Dataset Information

Effect of the Knee and Hip Angles on Knee Extensor Torque: Neural, Architectural, and Mechanical Considerations.

ABSTRACT: This study examined the influence of knee extensors' hip and knee angle on force production capacity and their neuromuscular and architectural consequences. Sixteen healthy men performed sub-maximal and maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) of knee extensors with four different combinations of the knee and hip angles. Muscle architecture, excitation-contraction coupling process, muscular activity, and corticospinal excitability were evaluated on the vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF) muscles. MVIC and evoked peak twitch (Pt) torques of knee extensors increased significantly (p < 0.05) by 42 ± 12% and 47 ± 16% on average, respectively, under knee flexed positions (110° flexion, 0° = full extension) compared to knee extended positions (20° flexion) but were not different between hip positions (i.e., 0° or 60° flexion). Knee flexion also affected VL and RF muscle and fascicle lengths toward greater length than under knee extended position, while pennation angle decreased for both muscles with knee flexion. Pennation angles of the VL muscle were also lower under extended hip positions. Alternatively, no change in maximal muscle activation or corticospinal activity occurred for the VL and RF muscles across the different positions. Altogether these findings evidenced that MVIC torque of knee extensors depended particularly upon peripheral contractile elements, such as VL and RF muscle and fascicle lengths, but was unaffected by central factors (i.e., muscle activation). Furthermore, the hip position can affect the pennation angle of the VL, while VL muscle length can affect the pennation angle of the RF muscle. These elements suggest that the VL and RF muscles exert a mutual influence on their architecture, probably related to the rectus-vastus aponeurosis.

SUBMITTER: Garnier YM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8764280 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used to increase muscle strength and physical function. However, NMES induces rapid fatigue, limiting its application. To date, the effect of quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle length by knee and hip joint manipulation on NMES-induced contraction fatigability is not clear. We aimed to quantify the effects of different muscle lengths on NMES-induced contraction fatigability, fatigue index, and electromyographic (EMG) activity for QF muscle. QF maximum evoked contraction (QMEC) was applied in a 26 min protocol (10 s on; 120 s off; 12 contractions) in 20 healthy participants (24.0 ± 4.6 years old), over 4 sessions on different days to test different conditions. The tested conditions were as follows: supine with knee flexion of 60° (SUP60), seated with knee flexion of 60° (SIT60), supine with knee flexion of 20° (SUP20), and seated with knee flexion of 20° (SIT20). Contraction fatigability (torque decline assessed by maximal voluntary contraction [MVC] and during NMES), fatigue index (percentage reduction in MVC), and EMG activity (root mean square [RMS] and median frequency) of the superficial QF' constituents were assessed. After NMES, all positions except SUP20 had an absolute reduction in MVC (p < .001). Fatigue index was greater in SIT20 than in SIT60 (p < .001) and SUP20 (p = .01). There was significant torque reduction across the 12 QMEC in SUP60 and SIT60, up to 10.5% (p < .001-.005) and 9.49% (p < .001-.033), respectively. There was no torque reduction during NMES in SUP20 and SIT20. Fatigue was accompanied by an increase in RMS (p = .032) and a decrease in median frequency for SUP60 (p < .001). Median frequency increased only in the SUP20 condition (p = .021). We concluded that QF NMES-induced contraction fatigability is greater when the knee is flexed at 60° compared to 20°. In addition, a supine position promotes earlier fatigue for a 60° knee flexion, but it delays fatigue onset for a 20° knee flexion compared to the seated position. These results provide a rationale for lower limb positioning during NMES, which depends on training objectives, e.g., strengthening or task-specific functionality training.

Project description:ContextRunning-related injuries are common in distance runners. Strength training is used for performance enhancement and injury prevention. However, the association between maximal strength and distance-running biomechanics is unclear.ObjectiveTo determine the relationship between maximal knee- and hip-extensor strength and running biomechanics previously associated with injury risk.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingResearch laboratory.Patients or other participantsA total of 36 collegiate distance runners (26 men, 10 women; age = 20.0 ± 1.5 years, height = 1.74 ± 0.09 m, mass = 61.97 ± 8.26 kg).Main outcome measure(s)Strength was assessed using the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) back squat and maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the knee extensors and hip extensors. Three-dimensional running biomechanics were assessed overground at a self-selected speed. Running variables were the peak instantaneous vertical loading rate; peak forward trunk-lean angle; knee-flexion, internal-rotation, and -abduction angles and internal moments; and hip-extension, internal-rotation, and -adduction angles and internal moments. Separate stepwise linear regression models were used to examine the associations between strength and biomechanical outcomes (ΔR2) after accounting for sex, running speed, and foot-strike index.ResultsGreater 1RM back-squat strength was associated with a larger peak knee-flexion angle (ΔR2 = 0.110, ΔP = .045) and smaller peak knee internal-rotation angle (ΔR2 = 0.127, ΔP = .03) and internal-rotation moment (ΔR2 = 0.129, ΔP = .03) after accounting for sex, speed, and foot-strike index. No associations were found between 1RM back-squat strength and vertical loading rate, trunk lean, or hip kinematics and kinetics. Hip- and knee-extensor maximal voluntary isometric contractions were also not associated with any biomechanical variables.ConclusionsGreater 1RM back-squat strength was weakly associated with a larger peak knee-flexion angle and smaller knee internal-rotation angle and moment in collegiate distance runners. Runners who are weaker in the back-squat exercise may exhibit running biomechanics associated with the development of knee-related injuries.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate clinical and biomechanical outcomes after knee extensor mechanism reconstruction (KEMR).MethodsPatients who underwent KEMR at our institution from 2011 to 2018 were identified. Patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner Activity Scale) were compiled at clinical follow-up. Isokinetic testing was conducted using the BioDex system 4 pro dynamometer at slow (60°/s), intermediate (180°/s), and fast (300°/s) speeds in a 9-patient subset.ResultsFrom 2011 to 2018, 12 patients (12 knees, 10 male, 5 right, mean age: 54.3 ± standard deviation: 15.2 years) with KEM injuries requiring tendon reconstruction with a 1-year minimum follow up were identified. Postoperative follow-up was 42.6 months (range: 12.0-93.0 months). Procedures included patellar (7) and quadriceps tendon reconstruction (5). Postoperative versus preoperative Tegner Activity Scale scores demonstrated significant improvement (3.5 ± 2.5 vs 1.5 ± 1.2, n = 8, P = .05). Postoperative versus preoperative Kujala scores significantly improved (70.3 ± 11.7 vs 43.6 ± 15.7, n = 8, P = .010). There was significant improvement in preoperative to postoperative KEMR extension lag (29.4 ± 22.2° vs 0.83 ± 1.9°, P = .002). Clinically, there was no difference in passive range of motion between the operative and contralateral knee. BioDex testing demonstrated decreased maximum work generated from the operative versus contralateral knee at slow (70.4 ± 30.4 Joules vs 101.9 ± 40.6 J; P = .028), intermediate (52.0 ± 45.4 J vs 69.8 ± 63.7 J; P = .038), and fast (43.8 ± 41.7 J vs 57.5 ± 53.8 J; P = .050) speeds. Range of motion was less in the operative versus contralateral knee at all speeds: P = .011, .038, and .024. The average peak torque generated per body weight was smaller in the operative versus contralateral knee at slow speed (P = .038).ConclusionsPatients undergoing KEMR in this study have significantly improved clinical outcomes despite having strength deficits that persist postoperatively.Level of evidenceTherapeutic Case Series, Level IV.

