Project description:BACKGROUND:The left coronary cusp is an uncommon but well-known site for the ablation of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Proximity to the left coronary ostium makes ablation of this arrhythmia challenging. Different power settings have been described by various operators. Our objective was to describe the outcomes with low power ablation. METHODS:Once mapping confirmed origin from the left coronary cusp, ablation was performed if the best site was situated at least 5 mm from the left coronary ostium. Ablation was started at 15 W and, if successful, was stopped after 30 s. When required, higher powers were used up to 30 W. RESULTS:Ten patients with VT or premature ventricular beats mapped to the left coronary cusp were included in the study. No ablation was performed in one patient because of proximity to the left coronary ostium. Successful ablation was performed in eight of the other nine patients with a mean power of 18.1 ± 5.3 W and duration of 42.2 ± 13.5 s. There were no complications. All the eight patients remained free of recurrence at 16.8 ± 16.5 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:VT can be ablated from the left coronary cusp close to the left coronary ostium. Ablation with low power is effective in achieving immediate success which is also durable with time while avoiding complications.
Project description:BackgroundAlthough premature ventricular complexes and ventricular tachycardia (VT) from outflow tracts are easy to map and ablate, some foci create the greatest challenges for the electrophysiologist. One such example is the 'Bermuda triangle' of the heart.Case summaryIn this article, we describe the rarely used but acceptable approach to the 'Bermudian' focus. We present a case of a 38-year-old male patient with sustained monomorphic VT, who underwent radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmogenic myocardium. After unsuccessful ablation through the posterior right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), left coronary cusp (LCC), and distal coronary sinus, tachycardia was eliminated from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Complaints such as palpitations and weakness disappeared after the procedure.DiscussionRadiofrequency ablation of VT might be performed using LAA. This approach is used when the epicardial location of arrhythmia-causing tissue is suspected and ablation through the RVOT, LCC, and great cardiac vein fails.
Project description:BackgroundSustained forms of tachycardia especially from the left ventricular summit are rare. Adenosine sensitive outflow tachycardias, especially from the left ventricular summit, are rarer still. These arrhythmias may be exercise or stress induced as they are facilitated by catecholamines and characteristically terminate with adenosine, vagal manoeuvres, and beta-blockers. The surface 12-lead electrocardiogram can be used to localize the anatomic site of origin before catheter ablation; however, prediction of the precise origin may still be challenging due to the intimate and complex anatomy of the outflow tracts.Case summaryA 12-year-old female presented to an emergency room with frequent runs of wide complex tachycardia that terminated with adenosine but would spontaneously reinitiate. After three additional temporary terminations with adenosine and because of an inability to completely eliminate tachycardia, she was started on an esmolol infusion that resulted in an abrupt termination of tachycardia. At follow-up, she reported breakthrough episodes of tachycardia with exercise, especially associated with beta-blocker non-compliance. The rest of her cardiac testing was normal apart from an anomalous right coronary artery origin from the left coronary sinus. Given the increased frequency of symptomatic palpitations and medication non-compliance, she underwent an electrophysiology study. During the study, a ventricular tachycardia was successfully mapped to an epicardial focus at the left ventricle summit and was successfully ablated.DiscussionThe response of this patient's ventricular tachycardia to adenosine suggests a triggered mechanism. To our knowledge, this is the first unambiguous example of left ventricular tachycardia due to cAMP-mediated triggered activity in this age group.
Project description:Transseptal catheterization has become part of the interventional electrophysiologist׳s technical armamentarium since the development of left atrial catheter ablation and percutaneous technologies for treating mitral and aortic valve disease. Although frequently performed, the procedure׳s most feared complication is aortic root penetration. Focal atrial tachycardia has been described as the most common late sequela of surgical valve replacements. We present a complicated case involving the inadvertent delivery of an 8 French sheath across the noncoronary cusp during radiofrequency catheter ablation for left atrial tachycardia originating from the mitral annulus in a patient with prior mitral valve replacement.
Project description:Data on relative safety, efficacy, and role of different percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for hemodynamic support during the ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedure are limited.We performed a multicenter, observational study from a prospective registry including all consecutive patients (N=66) undergoing VT ablation with a percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in 6 centers in the United States. Patients with intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP group; N=22) were compared with patients with either an Impella or a TandemHeart device (non-IABP group; N=44). There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between both the groups. In non-IABP group (1) more patients could undergo entrainment/activation mapping (82% versus 59%; P=0.046), (2) more number of unstable VTs could be mapped and ablated per patient (1.05±0.78 versus 0.32±0.48; P<0.001), (3) more number of VTs could be terminated by ablation (1.59±1.0 versus 0.91±0.81; P=0.007), and (4) fewer VTs were terminated with rescue shocks (1.9±2.2 versus 3.0±1.5; P=0.049) when compared with IABP group. Complications of the procedure trended to be more in the non-IABP group when compared with those in the IABP group (32% versus 14%; P=0.143). Intermediate term outcomes (mortality and VT recurrence) during 12±5-month follow-up were not different between both groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction ?15% was a strong and independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (53% versus 4%; P<0.001).Impella and TandemHeart use in VT ablation facilitates extensive activation mapping of several unstable VTs and requires fewer rescue shocks during the procedure when compared with using IABP.
