Dataset Information

Deep learning identified glioblastoma subtypes based on internal genomic expression ranks.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) can be divided into subtypes according to their genomic features, including Proneural (PN), Neural (NE), Classical (CL) and Mesenchymal (ME). However, it is a difficult task to unify various genomic expression profiles which were standardized with various procedures from different studies and to manually classify a given GBM sample into a subtype.

Methods

An algorithm was developed to unify the genomic profiles of GBM samples into a standardized normal distribution (SND), based on their internal expression ranks. Deep neural networks (DNN) and convolutional DNN (CDNN) models were trained on original and SND data. In addition, expanded SND data by combining various The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets were used to improve the robustness and generalization capacity of the CDNN models.

Results

The SND data kept unimodal distribution similar to their original data, and also kept the internal expression ranks of all genes for each sample. CDNN models trained on the SND data showed significantly higher accuracy compared to DNN and CDNN models trained on primary expression data. Interestingly, the CDNN models classified the NE subtype with the lowest accuracy in the GBM datasets, expanded datasets and in IDH wide type GBMs, consistent with the recent studies that NE subtype should be excluded. Furthermore, the CDNN models also recognized independent GBM datasets, even with small set of genomic expressions.

Conclusions

The GBM expression profiles can be transformed into unified SND data, which can be used to train CDNN models with high accuracy and generalization capacity. These models suggested NE subtype may be not compatible with the 4 subtypes classification system.

SUBMITTER: Mao XG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8780813 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Breast cancer is a profoundly heterogeneous disease with respect to biological and clinical behavior. Gene expression profiling has been used to dissect this complexity and stratify tumors into intrinsic gene expression subtypes associated with distinct biology, patient outcome and different genomic alterations. Additionally, breast tumors occurring in individuals with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations typically fall into distinct subtypes. We applied global DNA copy number and gene expression profiling in 359 breast tumors. All tumors were classified according to intrinsic gene expression subtypes and included cases from genetically predisposed women. The Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer (GISTIC) algorithm was used to identify significant DNA copy number aberrations and genomic subgroups of breast cancer. We identified 31 genomic regions that were highly amplified in >1% of the 359 breast tumors. Several amplicons were found to co-occur, the 8p12 and 11q13.3 regions being the most frequent combination besides amplicons on the same chromosomal arm. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering with 133 significant GISTIC regions (66 and 67 with DNA copy number gain and loss, respectively) revealed six genomic subtypes, termed: 17q12, basal-complex, luminal-simple, luminal-complex, amplifier and mixed subtype. Four of them had striking similarity to intrinsic gene expression subtypes and showed association to conventional tumor biomarkers and clinical outcome. However, luminal A-classified tumors were distributed in two main genomic subtypes, luminal-simple and luminal-complex, the former group having better prognosis while the latter group included also luminal B and the majority of BRCA2-mutated tumors. The basal-complex subtype displayed extensive genomic homogeneity and harbored the majority of BRCA1-mutated tumors. The 17q12 subtype comprised mostly HER2-amplified and HER2-enriched subtype tumors and had the worst prognosis. The amplifier and mixed subtypes contained tumors from all gene expression subtypes, the former being enriched for 8p12-amplified cases while the mixed subtype included many tumors with predominantly DNA copy number losses and poor prognosis. Genomic profiling of 359 breast tumors using tiling BAC aCGH. A number of cases were hybridized as replicates or replicate as dye-swaps. Gene expression profiling of 359 breast tumors using 55K oligonucleotide microarrays.