Dataset Information

Wearable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (actiTENS®) is effective and safe for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis pain: a randomized controlled trial versus weak opioids.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Despite their poor tolerance, especially in the elderly, weak opioids (WO) remain commonly prescribed for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). We compared the efficacy and safety of a new wearable transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (W-TENS) device with WO for the treatment of moderate-to-severe, nociceptive KOA chronic pain.

Methods

The study was a non-inferiority, multicentric, prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled, 2-parallel groups Trial. A total of 110 patients with KOA were included (Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grade ⩾2; American College of Rheumatology criteria), with chronic moderate-to-severe nociceptive pain (mean 8-day pain intensity (PI) ⩾ 4 on an 11-point numerical rating scale), in failure to non-opioid analgesics, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients with neuropathic pain were excluded. The co-primary endpoints were mean PI at 3 months (M3) and number of potentially treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Secondary outcomes included Western Ontario MAC Master University function subscale (range, 0-68), additional pain and quality of life measures, and responder rates.

Results

The non-inferiority of W-TENS was demonstrated in both the per protocol (PP) and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations. At M3, PI in PP population was 3.87 (2.12) compared with 4.66 (2.37) [delta: -0.79 (0.44); 95% CI (-1.65, 0.08)] in W-TENS and WO groups, respectively. A planned superiority analysis showed a significant superiority of W-TENS over WO on PI at M3 (p = 0.0124). The number of TRAEs was significantly lower in the W-TENS group (n = 7) than in the WO group (n = 36) (p < 0.001). Other secondary outcomes also favored W-TENS.

Conclusion

W-TENS was more effective and better tolerated than WO in the treatment of chronic nociceptive KOA pain and offers an interesting non-pharmacological analgesic alternative in the management of KOA.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03902340.

SUBMITTER: Maheu E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8777341 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeFibromyalgia is a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain and interference with daily activities. The aim of this study is to assess the benefit of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for persons diagnosed with fibromyalgia.Patients and methodsAdults meeting diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia were randomized in a double-blind trial to receive either an active (n=62) or sham (n=57) wearable TENS device for 3-months. Subjects were classified as having lower or higher pain sensitivity by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST). Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC, primary outcome) and secondary efficacy measures including Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ) were assessed at baseline, 6-weeks and 3-months. Treatment effects were determined by a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (N=119). A pre-specified subgroup analysis of pain sensitivity was conducted using an interaction term in the model.ResultsNo differences were found between active and sham treatment on PGIC scores at 3-months (0.34, 95% CI [-0.37, 1.04], p=0.351) in the ITT population. However, in subjects with higher pain sensitivity (n=60), PGIC was significantly greater for active treatment compared to sham (1.19, 95% CI [0.24, 2.13], p=0.014). FIQR total score (-7.47, 95% CI [-12.46, -2.48], p=0.003), FIQR pain item (-0.62, 95% CI [-1.17, -0.06], p=0.029), BPI Interference (-0.70, 95% CI [-1.30, -0.11], p=0.021) and PDQ (-1.69, 95% CI [-3.20, -0.18], p=0.028) exhibited significant improvements for active treatment compared to sham in the ITT population. Analgesics use was stable and comparable in both groups.ConclusionThis study demonstrated modest treatment effects of reduced disease impact, pain and functional impairment from wearable TENS in individuals with fibromyalgia. Subjects with higher pain sensitivity exhibited larger treatment effects than those with lower pain sensitivity. Wearable TENS may be a safe treatment option for people with fibromyalgia.Clinicaltrialsgov registrationNCT03714425.

Project description:BackgroundTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is commonly used for the management of pain; however, its effects on several pain and function measures are unclear.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the effects of high-frequency TENS (HF-TENS) and low-frequency TENS (LF-TENS) on several outcome measures (pain at rest, movement-evoked pain, and pain sensitivity) in people with knee osteoarthritis.DesignThe study was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.SettingThe setting was a tertiary care center.ParticipantsSeventy-five participants with knee osteoarthritis (29 men and 46 women; 31-94 years of age) were assessed.InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned to receive HF-TENS (100 Hz) (n=25), LF-TENS (4 Hz) (n=25), or placebo TENS (n=25) (pulse duration=100 microseconds; intensity=10% below motor threshold).MeasurementsThe following measures were assessed before and after a single TENS treatment: cutaneous mechanical pain threshold, pressure pain threshold (PPT), heat pain threshold, heat temporal summation, Timed "Up & Go" Test (TUG), and pain intensity at rest and during the TUG. A linear mixed-model analysis of variance was used to compare differences before and after TENS and among groups (HF-TENS, LF-TENS, and placebo TENS).ResultsCompared with placebo TENS, HF-TENS and LF-TENS increased PPT at the knee; HF-TENS also increased PPT over the tibialis anterior muscle. There was no effect on the cutaneous mechanical pain threshold, heat pain threshold, or heat temporal summation. Pain at rest and during the TUG was significantly reduced by HF-TENS, LF-TENS, and placebo TENS.LimitationsThis study tested only a single TENS treatment.ConclusionsBoth HF-TENS and LF-TENS increased PPT in people with knee osteoarthritis; placebo TENS had no significant effect on PPT. Cutaneous pain measures were unaffected by TENS. Subjective pain ratings at rest and during movement were similarly reduced by active TENS and placebo TENS, suggesting a strong placebo component of the effect of TENS.