Dataset Information

Fully automated rigid image registration versus human registration in postoperative spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: a multicenter non-inferiority study.

ABSTRACT: To confirm the fully automated rigid image registration (A-RIR) accuracy in postoperative spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), we conducted a multicenter non-inferiority study compared to the human rigid image registration (H-RIR). Twenty-eight metastatic cancer patients who underwent postoperative spine SBRT are enrolled-image registration (IR) of planning computed tomography (CT) and CT-myelogram for delineating the spinal cord. The adopted A-RIR workflow is a contour-focused algorithm performing a rigid registration by maximizing normalized mutual information (NMI) restricted to the data contained within the automatically extracted contour. Three radiation oncologists (ROs) from multicenters were prompted to review two blinded registrations and choose one for clinical use. Indistinguishable cases were allowed to vote equivalent, counted A-RIR side. A-RIR is considered non-inferior to H-RIR if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of A-RIR preferable/equivalent is greater than 0.45. We also evaluated the NMI improvement from the baseline and the translational/rotational errors between A-RIR and H-RIR. The A-RIR preferable/equivalent was selected in 21 patients (0.75, 95% CI: 0.55-0.89), demonstrating non-inferiority to H-RIR. The A-RIR's NMI improvement was greater than H-RIR in 24 patients: the mean value ± SD was 0.225 ± 0.115 in A-RIR and 0.196 ± 0.114 in H-RIR (P < 0.001). The absolute translational error was 0.38 ± 0.31 mm. The rotational error was -0.03 ± 0.20, 0.05 ± 0.19, -0.04 ± 0.20 degrees in axial, coronal, and sagittal planes (range: -0.66-0.52). In conclusion, A-RIR shows non-inferior to H-RIR in CT and CT-myelogram registration for postoperative spine SBRT planning.

SUBMITTER: Koide Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8776699 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a valuable tool for monitoring response to therapy in oncology. In longitudinal studies, however, patients are not scanned in exactly the same position. Rigid and non-rigid image registration can be applied in order to reuse baseline volumes of interest (VOI) on consecutive studies of the same patient. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of various image registration strategies on standardized uptake value (SUV) and metabolic volume test-retest variability (TRT). METHODS:Test-retest whole-body [18F]FDG PET/CT scans were collected retrospectively for 11 subjects with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies (colorectal carcinoma). Rigid and non-rigid image registration techniques with various degrees of locality were applied to PET, CT, and non-attenuation corrected PET (NAC) data. VOI were drawn independently on both test and retest scans. VOI drawn on test scans were projected onto retest scans and the overlap between projected VOI and manually drawn retest VOI was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). In addition, absolute (unsigned) differences in TRT of SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic volume and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were calculated in on one hand the test VOI and on the other hand the retest VOI and projected VOI. Reference values were obtained by delineating VOIs on both scans separately. RESULTS:Non-rigid PET registration showed the best performance (median DSC: 0.82, other methods: 0.71-0.81). Compared with the reference, none of the registration types showed significant absolute differences in TRT of SUVmax, SUVmean and TLG (p > 0.05). Only for absolute TRT of metabolic volume, significant lower values (p < 0.05) were observed for all registration strategies when compared to delineating VOIs separately, except for non-rigid PET registrations (p = 0.1). Non-rigid PET registration provided good volume TRT (7.7%) that was smaller than the reference (16%). CONCLUSION:In particular, non-rigid PET image registration showed good performance similar to delineating VOI on both scans separately, and with smaller TRT in metabolic volume estimates.

Project description:Cardiovascular resonance (CMR) imaging is a standard imaging modality for assessing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), the leading cause of death globally. CMR enables accurate quantification of the cardiac chamber volume, ejection fraction and myocardial mass, providing information for diagnosis and monitoring of CVDs. However, for years, clinicians have been relying on manual approaches for CMR image analysis, which is time consuming and prone to subjective errors. It is a major clinical challenge to automatically derive quantitative and clinically relevant information from CMR images.Deep neural networks have shown a great potential in image pattern recognition and segmentation for a variety of tasks. Here we demonstrate an automated analysis method for CMR images, which is based on a fully convolutional network (FCN). The network is trained and evaluated on a large-scale dataset from the UK Biobank, consisting of 4,875 subjects with 93,500 pixelwise annotated images. The performance of the method has been evaluated using a number of technical metrics, including the Dice metric, mean contour distance and Hausdorff distance, as well as clinically relevant measures, including left ventricle (LV) end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV mass (LVM); right ventricle (RV) end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and end-systolic volume (RVESV).By combining FCN with a large-scale annotated dataset, the proposed automated method achieves a high performance in segmenting the LV and RV on short-axis CMR images and the left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA) on long-axis CMR images. On a short-axis image test set of 600 subjects, it achieves an average Dice metric of 0.94 for the LV cavity, 0.88 for the LV myocardium and 0.90 for the RV cavity. The mean absolute difference between automated measurement and manual measurement is 6.1 mL for LVEDV, 5.3 mL for LVESV, 6.9 gram for LVM, 8.5 mL for RVEDV and 7.2 mL for RVESV. On long-axis image test sets, the average Dice metric is 0.93 for the LA cavity (2-chamber view), 0.95 for the LA cavity (4-chamber view) and 0.96 for the RA cavity (4-chamber view). The performance is comparable to human inter-observer variability.We show that an automated method achieves a performance on par with human experts in analysing CMR images and deriving clinically relevant measures.

Dataset Information

Fully automated rigid image registration versus human registration in postoperative spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: a multicenter non-inferiority study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets