Comparison of ETDRS 7-Field to 4-Widefield Digital Imaging in the Evaluation of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Purpose
To compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between two digital fundus imaging protocols for research studies of diabetic retinopathy: the gold standard 7-field (7F) imaging and the more recent 4-widefield (4W) imaging.Methods
Two hundred twenty-two participants enrolled in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study underwent concurrent 7F and 4W imaging. The ETDRS levels from 220 paired gradable images were determined by masked graders. Each image was graded by two independent graders with adjudication by a senior grader, if necessary. Percent agreement between graders and between imaging protocols was evaluated with kappa statistics and weighted kappa statistics.Results
Of 220 gradable eyes, diabetic retinopathy was seen in 11.8%; this was mild in 10.4% and more than mild in 1.4% using 7F imaging. The ETDRS levels showed exact agreement of 95% between 7F and 4W imaging (weighted kappa 0.86). Intergrader agreement for each modality had exact agreement of 89% (weighted kappa of 0.73) for 7F and 91% (weighted kappa 0.77) for 4W.Conclusions
There is substantial agreement in the ETDRS severity level between the 7F and 4W digital imaging protocols, demonstrating that the two imaging protocols are interchangeable. Both 4W and 7F digital imaging protocols can be used for assessing ETDRS levels, even in populations with minimal diabetic retinopathy.Translational relevance
The 4W protocol requires fewer images than the 7F, is more comfortable for the patients, is easier for photographic capture, and provides diabetic retinopathy data that is equivalent to the 7F imaging protocol.
SUBMITTER: Blodi BA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8762689 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:To compare early diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity level and the abilities in detecting early DR lesions among conventional five-field, ultrawide-field (UWF) Optos, and UWF Clarus fundus imaging methods. This was a single-center, prospective, clinic-based, and comparative study. In total, 157 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmological examinations. Following mydriasis, each eye was examined with conventional five-field, UWF Optos, and UWF Clarus fundus imaging methods. The initial UWF images were overlaid with a template mask that obscured the retina, which created a five-field view from UWF images (covered UWF images). The covered UWF images were then graded, after which the template mask was removed, and the original UWF images were also evaluated. All images were graded using the International Clinical DR severity scale. DR grades were compared and analyzed by weighted kappa statistics among the three fundus imaging methods. In total, 157 consecutive patients with diabetes (302 eyes) were enrolled in this study. Weighted kappa statistics for agreement were 0.471 (five-field vs. covered Optos), 0.809 (five-field vs. covered Clarus), 0.396 (covered Optos vs. covered Clarus), 0.463 (five-field vs. Optos), 0.521 (five-field vs. Clarus 133°), 0.500 (five-field vs. Clarus 200°), 0.323 (Optos vs. Clarus 133°), and 0.349 (Optos vs. Clarus 200°). The area under curve of covered Clarus images was higher than that of conventional five-field images at three different thresholds. Compared with conventional five-field and Optos fundus imaging methods, Clarus fundus imaging methods exhibited excellent performance in assessing early DR severity. Thus, Clarus fundus imaging methods were superior for early detection of DR.
| S-EPMC10564714 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo compare Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) severity levels between standard 7-field imaging and ultra-widefield (UWF) imaging and to incorporate peripheral diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions into the ETDRS grading system.DesignCross-sectional Study.ParticipantsPaired images from 192 eyes (189 participants) with diabetic retinopathy were included.MethodsThe ETDRS levels were determined by masked graders in 3 ways: standard 7-field imaging, UWF within the 7-field region (7-field UWF imaging), and the entire UWF image (global ETDRS imaging).Main outcome measuresPercentage agreement between 7-field and UWF imaging for ETDRS levels.ResultsOf the 166 paired images evaluated, exact agreement was found in 48.8% of eyes between standard 7-field and 7-field UWF ETDRS levels with a weighted κ value of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.68). Agreement rates varied with DR severity and were least in early DR (30.8%) and moderate nonproliferative DR (26.5%) groups. In 156 eyes with 7-field UWF ETDRS and global UWF ETDRS levels, exact agreement was found in 143 eyes (92%), with a weighted κ value of 0.9 (95% CI, 0.9-0.98). The peripheral lesions contributed to a higher DR severity in 8% and changed the eye to a proliferative DR level in 2%. Reproducibility of the 3 ETDRS evaluations was comparable with a weighted κ value of 0.57 with standard 7-field imaging, 0.65 with 7-field UWF imaging, and 0.60 with global ETDRS scale imaging.ConclusionsModerate agreement was found in the ETDRS DR severity scale between standard 7-field and UWF imaging, indicating caution in interchanging data from the 2 methods. Both methods showed good reproducibility for clinical trial outcome of 2-step change. The global ETDRS scale provides a comprehensive score to incorporate peripheral changes into the ETDRS scale. The implications of the global scale on progression rate are yet to be determined.
