared with either weight loss or CPAP alone. Reductions in insulin resistance and serum triglyceride levels were greater in the combined-intervention group than in the group receiving CPAP only, but there were no significant differences in these values between the combined-intervention group and the weight-loss group. In per-protocol analyses, which included 90 participants who met prespecified criteria for adherence, the combined interventions resulted in a larger reduction in systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure than did either CPAP or weight loss alone.In adults with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP combined with a weight-loss intervention did not reduce CRP levels more than either intervention alone. In secondary analyses, weight loss provided an incremental reduction in insulin resistance and serum triglyceride levels when combined with CPAP. In addition, adherence to a regimen of weight loss and CPAP may result in incremental reductions in blood pressure as compared with either intervention alone. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT0371293 .).