Project description:We sought to evaluate the effects of the application of torque pulses to the hip and knee joint via a robotic exoskeleton in the context of training propulsion during walking. Based on our previous study, we formulated a set of conditions of torque pulses applied to the hip and knee joint associated with changes in push-off posture, a component of propulsion. In this work, we quantified the effects of hip/knee torque pulses on metrics of propulsion, specifically hip extension (HE) and normalized propulsive impulse (NPI), in two experiments. In the first experiment, we exposed 16 participants to sixteen conditions of torque pulses during single strides to observe the immediate effects of pulse application. In the second experiment, we exposed 16 participants to a subset of those conditions for 200 strides to quantify short-term adaptation effects. During pulse application, NPI aligned with the expected modulation of push-off posture, while HE was modulated in the opposite direction. The timing of the applied pulses, early or late stance, was crucial, as the effects were often in the opposite direction when changing timing condition. Extension torque applied at late stance increased HE in both experiments - range of change in HE: (2.9 ± 0.4 deg, 7.7 ± 1.0 deg), . The same conditions resulted in a negative change in NPI only in the single pulse experiment - change in NPI for knee torque: -3.0 ± 0.4 ms, - and no significant change for hip torque. Also, knee extension and flexion torque during early and late stance, respectively, increased NPI during single pulse application - range of change in NPI: (3.8, 4.6) ± 0.8 ms, . During repeated pulse application, NPI increased for late stance flexion torque - range of change in NPI: (4.5 ± 0.7 ms, 4.8 ± 0.8 ms), , but not late stance extension torque. After exposure, we observed positive after-effects in HE in three conditions - range of change in HE: (2.0 ± 0.3 deg, 3.7 ± 0.7 deg) - and significant positive after-effects in NPI for early stance flexion torques - change in NPI: (2.7 ± 0.6 ms, ). These results indicate that positive propulsive after-effects can be achieved through repeated exposure to torque pulses.

Project description:BackgroundWith aging, the ability to generate muscle force decreases, contributing to declines in physical functions such as walking. While most studies assess muscle force by peak torque, the rate of torque development (RTD) reflects a dynamic component of muscle performance that is important for physical function. Using data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, we assessed whether RTD adds significantly to peak torque in associations with lower extremity performance. If so, RTD may help identify weak older adults for screening and intervention.MethodsWe assessed associations of RTD and peak torque with physical performance independent of demographics, BMI, body composition, and each other in 1089 Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging participants (49.7% women; aged 26 to 96 years; women, 64.0 ± 13.8 years; men, 68.4 ± 14.4 years). Peak torque was assessed by isometric and 30 deg/s isokinetic knee extension tests. Peak RTD was operationalized as the maximum torque-time slope among successive 50 ms epochs over the first 3 s of a test of knee extension isometric strength, with the knee joint positioned at 120 deg of flexion. A battery of lower extremity performance tests included gait speed during a 6 m walk at usual and fast pace (6 m usual and fast), time to complete a 400 m walk at fast pace (400 m), distance covered in a 2.5 min walk at normal pace (2.5 min), time to complete 5 and 10 chair stands, and two summary tests of lower extremity performance. Sex-stratified generalized linear regression models were adjusted for age, race, BMI, appendicular lean mass, and whole body fat mass.ResultsIn men, independent of either measure of peak torque and cofactors, RTD was a significant (P < 0.05) predictor of all lower extremity performance tests except the 400 m and 2.5 min walks. In women, independent of peak torque, RTD was only a significant independent correlate of the 6 m fast walk (P < 0.001).ConclusionsRTD independently contributes to physical functions in men but less in women. The mechanisms underlying the sex difference are unclear and require further study.

Dataset Information

Effect of the Knee and Hip Angles on Knee Extensor Torque: Neural, Architectural, and Mechanical Considerations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets