A Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer Based on Cancer Incidence-Related DNA Methylation Pattern.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Xiong Z
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8762114 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background: DNA methylation played essential roles in regulating gene expression. The impact of DNA methylation status on the occurrence and development of cancers has been well demonstrated. However, little is known about its prognostic role in breast cancer (BC). Materials: The Illumina Human Methylation450 array (450k array) data of BC was downloaded from the UCSC xena database. Transcriptomic data of BC was downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Firstly, we used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to screen out independent prognostic CpGs, and then we identified methylation-associated prognosis subgroups by consensus clustering. Next, a methylation prognostic model was developed using multivariate Cox analysis and was validated with the Illumina Human Methylation27 array (27k array) dataset of BC. We then screened out differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between methylation high-risk and low-risk groups and constructed a methylation-based gene prognostic signature. Further, we validated the gene signature with three subgroups of the TCGA-BRCA dataset and an external dataset GSE146558 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Results: We established a methylation prognostic signature and a methylation-based gene prognostic signature, and there was a close positive correlation between them. The gene prognostic signature involved six genes: IRF2, KCNJ11, ZDHHC9, LRP11, PCMT1, and TMEM70. We verified their expression in mRNA and protein levels in BC. Both methylation and methylation-based gene prognostic signatures showed good prognostic stratification ability. The AUC values of 3-years, 5-years overall survival (OS) were 0.737, 0.744 in the methylation signature and 0.725, 0.715 in the gene signature, respectively. In the validation groups, high-risk patients were confirmed to have poorer OS. The AUC values of 3 years were 0.757, 0.735, 0.733 in the three subgroups of TCGA dataset and 0.635 in GSE146558 dataset. Conclusion: This study revealed the DNA methylation landscape and established promising methylation and methylation-based gene prognostic signatures that could serve as potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
| S-EPMC8693898 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study intended to determine important genes related to the prognosis and recurrence of breast cancer.MethodsGene expression data of breast cancer patients were downloaded from TCGA database. Breast cancer samples with recurrence and death were defined as poor disease-free survival (DFS) group, while samples without recurrence and survival beyond 5 years were defined as better DFS group. Another gene expression profile dataset (GSE45725) of breast cancer was downloaded as the validation data. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened between better and poor DFS groups, which were then performed function enrichment analysis. The DEGs that were enriched in the GO function and KEGG signaling pathway were selected for cox regression analysis and Logit regression (LR) model analysis. Finally, correlation analysis between LR model classification and survival prognosis was analyzed.ResultsBased on the breast cancer gene expression profile data in TCGA, 540 DEGs were screened between better DFS and poor DFS groups, including 177 downregulated and 363 upregulated DEGs. A total of 283 DEGs were involved in all GO functions and KEGG signaling pathways. Through LR model screening, 10 important feature DEGs were identified and validated, among which, ABCA3, CCL22, FOXJ1, IL1RN, KCNIP3, MAP2K6, and MRPL13, were significantly expressed in both groups in the two data sets. ABCA3, CCL22, FOXJ1, IL1RN, and MAP2K6 were good prognostic factors, while KCNIP3 and MRPL13 were poor prognostic factors.ConclusionABCA3, CCL22, FOXJ1, IL1RN, and MAP2K6 may serve as good prognostic factors, while KCNIP3 and MRPL13 may be poor prognostic factors for the prognosis of breast cancer.
| S-EPMC7519567 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBreast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease resulting in diverse clinical behaviours and therapeutic responses. DNA methylation is a major epigenetic alteration that is commonly perturbed in cancers. The aim of this study is to characterize the relationship between DNA methylation and aberrant gene expression in breast cancer.MethodsWe analysed DNA methylation and gene expression profiles from breast cancer tissue and matched normal tissue in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Genome-wide differential methylation analysis and methylation-gene expression correlation was performed. Gene expression changes were subsequently validated in the METABRIC dataset. The Oncoscore tool was used to identify genes that had previously been associated with cancer in the literature. A subset of genes that had not previously been studied in cancer was chosen for further analysis.ResultsWe identified 368 CpGs that were differentially methylated between tumor and normal breast tissue (∆β > 0.4). Hypermethylated CpGs were overrepresented in tumor tissue and were found predominantly (56%) in upstream promoter regions. Conversely, hypomethylated CpG sites were found primarily in the gene body (66%). Expression analysis revealed that 209 of the differentially-methylated CpGs were located in 169 genes that were differently expressed between normal and breast tumor tissue. Methylation-expression correlations were predominantly negative (70%) for promoter CpG sites and positive (74%) for gene body CpG sites. Among these differentially-methylated and differentially-expressed genes, we identified 7 that had not previously been studied in any form of cancer. Three of these, TDRD10, PRAC2 and TMEM132C, contained CpG sites that showed diagnostic and prognostic value in breast cancer, particularly in estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive samples. A pan-cancer analysis confirmed differential expression of these genes together with diagnostic and prognostic value of their respective CpG sites in multiple cancer types.ConclusionWe have identified 368 DNA methylation changes that characterize breast cancer tumor tissue, of which 209 are associated with genes that are differentially-expressed in the same samples. Novel DNA methylation markers were identified, of which cg12374721 (PRAC2), cg18081940 (TDRD10) and cg04475027 (TMEM132C) show promise as diagnostic and prognostic markers in breast cancer as well as other cancer types.