Project description:Background The usual approach to epicardial access in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy and megacolon is surgical access to avoid bowel injury. However, there are concerns regarding its safety in cases of Chagas cardiomyopathy with reports of prolonged mechanical ventilation and high mortality in this clinical setting. The aim of this study was to examine feasibility and complication rates for ventricular tachycardia ablation performed with laparoscopic-guided epicardial access. Methods and Results This single center study examined complication rates of the first 11 cases of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy, using laparoscopic guidance to access epicardial space. All 11 patients underwent epicardial VT ablation using laparoscopic-guided epicardial access, and the complication rates were compared with historical medical reports. The main demographic features of our population were age, 63±13 years; men, 82%; and median ejection fraction, 31% (Q1=30% and Q3=46%). All patients were sent for ventricular tachycardia ablation because of medical therapy failure. The reason for laparoscopy was megacolon in 10 patients and massive liver enlargement in 1 patient. Epicardial access was achieved in all patients. Complications included 1 severe cardiogenic shock and 1 phrenic nerve paralysis. No intra-abdominal organ injury occurred; only 1 death, which was caused by progressive heart failure, was reported more than 1 month after the procedure. Conclusions Laparoscopic-guided epicardial access in the setting of ventricular tachycardia ablation and enlarged intra-abdominal organ is a simple alternative to more complex surgical access and can be performed with low complication rates.
Project description:BackgroundCoronary venous ethanol ablation (VEA) can be used as a strategy to treat ventricular arrhythmias arising from the left ventricular summit, but collateral flow and technical challenges cannulating intramural veins in complex venous anatomies can limit its use. Advanced techniques for VEA can capitalize on collateral vessels between target and nontarget sites to improve success.MethodsOf 55 patients with left ventricular summit ventricular arrhythmia, advanced techniques were used in 15 after initial left ventricular summit intramural vein mapping failed to show suitable targets for single vein, single-balloon VEA. All patients had previous radiofrequency ablation attempts. Techniques included: double-balloon for distal protection to block distal flow and target the proximal portion of a large intramural vein where best signal was proximal (n=6); balloons in 2 different left ventricular summit veins for a cross-fire multivein VEA (n=4); intramural collateral vein-to-vein cannulation to reach of targeted vein via collateral with antegrade ethanol and proximal balloon block (n=2); prolonged ethanol dwell time for vein sclerosis of large intramural vein and subsequent VEA (n=3); and intramural collateral VEA (n=1).ResultsFifteen (8 females) patients (age 60.6±17.6 years) required advanced techniques. Procedure time was 210±49.9 minutes, fluoroscopy time was 25.3±14.1 minutes, and 113±17.9 cc of contrast was utilized. A median of 7 cc of ethanol was delivered (range, 4-15 cc). Intraprocedural radiofrequency ablation was delivered before ethanol in 9 out of 15 patients but failed. Ethanol achieved acute success in all 15 patients. Ethanol was used as the sole treatment in two patients. At a median follow-up of 194 days, one patient experienced recurrence.ConclusionsAdvanced techniques capitalizing on venous anatomy can enable successful VEA and selective targeting of arrhythmogenic sites, by blocking distal flow, utilization of collaterals between nontarget and target veins and multivein VEA. Understanding individual anatomy is critical for VEA success.
Project description:BackgroundCatheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be technically challenging due to difficulty with catheter positioning in the left ventricle (LV) and achieving stable contact. The Hansen Sensei Robotic system (HRS) has been used in atrial fibrillation but its utility in VT is unclear.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to test the technical feasibility of robotic catheter ablation of LV ventricular tachycardia (VT) using the HRS.MethodsTwenty-three patients underwent LV VT mapping and ablation with the HRS via a transseptal, transmitral valve approach. Nineteen patients underwent substrate mapping and ablation (18 had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 1 had an apical variant of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). Four patients had focal VT requiring LV VT mapping and ablation. Procedural endpoints included substrate modification by endocardial scar border ablation and elimination of late potentials, or elimination of inducible focal VT.ResultsMapping and ablation were entirely robotic without requiring manual catheter manipulation in all patients and reaching all LV regions with stable contact. Fluoroscopy time of the LV procedure was 22.2 ± 11.2 minutes. Radiofrequency time was 33 ± 21 minutes. Total procedural times were 231 ± 76 minutes. Complications included a left groin hematoma (opposite to the HRS sheath), 1 pericardial effusion without tamponade that was drained successfully, and transient right ventricular failure in a patient with previous left ventricular assist device. At 13.4 ± 6.7 months of follow-up (range 1-19 months), recurrence of VT occurred in 3 of 23 patients.ConclusionOur initial experience suggests that the HRS allows successful mapping and ablation of LV VT.