| S-EPMC9562330 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceModerate to substantial agreement between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) 7-field imaging and ultrawide-field (UWF) imaging has been suggested in single-center studies. Comparing images obtained by multiple centers could increase confidence that UWF images can be used reliably in place of ETDRS imaging in future clinical trials.ObjectiveTo compare diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity from modified ETDRS 7-field imaging and UWF imaging.Design, setting, and participantsThis preplanned, cross-sectional analysis included modified ETDRS 7-field images obtained using the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network acquisition protocol and UWF images obtained captured with the Optos 200Tx system (Optos, PLC) from adult participants (≥18 years old) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Both image types were evaluated by trained graders masked to clinical data. Data collection occurred from February 2015 to December 2015, and data analysis from June 2016 to December 2017.Main outcomes and measuresAgreement between UWF images, UWF images masked to include only the ETDRS 7-field area, and ETDRS 7-field images were calculated using κ statistics.ResultsA total of 764 eyes from 385 participants were included; participants had a median (IQR) age of 62.2 (53.6-69.2) years, 194 (50.4%) were women, and 256 (66.5%) were white. Of 742 eyes with both ETDRS 7-field images and UWF masked images graded, 359 (48.4% [95% CI, 44.4%-52.4%]) eyes had exact agreement, and 653 eyes (88.0% [95% CI, 85.2%-90.3%]) agreed within 1 step (weighted κ, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.44-0.58]). After open adjudication by an independent senior grader of all images with more than a 2-step discrepancy, perfect agreement was found in 435 eyes (59.0% [95% CI, 55.1%-62.8%]) and agreement within 1 step in 714 eyes (96.9% [95% CI, 95.1%-98.0%]; κ, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]). Ability of the imaging modalities to detect retinopathy severity in an individual eye was considered similar in 59 eyes (50.9% [95% CI, 41.3%-60.4%]), better for ETDRS 7-field imaging in 22 eyes (19.0% [95% CI, 12.5%-27.7%]), and better for UWF-masked images in 31 eyes (26.7% [95% CI 18.8%-36.5%]). Comparing UWF masked and unmasked images, 94 of 751 eyes (12.5%) had DR graded as at least 1 step more severe on UWF unmasked images vs UWF masked images. Predominantly peripheral DR lesions were present in 308 of 751 eyes (41.0%); this suggested increased DR severity by 2 or more steps in 34 eyes (11.0%).Conclusions and relevanceImaging by the ETDRS 7-field and UWF imaging systems have moderate to substantial agreement when determining the severity of DR within the 7 standard fields. Disparities in an individual eye are equivalently distributed between imaging modalities and can be better or worse on 1 or the other. Longitudinal follow-up will evaluate the primary outcome of this study to determine if peripheral retinal findings are associated with future retinopathy outcomes.
| S-EPMC6439787 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThere is a high and ever-increasing global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and invasive imaging techniques are often required to confirm the presence of proliferative disease. The aim of this study was to explore the images of a rapid and non-invasive technique, widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A), to study differences between patients with severe non-proliferative and proliferative DR (PDR).MethodsWe conducted an observational longitudinal study from November 2022 to March 2023. We recruited 75 patients who were classified into a proliferative group (28 patients) and severe non-proliferative group (47 patients). Classification was done by specialist clinicians who had full access to any multimodal imaging they required to be confident of their diagnosis, including fluorescein angiography. For all patients, we performed single-shot 4 × 4 and 10 × 10 mm (widefield) OCT-A imaging and when possible, the multiple images required for mosaic 17.5 × 17.5 mm (ultra widefield) OCT-A imaging. We assessed the frequency with which proliferative disease was identifiable solely from these OCT-A images and used custom-built MATLAB software to analyze the images and determine computerized metrics such as density and intensity of vessels, foveal avascular zone, and ischemic areas.ResultsOn clinically assessing the OCT-A 10 × 10 fields, we were only able to detect new vessels in 25% of known proliferative images. Using ultra-widefield mosaic images, however, we were able to detect new vessels in 100% of PDR patients. The image analysis metrics of 4 × 4 and 10 × 10 mm images did not show any significant differences between the two clinical groups. For mosaics, however, there were significant differences in the capillary density in patients with PDR compared to severe non-PDR (9.1% ± 1.9 in the PDR group versus 11.0% ± 1.9 for severe group). We also found with mosaics a significant difference in the metrics of ischemic areas; average area of ischemic zones (253,930.1 ± 108,636 for the proliferative group versus 149,104.2 ± 55,101.8 for the severe group.ConclusionsOur study showed a high sensitivity for detecting PDR using only ultra-widefield mosaic OCT-A imaging, compared to multimodal including fluorescein angiography imaging. It also suggests that image analysis of aspects such as ischemia levels may be useful in identifying higher risk groups as a warning sign for future conversion to neovascularization.