| S-EPMC6416975 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe exploration and interpretation of DNA methylation-driven genes might contribute to molecular classification, prognostic prediction and therapeutic choice. In this study, we built a prognostic risk model via integrating analysis of the transcriptome and methylation profile for patients with gastric cancer (GC).MethodsThe mRNA expression profiles, DNA methylation profiles and corresponding clinicopathological information of 415 GC patients were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differential expression and correlation analysis were performed to identify DNA methylation-driven genes. The candidate genes were selected by univariate Cox regression analyses followed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. A prognostic risk nomogram model was then built together with clinicopathological parameters.Results5 DNA methylation-driven genes (CXCL3, F5, GNAI1, GAMT and GHR) were identified by integrated analyses and selected to construct the prognostic risk model with clinicopathological parameters. High expression and low DNA hypermethylation of F5, GNAI1, GAMT and GHR, as well as low expression and high DNA hypomethylation of CXCL3 were significantly associated with poor prognosis rates, respectively. The high-risk group showed a significantly shorter prognosis than the low-risk group in the TCGA dataset (HR = 0.212, 95% CI = 0.139-0.322, P = 2e-15). The final nomogram model showed high predictive efficiency and consistency in the training and validation group.ConclusionWe construct and validate a prognostic nomogram model for GC based on five DNA methylation-driven genes with high performance and stability. This nomogram model might be a powerful tool for prognosis evaluation in the clinic and also provided novel insights into the epigenetics in GC.
| S-EPMC7732649 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Calcitriol (1?, 25(OH)(2)-Vitamin D3) binds to the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and regulates differentiation of the normal mammary gland, and may therefore be useful in breast cancer treatment or prevention. Many breast cancer cells are, however, resistant to Calcitriol. In this study, we investigated the resistance mechanism and the role of epigenetic silencing of VDR by promoter hypermethylation. Bisulfite sequencing of the VDR promoter region revealed methylated CpG islands at -700 base pairs (bp) upstream and near the transcription start site. VDR CpG islands were demethylated by 5'deoxy-azacytidine treatment, and this was accompanied by a parallel increase in VDR mRNA levels in breast cancer cell lines. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR analyses confirmed hypermethylation of these CpG islands in primary tumors, and its absence in normal breast tissue. VDR transcripts detected in breast cancers were predominantly 5'-truncated, while normal breast tissue expressed full-length transcripts. Consistent with this observation, genes containing the VDR-responsive element (VDRE), such as cytochrome p450 hydroxylases, p21 or C/EBP were underexpressed in breast cancers compared to normal breast samples. Expression of the active longer transcripts of VDR was restored with 5'deoxy-Azacytidine (AZA) treatment, with a concurrent increase in expression of VDRE-containing genes. Thus, promoter methylation-mediated silencing of expression of the functional variants of VDR may contribute to reduced expression of downstream effectors of the VDR pathway and subsequent Calcitriol insensitivity in breast cancer. These data suggest that pharmacological reversal of VDR methylation may re-establish breast cancer cell susceptibility to differentiation therapy using Calcitriol.
| S-EPMC3087945 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:In patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, differentiating between patients with a low and a high risk of recurrence is an ongoing challenge. In current practice, prognostic clinical parameters are used for risk prediction. DNA methylation markers have been proven to be of additional prognostic value in several cancer types. Numerous prognostic DNA methylation markers for breast cancer have been published in the literature. However, to date, none of these markers are used in clinical practice. METHODS:We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE to assess the number and level of evidence of published DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. To obtain an overview of the reporting quality of the included studies, all were scored according to the REMARK criteria that were established as reporting guidelines for prognostic biomarker studies. RESULTS:A total of 74 studies were identified reporting on 87 different DNA methylation markers. Assessment of the REMARK criteria showed variation in reporting quality of the studies. Eighteen single markers and one marker panel were studied in multiple independent populations. Hypermethylation of the markers RASSF1, BRCA, PITX2, CDH1, RARB, PCDH10 and PGR, and the marker panel GSTP1, RASSF1 and RARB showed a statistically significant correlation with poor disease outcome that was confirmed in at least one other, independent study. CONCLUSION:This systematic review provides an overview on published prognostic DNA methylation markers for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and identifies eight markers that have been independently validated. Analysis of the reporting quality of included studies suggests that future research on this topic would benefit from standardised reporting guidelines.
| S-EPMC6993426 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBreast cancer is an invasive disease with complex molecular mechanisms. Prognosis-related biomarkers are still urgently needed to predict outcomes of breast cancer patients.MethodsOriginal data were download from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The analyses were performed using perl-5.32 and R-x64-4.1.1.ResultsIn this study, 1086 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in the TCGA cohort; 523 shared DEGs were identified in the TCGA and GSE10886 cohorts. Eight subtypes were estimated using non-negative matrix factorization clustering with significant differences seen in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P < 0.01). Univariate Cox analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis were performed to develop a related risk score related to the 17 DEGs; this score separated breast cancer into low- and high-risk groups with significant differences in survival (P < 0.01) and showed powerful effectiveness (TCGA all group: 1-year area under the curve [AUC] = 0.729, 3-year AUC = 0.778, 5-year AUC = 0.781). A nomogram prediction model was constructed using non-negative matrix factorization clustering, the risk score, and clinical characteristics. Our model was confirmed to be related with tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, DEGs in high-risk breast cancer were enriched in histidine metabolism (normalized enrichment score [NES] = 1.49, P < 0.05), protein export (NES = 1.58, P < 0.05), and steroid hormone biosynthesis signaling pathways (NES = 1.56, P < 0.05).ConclusionsWe established a comprehensive model that can predict prognosis and guide treatment.
| S-EPMC8833129 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chemotherapy combined with surgery is effective for patients with breast cancer (BC). However, chemoresistance restricts the effectiveness of BC treatment. Immune microenvironmental changes are of pivotal importance for chemotherapy responses. Thus, we sought to construct and validate an immune prognostic model based on chemosensitivity status in BC. Here, immune-related and chemosensitivity-related genes were obtained from GSE25055. Then, univariate analysis was employed to identify prognostic-related gene pairs from the intersection of the two parts of the genes, and modified least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis was performed to build a prognostic model. Furthermore, we investigated the efficiency of this model from various perspectives, and further validation was performed using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohorts. We identified seven immune and chemosensitivity-related gene pairs and incorporated them into the Cox regression model. After multilevel validation, the risk model was found to be closely related to the survival rate, various clinical characteristics, tumor mutation burden (TMB) score, immune checkpoints, and response to chemotherapeutic drugs. In addition, the model was verified to exhibit predictive capacity as an independent factor over other candidate clinical features. Notably, the constructed nomogram was more accurate than any single factor. Altogether, the risk score model and the nomogram have potential predictive value and may have important practical implications.
| S-EPMC8576363 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAbnormal DNA methylation is well established for breast cancer and contributes to its progression by silencing tumor suppressor genes. DNA methylation profiling platforms might provide an alternative approach to expression microarrays for accurate breast tumor subtyping. We sought to determine whether the distinction of the inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) phenotype from the non-IBC phenotype by transcriptomics could be sustained by methylomics.Methodology/principal findingsWe performed methylation profiling on a cohort of IBC (N?=?19) and non-IBC (N?=?43) samples using the Illumina Infinium Methylation Assay. These results were correlated with gene expression profiles. Methylation values allowed separation of breast tumor samples into high and low methylation groups. This separation was significantly related to DNMT3B mRNA levels. The high methylation group was enriched for breast tumor samples from patients with distant metastasis and poor prognosis, as predicted by the 70-gene prognostic signature. Furthermore, this tumor group tended to be enriched for IBC samples (54% vs. 24%) and samples with a high genomic grade index (67% vs. 38%). A set of 16 CpG loci (14 genes) correctly classified 97% of samples into the low or high methylation group. Differentially methylated genes appeared to be mainly related to focal adhesion, cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions, Wnt signaling pathway, chemokine signaling pathways and metabolic processes. Comparison of IBC with non-IBC led to the identification of only four differentially methylated genes (TJP3, MOGAT2, NTSR2 and AGT). A significant correlation between methylation values and gene expression was shown for 4,981 of 6,605 (75%) genes.Conclusions/significanceA subset of clinical samples of breast cancer was characterized by high methylation levels, which coincided with increased DNMT3B expression. Furthermore, an association was observed with molecular signatures indicative of poor patient prognosis. The results of the current study also suggest that aberrant DNA methylation is not the main force driving the molecular biology of IBC.
| S-EPMC2935385 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genetic and non-genetic factors contribute to breast cancer development. An epigenome-based signature capturing these components in easily accessible samples could identify women at risk. Here, we analyse the DNA methylome in 2,818 cervical, 357 and 227 matched buccal and blood samples respectively, and 42 breast tissue samples from women with and without breast cancer. Utilising cervical liquid-based cytology samples, we develop the DNA methylation-based Women's risk IDentification for Breast Cancer index (WID-BC-index) that identifies women with breast cancer with an AUROC (Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.88) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86) in internal and external validation sets, respectively. CpGs at progesterone receptor binding sites hypomethylated in normal breast tissue of women with breast cancer or in BRCA mutation carriers are also hypomethylated in cervical samples of women with poor prognostic breast cancer. Our data indicate that a systemic epigenetic programming defect is highly prevalent in women who develop breast cancer. Further studies validating the WID-BC-index may enable clinical implementation for monitoring breast cancer risk.
| S-EPMC8807602 | biostudies-literature