Dataset Information

Broad impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on acute respiratory infections in China: an observational study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To combat the COVID-19 pandemic, nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPI) were implemented worldwide, which impacted a broad spectrum of acute respiratory infections (ARI).

Methods

Etiologically diagnostic data from 142 559 cases with ARIs, who were tested for eight viral pathogens (influenza virus, IFV; respiratory syncytial virus, RSV; human parainfluenza virus, HPIV; human adenovirus; human metapneumovirus; human coronavirus, HCoV; human bocavirus, HBoV, and human rhinovirus, HRV) between 2012 and 2021, were analyzed to assess the changes of respiratory infections in China during the first COVID-19 pandemic year compared to pre-pandemic years.

Results

Test positive rates of all respiratory viruses decreased during 2020, compared to the average levels during 2012-2019, with changes ranging from -17·2% for RSV to -87·6% for IFV. Sharp decreases mostly occurred between February and August when massive NPIs remained active, although HRV rebounded to the historical level during the summer. While IFV and HMPV were consistently suppressed year round, RSV, HPIV, HCoV, HRV HBov resurged and went beyond historical levels during September, 2020-January, 2021, after NPIs were largely relaxed and schools reopened. Resurgence was more prominent among children younger than 18 years and in Northern China. These observations remain valid after accounting for seasonality and long-term trend of each virus.

Conclusions

Activities of respiratory viral infections were reduced substantially in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, and massive NPIs were likely the main driver. Lifting of NPIs can lead to resurgence of viral infections, particularly in children.

SUBMITTER: Li ZJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8767888 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTo mitigate hospital-acquired transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), various prevention and control measures have been strictly implemented in medical institutions. These stringent measures can potentially reduce the incidence of hospital-acquired respiratory infections. This study aimed to assess if there were changes in the prevalence of hospital-acquired respiratory infections during a period of national attention focused on COVID-19 prevention.MethodsA retrospective analysis of the clinical data from adult patients with hospital-acquired respiratory infections admitted between October and December 2019 and during the same period in 2020 was performed. All patients were referred from a general hospital in Beijing China and COVID-19 patients were not treated at the hospital. Hospital-acquired respiratory infections were diagnosed based on the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC/NHSN). A comparison of the incidence and mortality rate of hospital-acquired respiratory infections between the two selected time periods was conducted. Additionally, multivariate logistics regression analysis was used to identify mortality-associated risk factors.ResultsThis study included 2,211 patients from October to December 2019 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic) and 2,921 patients from October to December 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). The incidence of hospital-acquired respiratory infections in 2019 and 2020 was 4.7% and 2.9%, respectively, with odds ratio (OR): 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.81, and P = 0.001. In-hospital mortality of hospital-acquired respiratory infections in 2019 and 2020 was 30.5% and 38.4%, respectively, with OR: 1.42, 95%CI: 0.78-2.59, and P = 0.25. Multivariate logistics regression analysis revealed that a history of previous malignancy (OR: 2.50, 95%CI: 1.16-5.35, P = 0.02), was associated with in-hospital mortality.ConclusionsThe incidence of hospital-acquired respiratory infections was significantly decreased following the implementation of various prevention and control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. A history of previous malignancy was associated with higher in-hospital mortality in older inpatients with hospital-acquired respiratory infections.

Project description:ImportanceIndividuals surviving severe COVID-19 may be at increased risk of neuropsychiatric sequelae. Robust assessment of these risks may help improve clinical understanding of the post-COVID syndrome, aid clinical care during the ongoing pandemic, and inform postpandemic planning.ObjectiveTo quantify the risks of new-onset neuropsychiatric conditions and new neuropsychiatric medication prescriptions after discharge from a COVID-19-related hospitalization, and to compare these with risks after discharge from hospitalization for other severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design, setting, and participantsIn this cohort study, adults (≥18 years of age) were identified from QResearch primary care and linked electronic health record databases, including national SARS-CoV-2 testing, hospital episode statistics, intensive care admissions data, and mortality registers in England, from January 24, 2020, to July 7, 2021.ExposuresCOVID-19-related or SARI-related hospital admission (including intensive care admission).Main outcomes and measuresNew-onset diagnoses of neuropsychiatric conditions (anxiety, dementia, psychosis, depression, bipolar disorder) or first prescription for relevant medications (antidepressants, hypnotics/anxiolytics, antipsychotics) during 12 months of follow-up from hospital discharge. Maximally adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs were estimated using flexible parametric survival models.ResultsIn this cohort study of data from 8.38 million adults (4.18 million women, 4.20 million men; mean [SD] age 49.18 [18.45] years); 16 679 (0.02%) survived a hospital admission for SARI, and 32 525 (0.03%) survived a hospital admission for COVID-19. Compared with the remaining population, survivors of SARI and COVID-19 hospitalization had higher risks of subsequent neuropsychiatric diagnoses. For example, the HR for anxiety in survivors of SARI was 1.86 (95% CI, 1.56-2.21) and for survivors of COVID-19 infection was 2.36 (95% CI, 2.03-2.74); the HR for dementia for survivors of SARI was 2.55 (95% CI, 2.17-3.00) and for survivors of COVID-19 infection was 2.63 (95% CI, 2.21-3.14). Similar findings were observed for all medications analyzed; for example, the HR for first prescriptions of antidepressants in survivors of SARI was 2.55 (95% CI, 2.24-2.90) and for survivors of COVID-19 infection was 3.24 (95% CI, 2.91-3.61). There were no significant differences observed when directly comparing the COVID-19 group with the SARI group apart from a lower risk of antipsychotic prescriptions in the former (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.92).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, the neuropsychiatric sequelae of severe COVID-19 infection were found to be similar to those for other SARI. This finding may inform postdischarge support for people surviving SARI.