| S-EPMC10853160 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The prospective PRIME trial applied real-time, objective imaging biomarkers to determine individualized retreatment needs with intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAI) among eyes with diabetic retinopathy (DR). 40 eyes with nonproliferative or proliferative DR without diabetic macular edema received monthly IAI until a DR severity scale (DRSS) level improvement of ≥2 steps was achieved. Eyes were randomized 1:1 to DRSS- or PLI- guided management. At the final 2-year visit, DRSS level was stable or improved compared to baseline in all eyes, and mean PLI decreased by 11% (p = 0.73) and 23.6% (p = 0.25) in the DRSS- and PLI-guided arms. In both arms, the percent of pro re nata (PRN) visits requiring IAI was significantly higher in year 2 versus 1 (p < 0.0001). The percent of PRN visits receiving IAI during year 1 was significantly correlated with the percent of PRN visits with IAI during year 2 (p < 0.0001). Through week 104, 77.4% of instances of DRSS level worsening in the DRSS-guided arm were preceded by or occurred alongside an increase of PLI. Overall, consistent IAI re-treatment interval requirements were observed longitudinally among individual patients. Additionally, PLI increases appeared to precede DRSS level worsening, highlighting PLI as a valuable biomarker in the management of DR.
| S-EPMC8465170 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity levels assessed from 7 standard-field stereoscopic color photographs on a 35° fundus camera to both Clarus and Optos ultrawidefield color images.DesignCross-sectional, comparative imaging study.ParticipantsParticipants with DR imaged at a single-center retina practice.MethodsParticipants were imaged on 3 cameras at a single visit with the Topcon 35° fundus camera, Clarus, and Optos. The DR Severity Scale (DRSS) level was determined within the 7-field (7F) area of each image set using the ETDRS scale. An additional global DRSS was assigned for both Clarus and Optos images using the entire visible retina. Weighted kappa (wκ) measured the agreement between cameras.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was a 3-way comparison of DRSS level within the 7F area imaged on the 3 cameras. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of the DRSS obtained with standard 7F imaging to the global DRSS of Clarus and Optos and a comparison of the global DRSS between Clarus and Optos only.ResultsNinety-seven eyes (50 participants) were evaluated. Agreement within 1-step of ETDRS levels between standard 7F imaging and Clarus 7F was 90.1% (wκ = 0.65), and with Optos 7F in 85.9%, (wκ = 0.58). Agreement within 1-step between standard 7F imaging and Clarus global was 88.9% of eyes (wκ = 0.63), and Optos global was 85.7%, (wκ = 0.54). Agreement between Clarus and Optos global DR level within 1-step was 89.1% (wκ = 0.68). Intergrader agreement for the 7F ETDRS level was 96% for standard 7F imaging, 98% for Clarus, and 95.5% for Optos.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that when evaluating the 7F area on Clarus and Optos, DR severity grades are comparable to standard 7F imaging. However, it is important to understand the unique attributes and differences of each fundus camera when changing the type of system used in a clinical setting due to upgrading equipment. Additionally, if the facility has access to > 1 device, there should not be an exchange between cameras for the same patient.Financial disclosuresProprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
| S-EPMC10818251 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PURPOSE: Compare wide-field Optomap imaging and optical coherence tomography (OCT) with clinical examination in diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: Patients referred from Diabetic Eye Screening Programmes to three centres underwent dilated ophthalmoscopy and were assigned a DR grade. Wide-field colour imaging and OCT were then examined by the same clinician at that visit and a combined grade was assigned. Independent graders later reviewed the images and assigned an imaging-only grade. These three grades (clinical, combined, and imaging) were compared. The method that detected the highest grade of retinopathy, including neovascularisation, was determined. RESULTS: Two thousand and forty eyes of 1023 patients were assessed. Wide-field imaging compared with clinical examination had a sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 96%, respectively, for detecting proliferative DR, 84% and 69% for sight-threatening DR, and 64% and 90% for diabetic macular oedema. Imaging alone found 35 more eyes with new vessels (19% of eyes with new vessels) and the combined grade found 14 more eyes than clinical examination alone. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of wide-field images and OCT alone detected more eyes with higher grades of DR compared with clinical examination alone or when combined with imaging in a clinical setting. The sensitivity was not higher as the techniques were not the same, with imaging alone being more sensitive. Wide-field imaging with OCT could be used to assess referrals from DR screening to determine management, to enhance the quality of assessment in clinics, and to follow-up patients whose DR is above the screening referral threshold but does not actually require treatment.
