Dataset Information

Machine learning integrates genomic signatures for subclassification beyond primary and secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

ABSTRACT: Although genomic alterations drive the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), traditional classifications are largely based on morphology, and prototypic genetic founder lesions define only a small proportion of AML patients. The historical subdivision of primary/de novo AML and secondary AML has shown to variably correlate with genetic patterns. The combinatorial complexity and heterogeneity of AML genomic architecture may have thus far precluded genomic-based subclassification to identify distinct molecularly defined subtypes more reflective of shared pathogenesis. We integrated cytogenetic and gene sequencing data from a multicenter cohort of 6788 AML patients that were analyzed using standard and machine learning methods to generate a novel AML molecular subclassification with biologic correlates corresponding to underlying pathogenesis. Standard supervised analyses resulted in modest cross-validation accuracy when attempting to use molecular patterns to predict traditional pathomorphologic AML classifications. We performed unsupervised analysis by applying the Bayesian latent class method that identified 4 unique genomic clusters of distinct prognoses. Invariant genomic features driving each cluster were extracted and resulted in 97% cross-validation accuracy when used for genomic subclassification. Subclasses of AML defined by molecular signatures overlapped current pathomorphologic and clinically defined AML subtypes. We internally and externally validated our results and share an open-access molecular classification scheme for AML patients. Although the heterogeneity inherent in the genomic changes across nearly 7000 AML patients was too vast for traditional prediction methods, machine learning methods allowed for the definition of novel genomic AML subclasses, indicating that traditional pathomorphologic definitions may be less reflective of overlapping pathogenesis.

SUBMITTER: Awada H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8767789 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematological tumor derived from hematopoietic stem cells. The aim of this study is to analyze the biological characteristics and identify the diagnostic markers of CML. We obtained the expression profiles from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and identified 210 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CML and normal samples. These DEGs are mainly enriched in immune-related pathways such as Th1 and Th2 cell differentiation, primary immunodeficiency, T cell receptor signaling pathway, antigen processing and presentation pathways. Based on these DEGs, we identified two molecular subtypes using a consensus clustering algorithm. Cluster A was an immunosuppressive phenotype with reduced immune cell infiltration and significant activation of metabolism-related pathways such as reactive oxygen species, glycolysis and mTORC1; Cluster B was an immune activating phenotype with increased infiltration of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells and NK cells, and increased activation of signaling pathways such as interferon gamma (IFN-γ) response, IL6-JAK-STAT3 and inflammatory response. Drug prediction results showed that patients in Cluster B had a higher therapeutic response to anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 and were more sensitive to imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib. Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE), Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator (LASSO) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms identified 4 CML diagnostic genes (HDC, SMPDL3A, IRF4 and AQP3), and the risk score model constructed by these genes improved the diagnostic accuracy. We further validated the diagnostic value of the 4 genes and the risk score model in a clinical cohort, and the risk score can be used in the differential diagnosis of CML and other hematological malignancies. The risk score can also be used to identify molecular subtypes and predict response to imatinib treatment. These results reveal the characteristics of immunosuppression and metabolic reprogramming in CML patients, and the identification of molecular subtypes and biomarkers provides new ideas and insights for the clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Project description:IntroductionAs a malignant brain tumor, glioblastoma (GBM) is characterized by intratumor heterogeneity, a worse prognosis, and highly invasive, lethal, and refractory natures. Immunotherapy has been becoming a promising strategy to treat diverse cancers. It has been known that there are highly heterogeneous immunosuppressive microenvironments among different GBM molecular subtypes that mainly include classical (CL), mesenchymal (MES), and proneural (PN), respectively. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of immune landscapes among them is essential for identifying novel immune markers of GBM.Methods and resultsIn the present study, based on collecting the largest number of 109 immune signatures, we aim to achieve a precise diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapy prediction for GBM by performing a comprehensive immunogenomic analysis. Firstly, machine-learning (ML) methods were proposed to evaluate the diagnostic values of these immune signatures, and the optimal classifier was constructed for accurate recognition of three GBM subtypes with robust and promising performance. The prognostic values of these signatures were then confirmed, and a risk score was established to divide all GBM patients into high-, medium-, and low-risk groups with a high predictive accuracy for overall survival (OS). Therefore, complete differential analysis across GBM subtypes was performed in terms of the immune characteristics along with clinicopathological and molecular features, which indicates that MES shows much higher immune heterogeneity compared to CL and PN but has significantly better immunotherapy responses, although MES patients may have an immunosuppressive microenvironment and be more proinflammatory and invasive. Finally, the MES subtype is proved to be more sensitive to 17-AAG, docetaxel, and erlotinib using drug sensitivity analysis and three compounds of AS-703026, PD-0325901, and MEK1-2-inhibitor might be potential therapeutic agents.ConclusionOverall, the findings of this research could help enhance our understanding of the tumor immune microenvironment and provide new insights for improving the prognosis and immunotherapy of GBM patients.

Dataset Information

Machine learning integrates genomic signatures for subclassification beyond primary and secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets