Dataset Information

Repeatability and reproducibility of deep-learning-based liver volume and Couinaud segment volume measurement tool.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Volumetric and health assessment of the liver is crucial to avoid poor post-operative outcomes following liver resection surgery. No current methods allow for concurrent and accurate measurement of both Couinaud segmental volumes for future liver remnant estimation and liver health using non-invasive imaging. In this study, we demonstrate the accuracy and precision of segmental volume measurements using new medical software, Hepatica™.

Methods

MRI scans from 48 volunteers from three previous studies were used in this analysis. Measurements obtained from Hepatica™ were compared with OsiriX. Time required per case with each software was also compared. The performance of technicians and experienced radiologists as well as the repeatability and reproducibility were compared using Bland-Altman plots and limits of agreement.

Results

High levels of agreement and lower inter-operator variability for liver volume measurements were shown between Hepatica™ and existing methods for liver volumetry (mean Dice score 0.947 ± 0.010). A high consistency between technicians and experienced radiologists using the device for volumetry was shown (± 3.5% of total liver volume) as well as low inter-observer and intra-observer variability. Tight limits of agreement were shown between repeated Couinaud segment volume (+ 3.4% of whole liver), segmental liver fibroinflammation and segmental liver fat measurements in the same participant on the same scanner and between different scanners. An underestimation of whole-liver volume was observed between three non-reference scanners.

Conclusion

Hepatica™ produces accurate and precise whole-liver and Couinaud segment volume and liver tissue characteristic measurements. Measurements are consistent between trained technicians and experienced radiologists.

SUBMITTER: Mojtahed A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8776724 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAccurate measurement of hemorrhage volume is critical for both the prediction of prognosis and the selection of appropriate clinical treatment after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This study aimed to evaluate the performance and accuracy of a deep learning-based automated segmentation algorithm in segmenting spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume either with or without intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) extension. We compared this automated pipeline with two manual segmentation techniques.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 105 patients with acute spontaneous ICH. Depending on the presence of IVH extension, patients were divided into two groups: ICH without (n = 56) and with IVH (n = 49). ICH volume of the two groups were segmented and measured using a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic system and computed tomography-based planimetry (CTP), and the ABC/2 score were used to measure hemorrhage volume in the ICH without IVH group. Correlations and agreement analyses were used to analyze the differences in volume and length of processing time among the three segmentation approaches.ResultsIn the ICH without IVH group, the ICH volumes measured using AI and the ABC/2 score were comparable to CTP segmentation. Strong correlations were observed among the three segmentation methods (r = 0.994, 0.976, 0.974; P < 0.001; concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] = 0.993, 0.968, 0.967). But the absolute error of the ICH volume measured by the ABC/2 score was greater than that of the algorithm (P < 0.05). In the ICH with IVH group, there is no significant differences were found between algorithm and CTP(P = 0.614). The correlation and agreement between CTP and AI were strong (r = 0.996, P < 0.001; CCC = 0.996). The AI segmentation took a significantly shorter amount of time than CTP (P < 0.001), but was slightly longer than ABC/2 score technique (P = 0.002).ConclusionsThe deep learning-based AI diagnostic system accurately quantified volumes of acute spontaneous ICH with high fidelity and greater efficiency compared to the CTP measurement and more accurately than the ABC/2 scores. We believe this is a promising tool to help physicians achieve precise ICH quantification in practice.

Project description:BackgroundMulti-segment foot models (MFMs) for assessing three-dimensional segmental foot motions are calculated via various analytical methods. Although validation studies have already been conducted, we cannot compare their results because the experimental environments in previous studies were different from each other. This study aims to compare the kinematics, repeatability, and reproducibility of five MFMs in the same experimental conditions.MethodsEleven healthy males with a mean age of 26.5 years participated in this study. We created a merged 29-marker set including five MFMs: Oxford (OFM), modified Rizzoli (mRFM), DuPont (DFM), Milwaukee (MiFM), and modified Shriners Hospital for Children Greenville (mSHCG). Two operators applied the merged model to participants twice, and then we analysed two relative angles of three segments: shank-hindfoot (HF) and hindfoot-forefoot (FF). Coefficients of multiple correlation (CMC) and mean standard errors were used to assess repeatability and reproducibility, and statistical parametric mapping (SPM) of the t-value was employed to compare kinematics.ResultsHF varus/valgus of the MiFM and mSHCG models, which rotated the segment according to radiographic or goniometric measurements during the reference frame construction, were significantly more repeatable and reproducible, compared to other models. They showed significantly more dorsiflexed HF and plantarflexed FF due to their static offset angles. DFM and mSHCG showed a greater range of motion (ROM), and some models had significantly different FF points of peak angle.ConclusionsUnder the same conditions, rotating the segment according to the appropriate offset angle obtained from radiographic or goniometric measurement increased reliability, but all MFMs had clinically acceptable reliability compared to previous studies. Moreover, in some models, especially HF varus/valgus, there were differences in ROM and points of peak angle even with no statistical difference in SPM curves. Therefore, based on the results of this study, clinicians and researchers involved in the evaluation of foot and ankle dysfunction need an understanding of the specific features of each MFM to make accurate decisions.

