Dataset Information

Effect of a pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program on child dietary patterns, food security, and weight status: a study protocol.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although nutrients in fruits and vegetables are necessary for proper development and disease prevention, most US children consume fewer servings than recommended. Prescriptions for fruits and vegetables, written by physicians to exchange for fresh produce, address access and affordability challenges while emphasizing the vital role of diet in health promotion and disease prevention. Michigan's first fruit and vegetable prescription program (FVPP) exclusively for children was introduced in 2016 at one large pediatric clinic in Flint and expanded to a second clinic in 2018. The program provides one $15 prescription for fresh produce to all pediatric patients at every office visit. Prescriptions are redeemable at a year-round farmers' market or a local mobile market. The current study will assess the impact of this FVPP on diet, food security, and weight status of youth.

Methods

Demographically similar pediatric patient groups with varying levels of exposure to the FVPP at baseline will be compared: high exposure (> 24 months), moderate exposure (12-24 months), and no previous exposure. Data collection will focus on youth ages 8-16 years. A total of 700 caregiver-child dyads (one caregiver and one child per household) will be enrolled in the study, with approximately 200 dyads at clinic 1 (high exposure); 200 dyads at clinic 2 (moderate exposure), and 300 dyads at clinic 3 (no previous exposure). Children with no previous exposure will be introduced to the FVPP, and changes in diet, food security, and weight status will be tracked over two years. Specific aims are to (1) compare baseline diet, food security, and weight status between pediatric patients with varying levels of exposure to the FVPP; (2) measure changes in diet, food security, and weight status before and after never-before-exposed children are introduced to the FVPP; and (3) compare mean 12- and 24-month follow-up measures of diet, food security, and weight status in the initial no exposure group to baseline measures in the high exposure group.

Discussion

Completion of study aims will provide evidence for the effectiveness of pediatric FVPPs and insights regarding the duration and intensity of exposure necessary to influence change.

Trial registration

The study was registered through clinicaltrials.gov [ID: NCT04767282] on February 23, 2021.

SUBMITTER: Saxe-Custack A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8778506 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFood-assisted maternal and child health and nutrition programs are a widely used approach to address undernutrition. Little is known about the effects of these programs' combined household and individual food rations on household and individual food consumption. Tubaramure in Burundi targeted women and children during the first 1000 d of life, and included: 1) food rations (corn-soy blend and micronutrient-fortified vegetable oil); 2) health services strengthening and promotion of their use; and 3) behavior change communication on nutrition, hygiene, and health practices.ObjectivesThe objectives were: 1) to assess Tubaramure's impact on household food consumption and food security, maternal dietary diversity, and infant and young child feeding practices; 2) to explore the role of the food rations; and 3) assess 6-8 mo impacts around 8 mo after the end of the program.MethodsWe used a 4-arm cluster-randomized controlled repeated cross-sectional design (11,906 observations). The treatment arms received the same food ration but differed in the ration timing and duration: 1) the first 1000 d; 2) from pregnancy through 17.9 mo of age; or 3) from birth through 23.9 mo of age.ResultsTubaramure significantly (P < 0.05) improved the percentage of food secure households [from 4.5 to 7.3 percentage points (pp)], and increased household energy consumption (from 17% to 20%) and micronutrient consumption. The program had a positive effect on maternal dietary diversity (+0.4 food groups, P < 0.05) and increased the proportion of children aged 6-23.9 mo consuming ≥4 food groups (from 8.0 to 9.6 pp, P < 0.05). The effects on many outcomes were attributable to the food rations. Postprogram effects (P < 0.05) were found on household food security, maternal dietary diversity, and younger sibling's complementary feeding practices.ConclusionsPrograms such as Tubaramure have the potential to improve food security and household and individual energy and micronutrient consumption in severely resource-constrained populations, as seen in rural Burundi. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01072279.

Project description:BackgroundThere is a need to directly and accurately conceptualize and measure food insecurity in children as part of surveillance and public health efforts.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare parent and child perceptions of child-level food security status via questionnaires within a large, ethnically diverse population.MethodsCross-sectional baseline data from a cluster-randomized controlled trial involving primarily low-income, Hispanic third- to fifth-grade students and their parents were used for analysis. The sample consisted of 2408 dyadic (parent and child) pairs. Parents completed the 8-item child-referenced Household Food Security Survey Module and their responses were compared with an adaption of the 5-item Child Food Security Assessment completed by their child. Levels of association between child and parent perceptions within dyads were calculated using Goodman and Kruskal's γ statistic. A mixed-effects binomial logistic regression model was used to model discordance as a function of child, parent, and household sociodemographic characteristics.ResultsThe child sample was 53% girls, mean age of 9 y, and 63% were Hispanic. The parent sample was 86% women and 65% Hispanic. Child and parent perceptions of child-level food security agreed only 21.7% of the time. There was a weak positive association between child and parent perceptions of child-level food security (γ = 0.162, P < 0.001). Children perceived themselves as less food secure than their parents' perception 70.1% of the time. Household receipt of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits was associated with greater odds of discordant food security perceptions, whereas female children, older children, and parents not working were characteristics associated with lower odds of discordant perceptions.ConclusionsResults, in combination with the existing literature, suggest that parent perceptions of child-level food insecurity may underestimate child-level food insecurity experiences. Inaccurate estimations or underestimations of the true prevalence of child-level food insecurity could be detrimental to maternal and child health efforts. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02668744.

Project description:ImportanceFood insecurity is associated with a less healthy diet. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is associated with reduced food insecurity, but benefit levels may be insufficient for beneficiaries to afford healthy foods.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether participation in SuperSNAP, a program that provides an additional $40 per month for the purchase of fruits and vegetables with no added sugar, sodium, or fat to SNAP beneficiaries, is associated with changes in food purchasing.Design, setting, and participantsThis longitudinal cohort study used data from transaction records of a large supermarket chain with approximately 500 stores located across North Carolina from October 2019 to April 2020. Participants were SNAP beneficiaries.ExposureSuperSNAP participation.Main outcomes and measuresMonthly spending on all fruits, vegetables, legumes, and nuts (primary outcome); spending on less healthy food categories; and spending on sugar-sweetened beverages as 1 category of less healthy foods. Monthly data on purchases by SNAP beneficiaries before and during SuperSNAP participation were compared with data from SNAP beneficiaries not enrolled in the program who shopped at the same stores. Overlap weighting (a propensity score-based method) was used to account for confounding, and linear mixed-effects models were fitted with random effects to account for repeated measures and clustering by store.ResultsThe study included 667 SuperSNAP participants and 33 246 SNAP beneficiaries who did not use SuperSNAP but shopped in the same stores; 436 SuperSNAP participants had preintervention data and were included in the main analysis. SuperSNAP participation was associated with increased monthly purchases of fruits, vegetables, nuts, and legumes ($31.84; 95% CI, $31.27-$32.42; P < .001; 294.52 oz; 95% CI, 288.84-300.20 oz; P < .001). Only a small increase in spending on less healthy food categories compared with the SNAP beneficiaries who did not use SuperSNAP ($1.60; 95% CI, $0.67-$2.53; P < .001) was observed. As total spending increased, the proportion of total food and beverage spending on less healthy foods significantly decreased (difference, 4.51%; 95% CI, 4.27%-4.74%; P < .001). Monthly spending on sugar-sweetened beverages decreased (difference, $1.83; 95% CI, $1.30-$2.36; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, participation in SuperSNAP was associated with meaningful increases in healthy food purchasing. Subsequent studies should investigate whether healthy food incentive programs improve health outcomes.