| S-EPMC4366475 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposeTo develop a new diabetic retinopathy severity scoring system and to determine if it can monitor changes from baseline as well as identify precise features that have changed over time. Such a grading system could potentially provide an understanding of the impact of treatments utilizing an algorithmic scoring technique.MethodsThe traditional ETDRS grading system was examined and a flow algorithm based on the grading approach was created. All visual comparative assessment points, relying on identification of features in relation to prior standard photographic images, were evaluated and quantified. A new grading form was created that provided fields that captured all relevant features required for determining the ETDRS grading score. A computer software algorithm was developed that examines all entered fields and calculates the appropriate diabetic severity score.ResultsThis diabetic retinopathy scoring algorithm system was successful in generating a severity score comparable to traditional methods of grading images. Validation with traditionally graded images was performed, demonstrating that in a majority of cases, the severity scores were comparable. The algorithmic grading system was then used to analyze images obtained in a large clinical study of diabetic macular edema, resulting in data regarding baseline scoring values, as well as detailed features of the microvasculature that drove the severity scoring results, and changes seen during the trial.ConclusionThis new algorithmic diabetic severity scoring system provides a means to monitor the progression or regression of retinopathy with therapeutic intervention as well as assess the individual microvascular features that may be modified over the course of treatment.
| S-EPMC4671510 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic properties of a nonmydriatic 200° ultra-widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) versus mydriatic Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) 7-field photography for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening.Research design and methodsA consecutive series of 212 eyes of 141 patients with different levels of DR were examined. Grading of DR and clinically significant macular edema (CSME) from mydriatic ETDRS 7-field stereo photography was compared with grading obtained by Optomap Panoramic 200 SLO images. All SLO scans were performed through an undilated pupil, and no additional clinical information was used for evaluation of all images by the two independent, masked, expert graders.ResultsTwenty-two eyes from ETDRS 7-field photography and 12 eyes from Optomap were not gradable by at least one grader because of poor image quality. A total of 144 eyes were analyzed regarding DR level and 155 eyes regarding CSME. For ETDRS 7-field photography, 22 eyes (18 for grader 2) had no or mild DR (ETDRS levels ? 20) and 117 eyes (111 for grader 2) had no CSME. A highly substantial agreement between both Optomap DR and CSME grading and ETDRS 7-field photography existed with ? = 0.79 for DR and 0.73 for CSME for grader 1, and ? = 0.77 (DR) and 0.77 (CSME) for grader 2.ConclusionsDetermination of CSME and grading of DR level from Optomap Panoramic 200 nonmydriatic images show a positive correlation with mydriatic ETDRS 7-field stereo photography. Both techniques are of sufficient quality to assess DR and CSME. Optomap Panoramic 200 images cover a larger retinal area and therefore may offer additional diagnostic properties.
| S-EPMC3507573 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore the spatial patterns of the nonperfusion areas (NPAs) on widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to investigate their associations with NPA progression and DR severity.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 201 eyes from 158 patients with DR. Widefield images were obtained using a swept-source OCTA device (Xephilio OCT-S1), followed by the creation of 20-mm (1614 pixels) en face images. Nonperfusion squares (NPSs) were defined as 10 × 10-pixel squares without retinal vessels. Eyes with high-dimensional spatial data were mapped onto a two-dimensional space using the uniform manifold approximation and projection algorithm and divided by clustering. The patterns of NPA distribution were statistically compared between clusters.ResultsAll eyes were mapped onto a two-dimensional space and divided into six clusters based on the similarity of NPA distribution. Eyes in clusters 1 and 2 had minimal and small NPAs, respectively. Eyes in clusters 3 and 4 exhibited NPAs in the temporal and inferotemporal regions, respectively. Eyes in cluster 5 displayed NPAs in both superonasal and inferonasal areas. The unique NPA distributions in each cluster encouraged us to propose eight possible pathways of NPA progression. DR severity was not equal between clusters (P < 0.001), for example, 8 (15.7%) of 51 eyes and 15 (65.2%) of 23 eyes had PDR in clusters 1 and 5, respectively.ConclusionsDimensionality reduction and subsequent clustering based on the NPA distribution on widefield OCTA enabled the inference of possible NPA progression in DR.
| S-EPMC10584022 | biostudies-literature