Project description:ObjectiveTo develop and validate a deep learning algorithm that could automate the annotation of scleral spur (SS) and segmentation of anterior chamber (AC) structures for measurements of AC, iris, and angle width parameters in anterior segment OCT (ASOCT) scans.DesignCross-sectional study.SubjectsData from 2 population-based studies (i.e., the Singapore Chinese Eye Study and Singapore Malay Eye Study) and 1 clinical study on angle-closure disease were included in algorithm development. A separate clinical study on angle-closure disease was used for external validation.MethodImage contrast of ASOCT scans were first enhanced with CycleGAN. We utilized a heat map regression approach with coarse-to-fine framework for SS annotation. Then, an ensemble network of U-Net, full resolution residual network, and full resolution U-Net was used for structure segmentation. Measurements obtained from predicted SSs and structure segmentation were measured and compared with measurements obtained from manual SS annotation and structure segmentation (i.e., ground truth).Main outcome measuresWe measured Euclidean distance and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to evaluate SS annotation and Dice similarity coefficient for structure segmentation. The ICC, Bland-Altman plot, and repeatability coefficient were used to evaluate agreement and precision of measurements.ResultsFor SS annotation, our algorithm achieved a Euclidean distance of 124.7 μm, ICC ≥ 0.95, and a 3.3% error rate. For structure segmentation, we obtained Dice similarity coefficient ≥ 0.91 for cornea, iris, and AC segmentation. For angle width measurements, ≥ 95% of data points were within the 95% limits-of-agreement in Bland-Altman plot with insignificant systematic bias (all P > 0.12). The ICC ranged from 0.71-0.87 for angle width measurements, 0.54 for IT750, 0.83-0.85 for other iris measurements, and 0.89-0.99 for AC measurements. Using the same SS coordinates from a human expert, measurements obtained from our algorithm were generally less variable than measurements obtained from a semiautomated angle assessment program.ConclusionWe developed a deep learning algorithm that could automate SS annotation and structure segmentation in ASOCT scans like human experts, in both open-angle and angle-closure eyes. This algorithm reduces the time needed and subjectivity in obtaining ASOCT measurements.Financial disclosuresThe author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Project description:BackgroundTesticular volume (TV) is an essential parameter for monitoring testicular functions and pathologies. Nevertheless, current measurement tools, including orchidometers and ultrasonography, encounter challenges in obtaining accurate and personalized TV measurements.PurposeBased on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), this study aimed to establish a deep learning model and evaluate its efficacy in segmenting the testes and measuring TV.Materials and methodsThe study cohort consisted of retrospectively collected patient data (N = 200) and a prospectively collected dataset comprising 10 healthy volunteers. The retrospective dataset was divided into training and independent validation sets, with an 8:2 random distribution. Each of the 10 healthy volunteers underwent 5 scans (forming the testing dataset) to evaluate the measurement reproducibility. A ResUNet algorithm was applied to segment the testes. Volume of each testis was calculated by multiplying the voxel volume by the number of voxels. Manually determined masks by experts were used as ground truth to assess the performance of the deep learning model.ResultsThe deep learning model achieved a mean Dice score of 0.926 ± 0.034 (0.921 ± 0.026 for the left testis and 0.926 ± 0.034 for the right testis) in the validation cohort and a mean Dice score of 0.922 ± 0.02 (0.931 ± 0.019 for the left testis and 0.932 ± 0.022 for the right testis) in the testing cohort. There was strong correlation between the manual and automated TV (R2 ranging from 0.974 to 0.987 in the validation cohort; R2 ranging from 0.936 to 0.973 in the testing cohort). The volume differences between the manual and automated measurements were 0.838 ± 0.991 (0.209 ± 0.665 for LTV and 0.630 ± 0.728 for RTV) in the validation cohort and 0.815 ± 0.824 (0.303 ± 0.664 for LTV and 0.511 ± 0.444 for RTV) in the testing cohort. Additionally, the deep-learning model exhibited excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation >0.9) in determining TV.ConclusionThe MRI-based deep learning model is an accurate and reliable tool for measuring TV.

Project description:ObjectiveMeasurement of the liver and spleen volumes has clinical implications. Although computed tomography (CT) volumetry is considered to be the most reliable noninvasive method for liver and spleen volume measurement, it has limited application in clinical practice due to its time-consuming segmentation process. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning algorithm (DLA) for fully automated liver and spleen segmentation using portal venous phase CT images in various liver conditions.Materials and methodsA DLA for liver and spleen segmentation was trained using a development dataset of portal venous CT images from 813 patients. Performance of the DLA was evaluated in two separate test datasets: dataset-1 which included 150 CT examinations in patients with various liver conditions (i.e., healthy liver, fatty liver, chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and post-hepatectomy) and dataset-2 which included 50 pairs of CT examinations performed at ours and other institutions. The performance of the DLA was evaluated using the dice similarity score (DSS) for segmentation and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for measurement of the volumetric indices, which was compared with that of ground truth manual segmentation.ResultsIn test dataset-1, the DLA achieved a mean DSS of 0.973 and 0.974 for liver and spleen segmentation, respectively, with no significant difference in DSS across different liver conditions (p = 0.60 and 0.26 for the liver and spleen, respectively). For the measurement of volumetric indices, the Bland-Altman 95% LOA was -0.17 ± 3.07% for liver volume and -0.56 ± 3.78% for spleen volume. In test dataset-2, DLA performance using CT images obtained at outside institutions and our institution was comparable for liver (DSS, 0.982 vs. 0.983; p = 0.28) and spleen (DSS, 0.969 vs. 0.968; p = 0.41) segmentation.ConclusionThe DLA enabled highly accurate segmentation and volume measurement of the liver and spleen using portal venous phase CT images of patients with various liver conditions.